# Top 10 GlusterFS Alternatives & Competitors **Average Rating:** 4.3/5 **Total Number of Reviews:** 27 Explore the best alternatives to GlusterFS for users who need new software features or want to try different solutions. Other important factors to consider when researching alternatives to GlusterFS include performance and availability. The best overall GlusterFS alternative is IBM Storage Ceph. Other similar apps like GlusterFS are Apache Karaf, Diego, Apache ServiceMix, and OpenEBS. GlusterFS alternatives can be found in [Runtime Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/runtime) but may also be in [Cloud File Storage Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/cloud-file-storage). ## Best Paid & Free Alternatives to GlusterFS - [IBM Storage Ceph](https://www.g2.com/products/ibm-storage-ceph/reviews) - [Apache Karaf](https://www.g2.com/products/apache-karaf/reviews) - [Diego](https://www.g2.com/products/diego/reviews) - [Apache ServiceMix](https://www.g2.com/products/apache-servicemix/reviews) - [OpenEBS](https://www.g2.com/products/openebs/reviews) - [containerd](https://www.g2.com/products/containerd/reviews) - [Quobyte](https://www.g2.com/products/quobyte/reviews) - [NexentaStor](https://www.g2.com/products/nexentastor/reviews) - [Sheepdog](https://www.g2.com/products/sheepdog/reviews) - [Diamanti](https://www.g2.com/products/diamanti/reviews) ## Top 10 Alternatives to GlusterFS Recently Reviewed By G2 Community Browse options below. Based on reviewer data, you can see how GlusterFS stacks up to the competition, check reviews from current & previous users in industries like Computer Software, Education Management, and Building Materials, and find the best product for your business. ### 1. [IBM Storage Ceph](https://www.g2.com/products/ibm-storage-ceph/reviews) By IBM **Average Rating:** 4.1/5 **Total Reviews:** 22 IBM Storage Ceph is a massively scalable, open source, distributed storage system. It is comprised of an object store, block store, and a distributed file system. Reviewers say compared to GlusterFS, IBM Storage Ceph is: - Slower to reach roi - More expensive - Better at support Categories in common with GlusterFS: [Runtime](https://www.g2.com/categories/runtime) **Compare:** [GlusterFS vs IBM Storage Ceph](https://www.g2.com/compare/glusterfs-vs-ibm-storage-ceph) **Compare IBM Storage Ceph with other alternatives:** - [IBM Storage Ceph vs Apache Karaf](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-karaf-vs-ibm-storage-ceph) - [IBM Storage Ceph vs Diego](https://www.g2.com/compare/diego-vs-ibm-storage-ceph) - [IBM Storage Ceph vs Apache ServiceMix](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-servicemix-vs-ibm-storage-ceph) - [IBM Storage Ceph vs OpenEBS](https://www.g2.com/compare/ibm-storage-ceph-vs-openebs) - [IBM Storage Ceph vs containerd](https://www.g2.com/compare/ibm-storage-ceph-vs-containerd) - [IBM Storage Ceph vs Quobyte](https://www.g2.com/compare/ibm-storage-ceph-vs-quobyte) - [IBM Storage Ceph vs NexentaStor](https://www.g2.com/compare/ibm-storage-ceph-vs-nexentastor) - [IBM Storage Ceph vs Sheepdog](https://www.g2.com/compare/ibm-storage-ceph-vs-sheepdog) - [IBM Storage Ceph vs Diamanti](https://www.g2.com/compare/diamanti-vs-ibm-storage-ceph) ### 2. [Apache Karaf](https://www.g2.com/products/apache-karaf/reviews) By The Apache Software Foundation **Average Rating:** 4.2/5 **Total Reviews:** 24 Apache Karaf provides dual polymorphic container and application bootstrapping paradigms to the Enterprise. Reviewers say compared to GlusterFS, Apache Karaf is: - More expensive - Easier to set up - Easier to do business with Categories in common with GlusterFS: [Runtime](https://www.g2.com/categories/runtime) **Compare:** [GlusterFS vs Apache Karaf](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-karaf-vs-glusterfs) **Compare Apache Karaf with other alternatives:** - [Apache Karaf vs IBM Storage Ceph](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-karaf-vs-ibm-storage-ceph) - [Apache Karaf vs Diego](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-karaf-vs-diego) - [Apache Karaf vs Apache ServiceMix](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-karaf-vs-apache-servicemix) - [Apache Karaf vs OpenEBS](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-karaf-vs-openebs) - [Apache Karaf vs containerd](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-karaf-vs-containerd) - [Apache Karaf vs Quobyte](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-karaf-vs-quobyte) - [Apache Karaf vs NexentaStor](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-karaf-vs-nexentastor) - [Apache