Our team's experience with JointJS+ has been outstanding. It stands out as a powerful tool in our web development arsenal, particularly for its user-friendly API and extensive range of features. The ease with which it integrates into various web frameworks is remarkable, demonstrating its versatility across different projects.

One of the most impressive aspects is the level of customization it offers. Whether it's simple shapes or complex, interactive diagrams, JointJS+ enables us to create exactly what we need with ease.

The documentation is a notable strength, providing comprehensive guidance and practical examples, which significantly streamline the learning curve. When it comes to performance, JointJS+ excels, ensuring smooth and responsive user interactions, even in scenarios with intricate diagrams.

Overall, JointJS+ has proven to be a robust, efficient, and essential tool in our code base, greatly enhancing our ability to create high-quality, interactive flow like diagrams. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Not dislike, but i would suggest to improve documentation. Add little bit more examples, especially how to work with link vertecies. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

variety of tools and features, and ease of integration with the system Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

the learning curve for new developers is long Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Very clear documentation and examples, this helps a lot when implementing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

You could think about documentation in other languages, for example there is nothing in Portuguese. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There were many great sample implementations of various usecases provided with the trial version. We could save a lot of time regarding how to setup basic UIs and features. With detailed and friendly documentaions, it was very easy for us to apply JointJS+ library in our project just the way we wanted. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Although there were no major drawbacks, it took some time to consider number of cases and decide which way to implement a feature since there are so many ways to implement it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Flexibility and Customization

Ease of creating different types of shapes

Ease of event handling Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Long learning curve

Limited or unclear documentation Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

They have all the tools we need to quickly realize our dream workflow project. They have a very large library of examples and documents. They have created a solution for everything you can or cannot think of in this field. We easily integrated it into our project developed with React and customized it as we wanted. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

So far, I haven't encountered anything negative. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The Demos are really helpful to get started.

Highly customizable features.

Fast responses from the Github community. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Can improve documentation.

Consistency throughout demos. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

JointJS has shortened our time to market mostly thanks to a lot of functionality that would require extensive coding efforts being built into the library already. Exploring these features and providing implementation time estimates was eased by the amount of examples provided. Missing capabilities were easy to add through JointJS' extensibility. All in all it was a pleasant experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

JointJS only provides extensibility beyond the given API in the new Enterprise plan they've just announced. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It felt like the biggest break through for me after being stuck with using svg.js for a while, where I had to invent everything on my own.

With JointJS I can use prebuilt components (love arrows!) and focus on my creativity instead of inventing the building blocks. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Well, quite a few examples are in TypeScript and I'm not a fan. Prefer the usual - JavaScript.

But I've figured out the way how to read them and implement what I need in JS. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is very rich in terms of documentation and visuals. Very easy to use thanks to good documentation I think it is a framework that will save us from a huge workload and allow us to focus on our main goal. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The only downside is that it is paid. But this fee also provides confidence for maintenance. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.