--- title: Greenlight Guru Quality Management System Reviews meta_title: 'Greenlight Guru Quality Management System Reviews 2026: Details, Pricing, & Features | G2' meta_description: Filter 437 reviews by the users' company size, role or industry to find out how Greenlight Guru Quality Management System works for a business like yours. aggregate_rating: rating_value: 4.5 review_count: 437 scale: '5' date_modified: '2026-10-17' parent_category: name: Environmental, Quality and Safety Management url: https://www.g2.com/categories/environmental-quality-and-safety-management ---

Greenlight Guru Quality Management System Reviews & Product Details

Value at a Glance

Averages based on real user reviews.

Time to Implement

3 months

Greenlight Guru Quality Management System Reviews (437)

Reviews

Greenlight Guru Quality Management System Reviews (437)

4.5
437 reviews

What do users say?

Generated using AI from real user reviews
Users consistently praise the user-friendly interface and exceptional customer support of Greenlight Guru, highlighting its effectiveness in simplifying quality management processes. Many appreciate how the system centralizes documentation and compliance tasks, making it easier to manage regulatory requirements. However, some users note that the search functionality could be improved for better efficiency.

Pros & Cons

Generated from real user reviews
View All Pros and Cons
Search reviews
Filter Reviews
Clear Results
G2 reviews are authentic and verified.
Biagio Z.
BZ
Biagio Z.
Senior Production Operator
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Fresh, Modern Interface with a Dashboard That Keeps Everything on Track"
4/5
What do you like best about Greenlight Guru Quality Management System?

The system's interface is very friendly to the eye and easy to navigate, and feels fresh and modern as opposed to multiple other systems. Features such as the dashboard really help in keeping track of the most important things. I'm yet to experience any issues with page loadings, document uploading or other sort of file management. The training modules within the system provide sufficient information on how to navigate and use the multiple features it has to offer. I haven't connected it to other tools in my stack nor used the AI feature as the current version of the system already has everything I need. I'm not the actual person paying for it, but I am aware the company switched from Q-Pulse to Greenlight Guru as it offered better value. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Greenlight Guru Quality Management System?

It could use a better categorization system, the current one can fail to properly filter certain things based on minor details, so when you're handling a big amount of files, it is easy for something to sneak in. When adding/removing responsibilities or large documents, system can also glitch and it forces you to refresh the page, sometimes on multiple occasions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Doug U.
DU
Doug U.
Quality Manager
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Great UI, but constant changes and missing quality tools (gauge management)"
2/5
What do you like best about Greenlight Guru Quality Management System?

Best user interface, but they keep changing it. Good for compliance, but lacking Quality functions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Greenlight Guru Quality Management System?

Stop changing the user interface. Every change requires some learning/training which disrupts work and causes confusion. The user interface is already the best, so work on the weaknesses.

A) Lack of compliance to ISO 13485:

(1) 7.6 Gauge management is non-existent. Greenlight's reliance on an Excel sheet to manage gauges is adding no value and missing an easy capability. Use the same workspace as used for supplier management and you can manage all gauges. It is a simple copy with just changes to verbiage.

(2) 7.5 Lack of separate Production and Service Provision has caused several headaches, especially in the 7.5.6 Validation clause. This should be a separate function from design and development for clear documentation of the production processes or needs to be more detailed and clear in the Projects workspace.

B) Lack of Quality functionality:

(1) Analytics do not allow trending by part number or lot for NC/CF/CAPA

(2) No ability to include supplier metrics such as on-time delivery or quantity of product delivered to include with NC/CF/CAPA findings to develop a supplier scorecard or a supplier evaluation.

(3) Adding of customizable fields in NC/CF/CAPA was very helpful but cannot search entries or use them for analytics unless downloading the data to use in an Excel spreadsheet.

(4) No ability to measure/report production data to show capable processes.

(5) Customer Feedback automatically assigns the "Determination for Regulatory Reporting" to the person assigned the CF, but this is a Regulatory task, but the CF is assigned to Quality. Reassigning is not allowed in Greenlight. Why? Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Funda Z.
FZ
Funda Z.
QA Associate
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Easy Folder Creation and Organization"
4/5
What do you like best about Greenlight Guru Quality Management System?

The ability to create and organize folders. The easy approval, rejection and publishing of documents. The justification boxes make things very traceable when comments are added. I really like the feature of comparing previous versions Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Greenlight Guru Quality Management System?

The searching is not advanced enough. Example, if the document is titled EWI-XXXX it does not pop up if I type WI-XXXX. When a letter is missing GLG is not able to find the document.

Example; I need to search for Esop-0001 but if I type Sop-0001 GLG is not able to find it and/or recognize the document. So I have to type the doc ID without a missing letter, error or else. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

AN
Verified User in Biotechnology
QA Director
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Greenlight Guru: Solid Traceability and Comprehensive Management for Medical Devices"
5/5
What do you like best about Greenlight Guru Quality Management System?