Karaf vs Sheepdog](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-karaf-vs-sheepdog) - [Apache Karaf vs Diamanti](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-karaf-vs-diamanti) ### 3. [Diego](https://www.g2.com/products/diego/reviews) By Cloud Foundry **Average Rating:** 4.3/5 **Total Reviews:** 3 Diego is Cloud Foundry's container management system, responsible for scheduling, running, and monitoring application instances and tasks. It ensures applications are efficiently distributed across virtual machines (VMs, maintains desired application states, and automatically recovers from failures to uphold high availability. Key Features and Functionality: - Container Orchestration: Diego manages the lifecycle of application containers, handling their creation, execution, and termination. - Task and Process Management: It differentiates between one-time tasks and long-running processes (LRPs, allocating resources accordingly to optimize performance. - Self-Healing Mechanism: Diego monitors application health and automatically restarts instances that have crashed, ensuring continuous operation. - Load Balancing: Through the Diego Auction system, it balances workloads across VMs, optimizing resource utilization and application resilience. - Platform Agnostic: Built with flexibility in mind, Diego supports various operating systems and architectures, facilitating diverse deployment environments. Primary Value and Problem Solved: Diego addresses the complexities of container orchestration within Cloud Foundry by automating the deployment, scaling, and management of applications. It ensures that applications run reliably and efficiently, automatically handling failures and distributing workloads to maintain optimal performance. This automation reduces operational overhead, allowing developers to focus on building applications without concerning themselves with the underlying infrastructure. Categories in common with GlusterFS: [Runtime](https://www.g2.com/categories/runtime) **Compare:** [GlusterFS vs Diego](https://www.g2.com/compare/diego-vs-glusterfs) **Compare Diego with other alternatives:** - [Diego vs IBM Storage Ceph](https://www.g2.com/compare/diego-vs-ibm-storage-ceph) - [Diego vs Apache Karaf](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-karaf-vs-diego) - [Diego vs Apache ServiceMix](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-servicemix-vs-diego) - [Diego vs OpenEBS](https://www.g2.com/compare/diego-vs-openebs) - [Diego vs containerd](https://www.g2.com/compare/diego-vs-containerd) - [Diego vs Quobyte](https://www.g2.com/compare/diego-vs-quobyte) - [Diego vs NexentaStor](https://www.g2.com/compare/diego-vs-nexentastor) - [Diego vs Sheepdog](https://www.g2.com/compare/diego-vs-sheepdog) - [Diego vs Diamanti](https://www.g2.com/compare/diamanti-vs-diego) ### 4. [Apache ServiceMix](https://www.g2.com/products/apache-servicemix/reviews) By The Apache Software Foundation **Average Rating:** 3.9/5 **Total Reviews:** 13 Apache ServiceMix is a flexible, open-source integration container that unifies the features and functionality of Apache ActiveMQ, Camel, CXF, and Karaf into a powerful runtime platform you can use to build your own integrations solutions. It provides a complete, enterprise ready ESB. Reviewers say compared to GlusterFS, Apache ServiceMix is: - More expensive - Better at meeting requirements - More usable Categories in common with GlusterFS: [Runtime](https://www.g2.com/categories/runtime) **Compare:** [GlusterFS vs Apache ServiceMix](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-servicemix-vs-glusterfs) **Compare Apache ServiceMix with other alternatives:** - [Apache ServiceMix vs IBM Storage Ceph](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-servicemix-vs-ibm-storage-ceph) - [Apache ServiceMix vs Apache Karaf](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-karaf-vs-apache-servicemix) - [Apache ServiceMix vs Diego](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-servicemix-vs-diego) - [Apache ServiceMix vs OpenEBS](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-servicemix-vs-openebs) - [Apache ServiceMix vs containerd](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-servicemix-vs-containerd) - [Apache ServiceMix vs Quobyte](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-servicemix-vs-quobyte) - [Apache ServiceMix vs NexentaStor](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-servicemix-vs-nexentastor) - [Apache ServiceMix vs Sheepdog](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-servicemix-vs-sheepdog) - [Apache