As someone who had never used localization software before, I was genuinely surprised by how intuitive Lokalise was from the start. Previously, all my workflows lived in spreadsheets, which quickly became messy and time-consuming to maintain.
Since switching to Lokalise, my entire process has become faster and far more organized. I rely heavily on the project dashboard, the key-based structure, and the search and filter tools. These make it easy to keep translations and UX copy structured and consistent. Sending strings to our translation team through tasks has been a major improvement. It is now a simple and streamlined step instead of a manual back and forth.
One unexpected benefit has been how much easier it is to maintain our UX copy through Lokalise. Lokalise’s clear interface and collaboration features mean nothing gets lost, repeated, or overwritten. It has also helped me catch inconsistencies in wording that I never would have spotted when everything lived in spreadsheets.
Overall, Lokalise has been a major quality of life upgrade. It has not only sped up my workflow. It has made the entire localization process feel cleaner, clearer, and much more scalable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I have not come across any major downsides so far. The only limitation I have noticed relates to the Intercom integration. Intercom supports multiple help centres, but Lokalise does not currently allow you to filter content by help centre. This can make it a bit confusing when trying to manage or locate specific articles. It is possible that this limitation comes from the Intercom API itself, but from a user perspective it still creates some friction. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