What I like most about Greenlight Guru is how well it is adapted to the requirements of the medical device sector. I especially value the traceability control offered by the tool, as well as the ability to manage both product-related aspects and the quality management system within a single platform. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Greenlight Guru Quality Management System?

What I like least is the search functionality, as I do not find it particularly intuitive and, at times, it can hinder the quick location of information. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Medical Devices
UM
Verified User in Medical Devices
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Strong ISO13485 Document Control and Training That Keeps Teams Up to Date"
4/5
What do you like best about Greenlight Guru Quality Management System?

It provides strong control over documents and records, in direct accordance with ISO13485. It also includes a solid training function that helps us ensure employees are always trained on the latest versions of our documents. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Greenlight Guru Quality Management System?

You can be in the middle of a review, or writing an approval or rejection comment, and it can log you out without any warning, which causes you to lose all the work you’ve put into it. This is especially frustrating in the change management workspace when you’re completing the evaluation section. Additionally, in the risk management workspace, when a risk entry grows too large, it can take a long time to scroll to the part that needs to be amended, which makes it inefficient to edit and keep the risk up to date. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Medical Devices
IM
Verified User in Medical Devices
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Powerful Document Management, but Performance Latency Can Slow Access"
5/5
What do you like best about Greenlight Guru Quality Management System?

The system is incredibly helpful for managing a massive volume of documents across a range of different headers. It offers many useful features that have proven almost invaluable to the company I work for. Uploading is straightforward, and the sharing and tagging tools make it easy to keep everything organised and quick to access. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Greenlight Guru Quality Management System?

Latency is a real issue for me. The software can be very slow at times, and it can also be difficult to access when this happens. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Medical Devices
UM
Verified User in Medical Devices
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Modern All-in-One QMS with Smart Document Versioning and Responsive Support"
4/5
What do you like best about Greenlight Guru Quality Management System?

I like having all/most of the aspects of the QMS in one place. The User Interface is attractive and looks professional/modern. Especially compared to some other eQMS' I've seen when visiting supplier's sites.

The ability to modify notifications is helpful and ensures you don't get hundreds of irrelevant emails flooding your inbox.

Having all the documents in one module and having a clear version system in place ensures that we have a much lower risk of using outdated documentation. I like the new(ish) smart feature where GG document module shows you the difference between new versions of documents and the previous version of the document using AI (by showing both documents side-by-side and highlighting what has changed and what has been removed). This makes checking updated documents and training on new documents much easier.

The supplier module is good and allows me to control the suppliers and their certificates/surveys/agreements in one place, with reminders for when certificates expire or when a supplier assessment is due.

Performance is good generally with little down-time.

Support is good from the team at GG. They always get back to you promptly and then check afterwards if the issue is solved. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Greenlight Guru Quality Management System?

The new beta documents workspace is a downgrade on the old one.

- The main area of the screen that shows the list of documents seems a lot smaller in the beta workspace than the old workspace. I’m not sure why it needs the ‘Show 25, 1-25 of 19145’ bit at the very top (this reduces the size of the window showing documents massively and makes it feel very cramped – especially on a laptop).

- In the updated document workspace, when you hover over a document title, it moves the title to the right to show you the ‘favourite’ star. Much preferred the old version where the document titles stayed still and didn’t dance around.

- In the old version, I could use my keyboard arrows to scroll up and down the list of documents. I can’t do this in the updated version.

- The left portion of the documents workspace (with the favourites list) is now bigger (wider) than it was. This is unnecessary and makes the main document section look even more cramped. There is a ‘re-size’ drag tool, but it only allows you to make this column even bigger, not smaller…

The audit workspace is a copy of the non-conformance workspace, which means audits have to be shoehorned into tabs that don't really make sense. The tabs do not reflect an audit process. It would be better if there was a tab for audit plan, a tab for audit report, a tab for auditee's response etc.

The linking in the document workspace is clunky (in the 'related items' section of a document). When you search for a document to link to (e.g. by writing a batch number in the search box), it tends to bring up hundreds of 'Tasks' to link to, rather than documents. You can then end up hunting through many tasks before finding the relevant document you’re searching for. I can't think of any reason I would want to link to a task.

The supplier module could be improved by having a section to add their address(es) in the main summary (e.g. primary site address, secondary site address etc) and also supplier staff’s job titles (which just have to be put in the notes now).

On the Approved supplier list (ASL), you can adjust the width of the columns, but only in a very limited way (e.g. In the column for the supplier ID, the supplier ID’s would have to go up to about SPRL-1000000000 to fill up the column width which GG mandates). This width should be fully customisable as it is in most other software. And you can’t customize the order of the columns either.