ServiceMix vs Diamanti](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-servicemix-vs-diamanti) ### 5. [OpenEBS](https://www.g2.com/products/openebs/reviews) By OpenEBS **Average Rating:** 5.0/5 **Total Reviews:** 1 OpenEBS is containerized storage for containers integrated tightly into K8S and other environments and based on distributed block storage and containerization of storage control. Categories in common with GlusterFS: [Runtime](https://www.g2.com/categories/runtime) **Compare:** [GlusterFS vs OpenEBS](https://www.g2.com/compare/glusterfs-vs-openebs) **Compare OpenEBS with other alternatives:** - [OpenEBS vs IBM Storage Ceph](https://www.g2.com/compare/ibm-storage-ceph-vs-openebs) - [OpenEBS vs Apache Karaf](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-karaf-vs-openebs) - [OpenEBS vs Diego](https://www.g2.com/compare/diego-vs-openebs) - [OpenEBS vs Apache ServiceMix](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-servicemix-vs-openebs) - [OpenEBS vs containerd](https://www.g2.com/compare/openebs-vs-containerd) - [OpenEBS vs Quobyte](https://www.g2.com/compare/openebs-vs-quobyte) - [OpenEBS vs NexentaStor](https://www.g2.com/compare/nexentastor-vs-openebs) - [OpenEBS vs Sheepdog](https://www.g2.com/compare/openebs-vs-sheepdog) - [OpenEBS vs Diamanti](https://www.g2.com/compare/diamanti-vs-openebs) ### 6. [containerd](https://www.g2.com/products/containerd/reviews) By The Linux Foundation **Average Rating:** 4.7/5 **Total Reviews:** 11 - an industry-standard container runtime with an emphasis on simplicity, robustness and portability. Reviewers say compared to GlusterFS, containerd is: - Better at meeting requirements - More usable Categories in common with GlusterFS: [Runtime](https://www.g2.com/categories/runtime) **Compare:** [GlusterFS vs containerd](https://www.g2.com/compare/glusterfs-vs-containerd) **Compare containerd with other alternatives:** - [containerd vs IBM Storage Ceph](https://www.g2.com/compare/ibm-storage-ceph-vs-containerd) - [containerd vs Apache Karaf](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-karaf-vs-containerd) - [containerd vs Diego](https://www.g2.com/compare/diego-vs-containerd) - [containerd vs Apache ServiceMix](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-servicemix-vs-containerd) - [containerd vs OpenEBS](https://www.g2.com/compare/openebs-vs-containerd) - [containerd vs Quobyte](https://www.g2.com/compare/quobyte-vs-containerd) - [containerd vs NexentaStor](https://www.g2.com/compare/nexentastor-vs-containerd) - [containerd vs Sheepdog](https://www.g2.com/compare/sheepdog-vs-containerd) - [containerd vs Diamanti](https://www.g2.com/compare/diamanti-vs-containerd) ### 7. [Quobyte](https://www.g2.com/products/quobyte/reviews) By Quobyte **Average Rating:** 4.1/5 **Total Reviews:** 5 Quobyte turns commodity servers into a Data Center File System. Quobyte delivers linear scalability, full fault-tolerance, and lights-out operations so that you can focus on your business applications and stop worrying about your storage infrastructure. Categories in common with GlusterFS: [Runtime](https://www.g2.com/categories/runtime) **Compare:** [GlusterFS vs Quobyte](https://www.g2.com/compare/glusterfs-vs-quobyte) **Compare Quobyte with other alternatives:** - [Quobyte vs IBM Storage Ceph](https://www.g2.com/compare/ibm-storage-ceph-vs-quobyte) - [Quobyte vs Apache Karaf](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-karaf-vs-quobyte) - [Quobyte vs Diego](https://www.g2.com/compare/diego-vs-quobyte) - [Quobyte vs Apache ServiceMix](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-servicemix-vs-quobyte) - [Quobyte vs OpenEBS](https://www.g2.com/compare/openebs-vs-quobyte) - [Quobyte vs containerd](https://www.g2.com/compare/quobyte-vs-containerd) - [Quobyte vs NexentaStor](https://www.g2.com/compare/nexentastor-vs-quobyte) - [Quobyte vs Sheepdog](https://www.g2.com/compare/quobyte-vs-sheepdog) - [Quobyte vs Diamanti](https://www.g2.com/compare/diamanti-vs-quobyte) ### 8. [NexentaStor](https://www.g2.com/products/nexentastor/reviews) By DataDirect Networks (DDN) **Average Rating:** 4.4/5 **Total Reviews:** 4 Nexenta Systems offers NexentaStor, a platform delivering ultra-scalable, cloud and virtualization-optimized storage solutions. Categories in common with GlusterFS: [Runtime](https://www.g2.com/categories/runtime) **Compare:** [GlusterFS vs NexentaStor](https://www.g2.com/compare/glusterfs-vs-nexentastor) **Compare NexentaStor with other alternatives:** - [NexentaStor vs IBM Storage Ceph](https://www.g2.com/compare/ibm-storage-ceph-vs-nexentastor) - [NexentaStor