I really like Exclaimer's user customization structure. It makes our business much happier after switching to it because our template locks down legal and branding elements to keep everything on-brand, while still allowing each staff member to fill in personal details like pronouns, direct mobile numbers, and working hours through a self-service portal. This balance between central control and personal flexibility has stopped any pushback from staff who were worried about losing control over how their email signatures look. No one has complained since we went live because they still feel that their signature represents them, just within a company-controlled structure. I also appreciate how the template standardizes email signatures to protect our brand image while allowing some personal touches to make signatures feel more personal. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The WYSIWYG editor has a CSS limitation. It shows up when our designer tries to recreate our brand signature exactly. Some spacing, font rendering, and element positions that look perfect in design files don't translate accurately through the editor. The workaround involves uploading a prebuilt HTML file, but that requires our designer to be involved every time there's a structural change, rather than a marketing person being able to do it themselves. Proper CSS editor access would remove that dependency. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Thanks for taking the time to leave your feedback! Giving staff personal flexibility while keeping branding and legal elements locked down is exactly the balance we aim for! It's brilliant to hear your team feels represented while your brand stays fully protected. We hear you on the CSS editor limitations.
