---
title: Gerrit Reviews
meta_title: 'Gerrit Reviews 2026: Details, Pricing, & Features | G2'
meta_description: Filter 32 reviews by the users' company size, role or industry to
  find out how Gerrit works for a business like yours.
aggregate_rating:
  rating_value: 4.3
  review_count: 32
  scale: '5'
date_modified: '2026-08-11'
parent_category:
  name: Source Code Management
  url: https://www.g2.com/categories/source-code-management
---


# Gerrit Reviews
**Vendor:** Gitiles  
**Category:** [Peer Code Review Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/peer-code-review)  
**Average Rating:** 4.3/5.0  
**Total Reviews:** 32
## About Gerrit
Gerrit provides web based code review and repository management for the Git version control system.



## Gerrit Pros & Cons
**What users like:**

- Users value the **robust code review workflow** of Gerrit, enhancing code management and ensuring quality merges. (2 reviews)
- Users appreciate the **user-level access control** in Gerrit, enabling precise management of merge permissions. (1 reviews)
- Users appreciate the **efficient branching management** in Gerrit, enhancing code review workflows and access control. (1 reviews)
- Users value the **robust code review workflow** in Gerrit, facilitating efficient change management and code quality assurance. (1 reviews)
- Users appreciate the **strong Git integration** in Gerrit, enhancing collaboration and streamlining the code review process. (1 reviews)
- Users appreciate the **repository management features** in Gerrit, enhancing collaboration and streamlined code review processes. (1 reviews)
- Review System (1 reviews)
- Security (1 reviews)
- Users value the **task management features** of Gerrit, facilitating efficient collaboration and code review processes. (1 reviews)
- Users value the **enhanced team collaboration** features in Gerrit, fostering efficient communication and code management. (1 reviews)

**What users dislike:**

- Users find the **complexity of setup and learning curve** a barrier, complicating onboarding and integrating modern tools. (1 reviews)
- Users find the **complex setup** of Gerrit time-consuming and challenging, hindering a smooth onboarding process. (1 reviews)
- Users experience a **difficult learning curve** with Gerrit, hindering onboarding and increasing setup complexity for new teams. (1 reviews)
- Users face **integration issues** with modern tools, complicating onboarding and making setup challenging and time-consuming. (1 reviews)
- Users find the **limited integrations** with modern tools a drawback, impacting overall efficiency in code reviews. (1 reviews)
- Users face challenges with **merge conflict resolution** directly in Gerrit, leading to frustration and inefficiency. (1 reviews)

## Gerrit Reviews
  ### 1. A must have tool if you respect the code you or your team wrote

**Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Pranay J. | Senior Software Engineer, Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

**Reviewed Date:** December 10, 2019

**What do you like best about Gerrit?**

Simple interface
Easy to adapt and usability

**What do you dislike about Gerrit?**

I dont think I disliked anything as of now

**Recommendations to others considering Gerrit:**

Try it once i am sure you will like it

**What problems is Gerrit solving and how is that benefiting you?**

It makes coders and reviewers life easy. Easy to use easy to adapt

  ### 2. Best Pre-Commit review tool / workflow, but is a complicated

**Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Verified User in Farming | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

**Reviewed Date:** May 13, 2019

**What do you like best about Gerrit?**

1. Pre-Commit peer reviews ensures no unreviewed code can go in repository. The workflow mandates this without any human interventions.
2. 2-level gates i.e. both Peer review and Build status should be Green to proceed.
3. Can double up as a Git Repo Server as well
4. Fine grained access control
5. Open Source

**What do you dislike about Gerrit?**

1. UI is very native
2. May make the workflow complicated if used along with Github based Workflow. 
3. Too complicated in terms of Access Control and Administration
4. Very complex for Developers to understand and use initially


**Recommendations to others considering Gerrit:**

If each line of your Code is very important to you, you shold invest in Gerrit.  I feel pre-commit review tools like gerrit are a must for Product developments

**What problems is Gerrit solving and how is that benefiting you?**

1. Peer reviews
2. Both +1 and +2 Gates.  i.e. Code build Green and  Peer review OK
3. Repo management

  ### 3. Best maintained code review system

**Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Verified User in Telecommunications | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

**Reviewed Date:** December 10, 2019

**What do you like best about Gerrit?**

The review system where we can give interactive comments and track them effectively.

