Recommendations to others considering Metadata.io:
I think Metadata makes a lot of sense for companies that have 1 of 2 things. 1.) They REALLY understand who their audience is, or it's really broad, so getting a specific ICP isn't necessary (large consumer brands), and they have a ton of money to use on testing. This allows users to benefit from the robust ad testing features, which are predicated on multiple offers/assets/creative, but require a ton of budget. 2.) The company looking to use Metadata doesn't have Paid Social experience and would like things to run on "auto-pilot". For teams that understand the nuance of Paid Social, you lose some of the benefits that Metadata has to offer. Similar to how an experienced web developer wouldn't use Squarespace to create their website. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What problems is Metadata.io solving and how is that benefiting you?
We attempted to solve our lead quality issue on social via Metadata (multiple clients have tried) and we've yet to see real impact. The one benefit we have had is targeting TALs on Facebook, so at least we're in front of the right people. But since the lead quality is still really poor, we're only using that for awareness campaigns. We then retarget them via LinkedIn (natively) and filter out the low-value leads. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.