With the Hygraph i can set up content structures independently without waiting for other content team member to update. Plus, its APIs are more stable and don’t break easily, even if someone from my team makes changes, which helps for faster progress in my project. While initial stage of my project i found it very easy to setup the initials for my project using Hygraph. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I had switched to Hygraph from another CMS. It caused me to rework on my content models and migrate data of my existing application to use the new APIs. I find it very difficult while migrating my project to Hygraph CMS. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like most about Hygraph is its ease of use. The interface is very intuitive, allowing even those who are not tech experts to navigate without issues. Additionally, its integration with GraphQL is exceptional, making it easy to connect with other services and customize queries. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like least about Hygraph are some limitations in the documentation. Although the tool is powerful, sometimes I have felt that I lack more detailed guides to make the most of all its functionalities, especially for more complex situations. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I love the experience when using the hygraph platform. I also appreciate that the users were put into consideration when creating the interface Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing to dislike about hygraph at this moment. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Hygraph is easily manipulable and being such a big name, it offers many plug-ins, features, and integrations. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I haven't been thrilled will the customer support or the poor Smartling-Hygraph integration that has many bugs and isn't a complete option. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Ease of Use

Ease of Implementation

Ease of Integration Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Limited bandwidth in scheduling the pages Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don't write reviews or give praise lightly, but Hygraph is a product I fully endorse.

I've searched for a headless CMS far and wide to find a perfect match for our product/architecture.

Hygraph ticked a lot of boxes for me as a tech lead, so we started integrating Hygraph into our product.

From the get-go the developer experience was great, and all of the devs in the team love it. Once we started going live with first features via Hygraph, we instantly got a lot of love from our admin users who manage the content.

The most important points we need and get via Hygraph are:

* we wanted the Schema/Model management to be done via UI, basically a no-code solution

* we wanted good filtering options for the content (hygraph offers a lof of dynamic filtering and view setup that fits all of our users)

* we wanted the Webhook capabilities so that we can listen to content changes on the CMS (Hygraph offers just that) + a very nice webhook log which we appreciate greatly

* transparent billing

Also, the Customer Support is proactive and I got help when I needed it on a few occasions.

Anyhow, I'm very excited we found Hygraph and started using it.

To mention, we're using Hygraph for circa 2 months now. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There is nothing I directly dislike about Hygraph. We've found a few bugs, like minor UI glitches here and there, but nothing I would deem dramatic or that would put me off. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Hygraph's interface is clean and pretty easy to navigate which is good when introducing new team members. Setting up and managing content is straightforward, and the GraphQL API makes querying data efficient. It’s a great balance between flexibility and usability. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Hygraph seems to lack built-in templates or pre-made components, so teams need front-end development experience. This can slow things down if content teams need to rely on developers for implementation. So seeing more pre-made components can improve this. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The best thing for me about Hygraph is flexibility and comfort. Manages contents both at ease within a system as well as across multiple channels. Our Staffs meetings are trouble-free. Its api and capacity easily design this project ready from small->large alternatives and fits all long-term flexibility considering requirements changes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Something I dont like about Hygraph is that its highest plans are limited and then tend to get ridiculously expensive as the project grows. Also while it's intuitive exploring some of the more advanced features has steep learning curves and may take a little extra time and effort to really learn and use properly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

i think one of the reasons why i enjoy this is that it can help you in a way that's suited to your needs. The platform makes it easy to integrate content across multiple channels. Im impressed with the customizable element allowing me to make content exactly how i need it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I dont like the fact that some of the advanced features can be purchased for higher tier plans. That would cost you as your project is scaled out. Some advanced configurations may take some time to become acquaint with. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The GraphQL-first API and content modeling flexibility. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The editor experience and publishing workflows still feel limited. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.