Verified User in Government Administration
IG
Verified User in Government Administration
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Occasional user"
2.5/5
What do you like best about IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next?

The intuitive user interface and the dedication of the sales support team. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next?

Complexity of deployment.and administration. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Alessandra Andrade of IBM Engineering...
Edit edit

Thank you for your feedback. We are pleased that you appreciate our intuitive user interface and dedicated sales support team. We understand the challenges of deployment and administration and are committed to addressing these complexities to improve your experience with IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next.

JR
Jay R.
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Flexibility"
5/5
What do you like best about IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next?

Global accessibility. Capabilities. Global Configurations. DNG Allows you to manage requirements using best practices while streamlining the working process. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next?

There is not much I dislike about DNG. There is a bit of a learning curve. All of the performance issues experienced with scrollinbg through modules has been corected by the engineers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Alessandra Andrade of IBM Engineering...
Edit edit

We're glad to hear that you appreciate the IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next. We understand that there may be a learning curve, but we're constantly working to improve the user experience.

Verified User in Aviation & Aerospace
CA
Verified User in Aviation & Aerospace
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Business partner of the seller or seller's competitor, not included in G2 scores.
" DNG"
5/5
What do you like best about IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next?

globally accessible requirements management and the built in config management. It is powerful while retaining some of the key features of classic DOORS- like modules Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next?

I believe that some improvement can be made around usability. there is a little bit of a learning curve. when you have a large set of requirements in multiple projects and components Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Alessandra Andrade of IBM Engineering...
Edit edit

We're pleased to hear that IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next has helped you save time and improve traceability. We value your feedback about the usability and learning curve, and we are dedicated to making enhancements to address these concerns.

Verified User in Aviation & Aerospace
CA
Verified User in Aviation & Aerospace
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Business partner of the seller or seller's competitor, not included in G2 scores.
"DNG Rocks!"
5/5
What do you like best about IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next?

The new technology on sound functionalities. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next?

Non-seamless migrations from Doors Classic. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Alessandra Andrade of IBM Engineering...
Edit edit

Thank you for sharing your positive experience with DOORS Next. We have improved some migration capabilities and we are actively working to address the issues. Your feedback is valuable to us.

GE
Guia E.
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Still Learning"
3/5
What do you like best about IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next?

I like that the application is still being refined. User comments are constantly being implemented to make the tool better. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next?

I am still learning DNG, so there is nothing I dislike at this time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Alessandra Andrade of IBM Engineering...
Edit edit

We're glad to hear that you appreciate the continuous refinement of IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next. We're committed to delivering a tool that meets the evolving needs of our users.

Dominique W.
DW
Dominique W.
Software Engineer
Defense & Space
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Linking DNG provides"
4/5
What do you like best about IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next?

I like th way it links with QM, CCM and DM. The linking between requirements and work items and test cases is extremely beneficial and is the future. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next?

Its completely different then DOORS - this is fine with me but difficult for those who have used DOORS the past 15 years. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Alessandra Andrade of IBM Engineering...
Edit edit

We're pleased to hear that you find the linking and easy access features of IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next. We understand that the transition from DOORS to DOORS Next can be challenging, especially for long-time DOORS users. Your feedback is valuable to us, and we are committed to addressing the challenges associated with the transition process.

Verified User in Automotive
AA
Verified User in Automotive
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Doors NG Review"
3.5/5
What do you like best about IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next?

DNG graph generating tool on requirement trace-ability.The perference is on tracability interoperability with the other jazz applications.

like the graph formats, provide some insight into status. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next?

The OLSC API is clunky to use, and the reporting API is too limited to use. Having GCM not configured out of the box leads to a lot of problems. dislike the OLSC because seems to break on upgrades and have to manually re connect, engineers complain Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Alessandra Andrade of IBM Engineering...
Edit edit

We're glad to hear that you find the DOORS Next graph generating tool and requirement traceability features helpful for your systems engineering development. We appreciate your insights and will consider them for future enhancements.

Verified User in Industrial Automation
AI
Verified User in Industrial Automation
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Benefits Realized with DNG"
4/5
What do you like best about IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next?

DNG provides traceability, integrity and ability to configure the work flow to meet industry standards. It helps to analyze impact analysis effectively and build tight commnunication with stakeholders by giving all project members visibity to requirements. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next?

I like layers of requirements and ability to align them to align to architecture elements, ability to manage standard work flow across projects via templates and ability to conduct reviews and having the visibility of requirement progress to all skakeholders. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Alessandra Andrade of IBM Engineering...
Edit edit

Thank you for sharing the benefits you have realized with IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next.

CB
christina b.
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Usability"
3.5/5
What do you like best about IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next?

The system is flexible and offers many ways to accomplish almost everything a user needs to perform. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next?

Best practices when during implementation Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Alessandra Andrade of IBM Engineering...
Edit edit

We're glad to hear that you find IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next flexible and accommodating for various user needs.

WV
Walter v.
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Business partner of the seller or seller's competitor, not included in G2 scores.
"DNG rocks"
4.5/5
What do you like best about IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next?

Web based, no install, makes it easier to use Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next?

Difference with Doors classic is sometimes hard Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Alessandra Andrade of IBM Engineering...
Edit edit

Thank you for sharing your positive feedback about DOORS Next. We understand that the transition from Doors classic can be challenging, and we are continuously working to improve the user experience.