- Similarly the columns in the document workspace should be more customisable/modifiable.

The reminder column in the ASL is especially annoying as it takes up about a third of the page because it has the time on there. The time is completely unnecessary for the ASL as ISO certificates don’t expire at a certain time, supplier assessments don’t need to be done at a certain time. I can’t think of any supplier action that needs to be done at a certain time. There should be the option to remove the time requirements.

The document search function is relatively poor/outdated, especially if you use more than one word in the search box. e.g. If I search for ‘Hart’, then update my search for ‘Hart Certificate’, it should narrow the search down (to documents that have both Hart AND Certificate associated with them), but for some reason if you do that now, GG seems to search for all the documents that say ‘Hart’ in and all the documents that say ‘certificate’ in, so you get double the number of search results. You end up having to play a game of 'which relevant search word is the least used in our document database that I can use to try and find the document I'm looking for'.

It is frustrating having the American date format forced on us, with no option to change it. Dates should be formatted day-month-year, rather than month-day-year. It's annoying having to decipher e.g. "Mon Jan 31 2026" every time. This applies to the supplier area (under due dates for reminders) and the documents space (under effective dates), and possibly elsewhere.

- The date formatting also leads to issues when uploading spreadsheets. When we have a date in the document, the document preview page displays the date as the American format. When you download the document, it displays in Excel as the correct English date format. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Medical Devices
UM
Verified User in Medical Devices
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"All Documentation in One Place—Accessible, Linkable, and Great for BMI & Quality Tracking"
4.5/5
Describe the project or task Greenlight Guru Quality Management System helped with:

The service task overview provides a comprehensive look at all ongoing tasks, ensuring that nothing is overlooked and that all processes are running smoothly. It is an essential tool for maintaining efficiency and quality control. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about Greenlight Guru Quality Management System?

It keeps all documentation in one place, everything is accessible and linkable. It makes my work easier. I regularly use the documentation functions for printing BIM's for issuing to production. I also use and like the quality functions for tracking CAPA's, NC's and change orders. I am a user and not sure of the pricing of GLG. I know how important it is within our organization. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Computer Software
UC
Verified User in Computer Software
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Time-Saving Document Comparison Tool That Highlights Only the Changes"
4/5
What do you like best about Greenlight Guru Quality Management System?

The feature I like most is the comparison tool. It helps me compare the revised version of a document with its previous version and highlights only the changes. This saves a lot of time when completing training or reviewing policies on an annual basis. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Greenlight Guru Quality Management System?

Every time a document is uploaded and the author marks it as training for others, Greenlight Guru sends separate emails for each document, which makes it feel like I’m being spammed. Instead, there should be a feature to minimize and streamline these communications to end users so notifications are more consolidated and manageable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Hacer D.
HD
Hacer D.
Senior Regulatory Affairs Officer
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Strong QMS Linking, but Attachment Handling and Document Sign-Offs Are Time-Consuming"
3/5
What do you like best about Greenlight Guru Quality Management System?

That you can link NC's to CAPAs or CF's to CAPAs. That it is one system for the whole QMS. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Greenlight Guru Quality Management System?

For Procedures that have many attachments, it is very time consuming to check out every single attachment and upload it again within the system itself. Somethimes it takes 1 hour to upload all attachments to Greenlight Guru. Another problem for new attachments is that the revision number starts from 0 and doesn't match the revision number of the General Procedure anymore. We need to check out several times to match it to the GP which is very time consuming. We stopped doing it because of time efficiency reasons. We are also not able to electronically sign off documents within the system nor adjusting documents in the system as well. We are basically doing double work. We review and sign off in our server, add it in our document control list and then upload it to greenlight guru with a viewable pdf. The review round in the change control workspace doesn't even make sense for the procedures or work instructions. We face also difficulties sometimes with people being not able to download editable versions even though they have the correct rights. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Questions about Greenlight Guru Quality Management System? Ask real users or explore answers from the community

Get practical answers, real workflows, and honest pros and cons from the G2 community or share your insights.

Verified User
G2
Verified User
•
Last activity over 6 years ago

Can my medical device company benefit from using Greenlight Guru’s software if we are based outside the US or intend to sell our devices into international markets?

2 Upvotes
1
Join the conversation
JK
Jeroen Kruijer
•
Last activity over 4 years ago

When do you think a planning tool/Calender can be incorporated in Greenlight Guru?

2 Upvotes
1
Join the conversation

Pricing Insights

Averages based on real user reviews.

Time to Implement

3 months

Return on Investment

22 months

Average Discount

12%

Greenlight Guru Quality Management System Comparisons
Greenlight Guru Quality Management System Features
Design Controls
Risk Management
Real-time Collaboration
Document Control
Conformance Records
CAPA
Change Management
Document Control
Collaboration
Analytics and Reports