**What do you dislike about Gerrit?**

To much clumsy when we look at the review page, where the first time user should really work hard to get experienced.

**Recommendations to others considering Gerrit:**

Good process to effectively handle review system

**What problems is Gerrit solving and how is that benefiting you?**

It's simpified my review process and gave good tracking system

  ### 4. Useful tool for review and continuous integration

**Rating:** 3.5/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Verified User in Computer Software | Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

**Reviewed Date:** January 27, 2018

**What do you like best about Gerrit?**

Its easy to integrate with git. Keep track of your changes like - Reviews Done, Comments, Feedback  etc.
You can get your reviews to be reviewed by a peer or you can self review it for minor commits. The fact that it is built on top of Git makes it seamless for anyone considering to move to Gerrit. You can also try out the change and have tests run on your change before making it part of the Code base. 



**What do you dislike about Gerrit?**

User Experience can be improved. Documentation is another area which can be improved.
Also moving to Gerrit initially can be little challenging. You need to integrate it with Git, setting up CI gates etc, can be tedious.

**Recommendations to others considering Gerrit:**

Its a tool worth taking a look at. We have felt it better than github code reviews.

**What problems is Gerrit solving and how is that benefiting you?**

We use Gerrit for code checkin, reviews and static analysis. Gerrit allows us to hold the commit in the queue until it is reviewed. Gerrit helps us improve the code quality, share feedback and catch any errors before it impacts the repository. This helps us with Continous Integration and version control. 

  ### 5. Powerful code review tool built for developers

**Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Verified User in Information Technology and Services | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

**Reviewed Date:** June 25, 2018

**What do you like best about Gerrit?**

Powerful and effective code review tool which is built for developers and flows well.

**What do you dislike about Gerrit?**

Does not have many built-in integrations for other parts of a modern development workflow, so they have to be built from scratch and don't feel native.

**What problems is Gerrit solving and how is that benefiting you?**

Improving code quality by enforcing a code review protocol.

  ### 6. Gerrit - a useful tool for those who cant manage their own code

**Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Arvin A. | Customer Service Representative, Real Estate, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

**Reviewed Date:** January 27, 2018

**What do you like best about Gerrit?**

For many of the not so organized people I work with its a good tool to make sure the code I give them to work on doesn't get lost. It is also a good way to share a code for not so technically inclined associates.

**What do you dislike about Gerrit?**

Its a product for a particular type of people

**What problems is Gerrit solving and how is that benefiting you?**

Managing code in an easy to use platform

  ### 7. Web-based code collaboration tool

**Rating:** 3.5/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Verified User in Research | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

**Reviewed Date:** January 26, 2018

**What do you like best about Gerrit?**

I like that we can make changes to the code immediately and on the fly, also commenting to the changes that we made (and be able to revert if needed).

**What do you dislike about Gerrit?**

There are a lot of similarities, but transitioning from Git to Gerrit has not been as seamless as people have implied it would be.

**Recommendations to others considering Gerrit:**

RTFM

**What problems is Gerrit solving and how is that benefiting you?**

A one-source repository with history and comments has been very helpful. We can see who has made changes, what changes they've made, and quickly evaluate the specific changes.

  ### 8. Streamlined, effective

**Rating:** 3.5/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Honza P. | Senior Software Engineer, Computer Software, Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

**Reviewed Date:** November 08, 2016

**What do you like best about Gerrit?**

I like that each patch is a single commit, unlike GitHub's model which encourages a series of commits in a pull request. I like the level of granularity in choosing approval requirements. I like the Jenkins gate integration.

