MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Reviews & Product Details

One of the most powerful capabilities of the MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is its ability to manage the entire lifecycle of your API, from creation to deployment, both on-premises and in the clouds. , earn money and try it all from the same platform1. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform's ability to provide designers and developers with pre-built connectors and tools to create custom connectors is another advantage. Additionally, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform can be easily extended and integrated with the most popular CI/CD2 DevOps systems. The product has good security features, including user and group management and policy management. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some of the problems expressed by users with the MuleSoft Anypoint Platform are as follows:

It does not provide the API level information that modern users need.

Version control issues prevent users from rolling back to previous versions

Cost is high for some customers.

To use it correctly, one must be smart and handle hard work.

Not compatible with some older devices and web SOAP is one of the connectivity limitations. There are some issues with security and performance when dealing with complex integrations or large files. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best about MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is how easy it makes it to integrate multiple systems and data sources. The visual, drag-and-drop interface of Anypoint Studio enables our developers to build integrations and connect to APIs much faster than traditional coding. It abstracts away a lot of the complexities of integration. I also really like the API management capabilities of Anypoint Platform. Being able to create, publish, analyze and secure our APIs all in one place has enabled us to quickly unlock data and functionality for partners and developers to use in new applications. The governance, access control and analytics we get with API Manager is invaluable. Anypoint Platform has allowed us to create a truly connected enterprise where data and apps seamlessly work together. The speed and flexibility it provides for all our integration needs is what I like best. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

If I were to critique the MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, I'd say that one of the downsides is its steep learning curve, especially for those who are new to the integration field. The interface can be a bit overwhelming with various components and functionalities that might confuse new users. Additionally, the platform can be expensive for small to medium-sized businesses, making it less accessible for those with limited resources. Overall, while it's a powerful tool, it could be more user-friendly and cost-effective. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I have been using anypoint platform and anypoint studio both hand in hand. I like how easily we can integrate multiple applications and data transfer. It is easy to design an Api in platform using RAML in the design center. And anypoint platform offers multiple deployment topologies as per the business needs. And the asset Reusability through anypoint exchange Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I can't find something I dislike but anypoint platform recently launched beta version of development ide in the same web application itself though we have the solid tool which is anypoint studio for the development. I just think it's better if they bulid the web IDE as awesome as anypoint studio. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It has covered all the parameters in terms of observability, maintainance, ease of integration - also supports many third party integrations Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There pricing model for SaaS solution - charging based on Vcore can be very expensive compared to other providers Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One of the best tool i have came across in early stage of career which is easy to learn and help us to understand the entire lifecycle of api. I was able to create and deploy API's according to the requirements very quickly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Something i dislike about is it's certification which i was not able to clear Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

User interface and easy to use application Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Loading time sometimes take longer and connector editing is required most of the time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It has the capability to integrate using various connectors Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The platform has a longer learning curve. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The large catalog of connectors. you can find connectors for almost all large vendors and their services.

we just have to focus on architecture of the application.

Cloud hub is also a all in one solution for all needs, we do not have to worry about any infrastructure needs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Mule doesn't support state-fullness, unlike Oracle SOA , it doesn't have any de- hydration store for saving the instances into the database, it helps in the production support debugging . but yeah it doesn't supports state-fullness that's why it is faster than other integration tools. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We used mulesoft for integrating our mainframe with our process API. The mule soft drag drop approach to create Syatem API solved the integration problem. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The frequent patches makes us to update the app frequently causing so many rapid releases. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The different technologies connected via api Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Loading time of on premises version is too long Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.