Joyent Triton

4.1
(5)

Joyent provides public and private Cloud Computing infrastructure and services.

Work for Joyent Triton?

Learning about Triton?

We can help you find the solution that fits you best.

Joyent Triton Reviews

Chat with a G2 Advisor
Write a Review
Filter Reviews
Filter Reviews
  • Ratings
  • Company Size
  • User Role
  • For Category
  • Industry
Ratings
Company Size
User Role
For Category
Industry
Showing 5 Triton reviews
LinkedIn Connections
Triton review by Robert G.
Robert G.
Validated Reviewer
Verified Current User
Review Source
content

"Joyent is a great hosting platform"

What do you like best?

I like the technology being used (SmartOS, ZFS, Solaris Zones, KVM/BHYVE), the performance of the server instances and their support. Their support is top notch and I have regularly dealt with engineer level support staff anytime there was a problem that popped up.

What do you dislike?

The web interface for managing services is very feature complete but can be fairly slow at times. Hoping they improve that soon.

Recommendations to others considering the product

Highly recommend trying it and comparing it to other services. The simplicity of billing and performance make it much better than AWS. The performance makes it better than all other vendors we evaluated.

What business problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?

Hosting of internal business only servers, hosting of customer servers and hosting of data in the MANTA service. We have had great up times and performance from the servers. The MANTA service has been great for same datacenter shared storage.

Sign in to G2 to see what your connections have to say about Joyent Triton
Triton review by Matthias G.
Matthias G.
Validated Reviewer
Verified Current User
Review Source
content

"Working well and fast. Some docker features not available yet (but might not be required either)"

What do you like best?

Its generally quite easy to get started and performance is great. The fact that each container is actually its own solaris (smartos) zone is perfect of course, since it alleviates a number of security concerns which would usually cause a slightly more involved setup.

Also its conceptually much cleaner to handle just one datacenter with lots of containers instead of one datacenter with potentially many hosts (aws) and containers running in all of those. And handling of image storage and host management (there isnt really any) is also taken care of automatically.

What do you dislike?

- No datacenter in germany (which means some services for medical and government related customers cannot be hosted with Triton). But SDC is open-source so we might be able to use the same tech on our own servers.

- Some Docker features are not supported yet. Running docker containers works great and just as easy as expected, but when getting started with certain docker images or just trying to get something up using docker-compose etc which relies on just such features requires at least a minimum understanding of what docker does exactly to get this problem solved.

One such feature is port remapping. While not needed technically, since each container has its own ip and basically is its own vm (zone), it makes first contact a little more involved because most projects out there are written with the assumption that port remapping works and thus the barrier to entry for eval is just a little higher. This might cause devs to dismiss the api as not up to production needs.

See https://github.com/joyent/sdc-docker/tree/master/docs/api/features

- I couldnt yet find ways to use some of the great ZFS features that we rely on heavily on our own servers, such as snapshots, snapshot transfer, or the ability to ensure two container to run on the same physical host, but we havent investigated much here.

Recommendations to others considering the product

Try it. Setting it up is simple. Running the sdc setup script from windows requires one change (due to mingw, see https://github.com/joyent/sdc-docker/issues/58)

What business problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?

We were investigating ways of scaling out our own cloud software more easily and Triton seems to allow that.

Docker is already a perfect fit for our architecture so we have started dockerizing it, but were looking for ways to host it well. Having SmartOS servers ourselves (with all the benefits) we initially wanted to use LX zones. Hearing of Triton though, we were quite naturally excited to use both technologies in perfect harmony.

Having only just begun the validation process we cannot yet foresee how much we will benefit but its looking good for now.

What Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) solution do you use?

Thanks for letting us know!
Triton review by Marius P.
Marius P.
Validated Reviewer
Verified Current User
Review Source
content

"Worked with Triton in the JPC and on-prem in our test laboratory."

What do you like best?

The key features are dtrace, zfs and zones. The addition of lx_brand/docker are amazing.

What do you dislike?

Triton on-prem is clearly for larger organisations. A slimmed down version for single server set-ups or smaller organisations would be great.

The operator / admin portal is not as flexible as it could be. It gets the job done but it could be friendlier and could handle more advanced tasks from the UI directly without having to go to the CLI.

Pricing is a huge put-off. While the technology is great when compared to the existing vendors/solutions for public/private clouds it is very difficult to sell. Vmware, EC2, Microsoft (onprem or Azure) are all cheaper.

What business problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?

Consolidation and performance are of interest to us.

The benefits of containers vs. virtualisation are clear and have been achieved: we can do more with the same hardware but using zones/containers instead of vm's.

Triton review by Aaron B.
Aaron B.
Validated Reviewer
Review Source
content
Business partner of the vendor or vendor's competitor, not included in G2 scores.

"Triton makes container management simple"

What do you like best?

I really loved the fact that Triton was first to market with a truly infinitely salable container solution. The team behind Triton have had fast stable releases that that have added a number of great features.

What do you dislike?

Triton was early to market and there were kinks to work out when it came to adopting docker plugins.

Recommendations to others considering the product

Definitely give Triton a try. It's ability to also run on premises makes it a great option for organizations with security, compliance or cloud provider concerns.

What business problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?

Triton solved the pain of managing underlying infrastructure with an easy to use API.

Triton review by Joe D.
Joe D.
Validated Reviewer
Verified Current User
Review Source
content

"not good as their competitors"

What do you like best?

i was using nodejs for my backend, and ry the guy who creates nodejs worked there. so thats why i know joyent

What do you dislike?

no batch action, terrible dashboard. buggy

What business problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?

iaas

Kate from G2

Learning about Joyent Triton?

I can help.
* We monitor all Joyent Triton reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. Validated reviews require the user to submit a screenshot of the product containing their user ID, in order to verify a user is an actual user of the product.