**What do you dislike about Gerrit?**

The visual appearance of the application leaves a lot to be desired. Keyboard shortcuts in the diff view are a bit strange.

**What problems is Gerrit solving and how is that benefiting you?**

Gerrit allows large teams to effectively manage changes to their software projects.

  ### 9. Neat, perfect for code review

**Rating:** 3.5/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Tony T. | GSoC'16 and Outreachy'12 Organization admin, Internet, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

**Reviewed Date:** March 01, 2016

**What do you like best about Gerrit?**

Neat and clean interface, patch sets can be rebased automatically in most cases without needing a manual rebase. 

**What do you dislike about Gerrit?**

Search is tough, and searching via commit is not implemented. This would mean that the user needs to know the commit id or something like that to search. Lack of real-time notifications, bad formatting of comments making things look badly typed sometimes. 

Commenting on diff can sometimes output badly formatted text. Fetching a comment to a previous patch set seems difficult, as they are piled at the bottom. Often, port 29418 is blocked.

**Recommendations to others considering Gerrit:**

We use jenkins continuous integration with Gerrit, and find it great.  

**What problems is Gerrit solving and how is that benefiting you?**

We use it for code review for the Wikimedia code base. Gerrit has helped in allowing new contributors push their patch sets easily using git review tool, even though its a bit complicated sometimes. The tool helps in developer collaboration, and making the code submission and review process transparent and public. 

  ### 10. Good tool for handling review and integration in a git environment. 

**Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Verified User in Telecommunications | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

**Reviewed Date:** August 24, 2016

**What do you like best about Gerrit?**

Ease of use for submitting code for review to a Gerrit local branch then into master when validated and approved. Web tree source  view is handy too.

**What do you dislike about Gerrit?**

Diff views are a bit rudimentary. Overall review main page is confusing for first user.  Displaying the various patches on the pages is non-intuitive.

**What problems is Gerrit solving and how is that benefiting you?**

Improving code quality through reviews before integration. Having a traceable and integrated  solution for automatically integrating git submissions is very helpful and saves a lot of developer time.

  ### 11. Gerrit works well for us

**Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Verified User in Telecommunications | Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

**Reviewed Date:** June 20, 2016

**What do you like best about Gerrit?**

great for peer code reviews.  can add and edit comments for both the commit overall and individual files.  will send 1 big email containing all the feedback, instead of github which will send 1 email for every single comment.

**What do you dislike about Gerrit?**

the UI looks really bad on mobile phone.  it's not conducive to doing reviews on mobile or tablet.

**What problems is Gerrit solving and how is that benefiting you?**

doing code reviews and code revisions.  linking to jira with a plugin helps a lot.


## Gerrit Discussions
  - [What is Gerrit used for?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-is-gerrit-used-for) - 1 comment

- [View Gerrit pricing details and edition comparison](https://www.g2.com/products/gerrit/reviews?filters%5Bnps_score%5D%5B%5D=4&section=pricing&secure%5Bexpires_at%5D=2026-08-13+00%3A22%3A55+-0500&secure%5Bsession_id%5D=55ba071c-d78d-4676-a7c3-8a7bf92639c1&secure%5Btoken%5D=a34ca7ef52f513552602d14a7cbaeb2d73ba74a5bbb68a9726de6b7024f1e1f0&format=llm_user)
## Gerrit Integrations
  - [Git](https://www.g2.com/products/git/reviews)
  - [GitHub](https://www.g2.com/products/github/reviews)
  - [Jenkins](https://www.g2.com/products/jenkins/reviews)


## Top Gerrit Alternatives
  - [GitHub](https://www.g2.com/products/github/reviews) - 4.7/5.0 (2,334 reviews)
  - [Bitbucket](https://www.g2.com/products/bitbucket/reviews) - 4.4/5.0 (998 reviews)
  - [GitLab](https://www.g2.com/products/gitlab/reviews) - 4.5/5.0 (885 reviews)