vs Apache Karaf](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-karaf-vs-nexentastor) - [NexentaStor vs Diego](https://www.g2.com/compare/diego-vs-nexentastor) - [NexentaStor vs Apache ServiceMix](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-servicemix-vs-nexentastor) - [NexentaStor vs OpenEBS](https://www.g2.com/compare/nexentastor-vs-openebs) - [NexentaStor vs containerd](https://www.g2.com/compare/nexentastor-vs-containerd) - [NexentaStor vs Quobyte](https://www.g2.com/compare/nexentastor-vs-quobyte) - [NexentaStor vs Sheepdog](https://www.g2.com/compare/nexentastor-vs-sheepdog) - [NexentaStor vs Diamanti](https://www.g2.com/compare/diamanti-vs-nexentastor) ### 9. [Sheepdog](https://www.g2.com/products/sheepdog/reviews) By Nippon Telegraph and Telephone **Average Rating:** 4.3/5 **Total Reviews:** 2 Sheepdog is a distributed object storage system for volume and container services and manages the disks and nodes intelligently. Sheepdog features ease of use, simplicity of code and can scale out to thousands of nodes. Categories in common with GlusterFS: [Runtime](https://www.g2.com/categories/runtime) **Compare:** [GlusterFS vs Sheepdog](https://www.g2.com/compare/glusterfs-vs-sheepdog) **Compare Sheepdog with other alternatives:** - [Sheepdog vs IBM Storage Ceph](https://www.g2.com/compare/ibm-storage-ceph-vs-sheepdog) - [Sheepdog vs Apache Karaf](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-karaf-vs-sheepdog) - [Sheepdog vs Diego](https://www.g2.com/compare/diego-vs-sheepdog) - [Sheepdog vs Apache ServiceMix](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-servicemix-vs-sheepdog) - [Sheepdog vs OpenEBS](https://www.g2.com/compare/openebs-vs-sheepdog) - [Sheepdog vs containerd](https://www.g2.com/compare/sheepdog-vs-containerd) - [Sheepdog vs Quobyte](https://www.g2.com/compare/quobyte-vs-sheepdog) - [Sheepdog vs NexentaStor](https://www.g2.com/compare/nexentastor-vs-sheepdog) - [Sheepdog vs Diamanti](https://www.g2.com/compare/diamanti-vs-sheepdog) ### 10. [Diamanti](https://www.g2.com/products/diamanti/reviews) By Diamanti **Average Rating:** 4.3/5 **Total Reviews:** 3 Diamanti is an appliance built to combine the ease of hyperconverged infrastructure with the unparalleled performance of bare-metal containers. Categories in common with GlusterFS: [Runtime](https://www.g2.com/categories/runtime) **Compare:** [GlusterFS vs Diamanti](https://www.g2.com/compare/diamanti-vs-glusterfs) **Compare Diamanti with other alternatives:** - [Diamanti vs IBM Storage Ceph](https://www.g2.com/compare/diamanti-vs-ibm-storage-ceph) - [Diamanti vs Apache Karaf](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-karaf-vs-diamanti) - [Diamanti vs Diego](https://www.g2.com/compare/diamanti-vs-diego) - [Diamanti vs Apache ServiceMix](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-servicemix-vs-diamanti) - [Diamanti vs OpenEBS](https://www.g2.com/compare/diamanti-vs-openebs) - [Diamanti vs containerd](https://www.g2.com/compare/diamanti-vs-containerd) - [Diamanti vs Quobyte](https://www.g2.com/compare/diamanti-vs-quobyte) - [Diamanti vs NexentaStor](https://www.g2.com/compare/diamanti-vs-nexentastor) - [Diamanti vs Sheepdog](https://www.g2.com/compare/diamanti-vs-sheepdog) ## Explore Articles - [Best customer service automation tools for small businesses](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-is-the-best-customer-service-automation-tool-for-small-businesses) - [Top community management apps for e-commerce businesses](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-are-the-top-community-management-apps-for-e-commerce-businesses) - [Leading CPaaS platforms for enterprise](https://www.g2.com/discussions/leading-cpaas-platforms-for-enterprise) - [Which encryption software integrates transparently with enterprise productivity suites like Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/which-encryption-software-integrates-transparently-with-enterprise-productivity-suites-like-microsoft-365-and-google-workspace) - [Top-rated AI assistants for action item tracking](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-are-the-top-rated-ai-assistants-for-action-item-tracking) - [Best tool for managing sales engagements](https://www.g2.com/discussions/best-tool-for-managing-sales-engagements) ## Spotlight Categories - [Sales Enablement Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/sales-enablement) - [Event Management Platforms](https://www.g2.com/categories/event-management-platforms) - [Audit Management Software Solutions](https://www.g2.com/categories/audit-management)