What do you like best about Indeemo?
We’ve been successfully using Indeemo for years for all kinds of clients and have seen it evolve over time into a great qualitative tool.
The Indeemo team is small-but-mighty and one of our favorite partners. We’ve found them to be responsive, conscientious, and most importantly, kind.
The platform itself is easy to use for participants, clients, and qualitative researchers. We love the ability to set up and program our projects and appreciate the ability to collect multimedia content - selfie-style videos, images, texts. Your prompts (or tasks in Indeemo parlance) are limited only by your own information. It’s excellent for virtual, in the moment/in-context research, experiential research, and mobile ethnograpies.
It’s also easy to manage participants. You have the option to load in your own recruits/participants or to recruit through Indeemo. And, you can track progress, push reminders, and ask follow-up questions of individual participants.
Indeemo has added features over the years - there’s the ablity for screen capture (for UX type of research) and journey mapping, and of course built-in AI. Videos are transcripted and can be tagged for easier analysis—particularly the transcripting is a lifesaver.
We highly recommend it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What do you dislike about Indeemo?
These are not dislikes, complains, or platform problems, but a few things to keep in mind about Indeemo:
1) It can be an content collection firehose. We frequently have activities with multiple parts. If you have 30 participants and 10 activities with a single upload per activity, that’s 300 submissions to go through.
2) Indeemo participation is 1:1, so if your research need involves collaboration or interaction between participants, Indeemo may not be the right platform for you.
3) If you reach out to participants through the platform, they will be notified you have a message. You will have to remember to manually check back though. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.