# Top 10 ExaVault Alternatives & Competitors **Average Rating:** 4.5/5 **Total Number of Reviews:** 194 Explore the best alternatives to ExaVault for users who need new software features or want to try different solutions. Managed File Transfer (MFT) Software is a widely used technology, and many people are seeking easily administered, secure software solutions with reporting and analytics, application integration, and extensibility. Other important factors to consider when researching alternatives to ExaVault include files and customer service. The best overall ExaVault alternative is GoAnywhere MFT. Other similar apps like ExaVault are Progress MOVEit, Progress ShareFile, FileZilla, and Cleo Integration Cloud. ExaVault alternatives can be found in [Managed File Transfer (MFT) Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/managed-file-transfer-mft) but may also be in [File Transfer Protocol (FTP) Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/file-transfer-protocol-ftp) or [Cloud Content Collaboration Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/cloud-content-collaboration). ## Best Paid & Free Alternatives to ExaVault - [GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/products/goanywhere-mft/reviews) - [Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/products/progress-moveit/reviews) - [Progress ShareFile](https://www.g2.com/products/progress-sharefile/reviews) - [FileZilla](https://www.g2.com/products/filezilla/reviews) - [Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/products/cleo-integration-cloud/reviews) - [WinSCP](https://www.g2.com/products/winscp/reviews) - [ActiveBatch](https://www.g2.com/products/activebatch/reviews) - [Thru](https://www.g2.com/products/thru/reviews) - [SFTP To Go](https://www.g2.com/products/sftp-to-go/reviews) - [AWS Transfer Family](https://www.g2.com/products/aws-transfer-family/reviews) ## Top 10 Alternatives to ExaVault Recently Reviewed By G2 Community Browse options below. Based on reviewer data, you can see how ExaVault stacks up to the competition, check reviews from current & previous users in industries like Computer Software, Retail, and Financial Services, and find the best product for your business. ### 1. [GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/products/goanywhere-mft/reviews) By Fortra **Average Rating:** 4.6/5 **Total Reviews:** 451 GoAnywhere MFT is a managed file transfer solution which automates and secures file transfers using a centralized enterprise-level approach. Reviewers say compared to ExaVault, GoAnywhere MFT is: - Slower to reach roi - More expensive Categories in common with ExaVault: [File Transfer Protocol (FTP)](https://www.g2.com/categories/file-transfer-protocol-ftp), [Managed File Transfer (MFT)](https://www.g2.com/categories/managed-file-transfer-mft) **Compare:** [ExaVault vs GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/compare/exavault-vs-goanywhere-mft) **Compare GoAnywhere MFT with other alternatives:** - [GoAnywhere MFT vs Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/compare/goanywhere-mft-vs-progress-moveit) - [GoAnywhere MFT vs Progress ShareFile](https://www.g2.com/compare/goanywhere-mft-vs-progress-sharefile) - [GoAnywhere MFT vs FileZilla](https://www.g2.com/compare/filezilla-vs-goanywhere-mft) - [GoAnywhere MFT vs Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-goanywhere-mft) - [GoAnywhere MFT vs WinSCP](https://www.g2.com/compare/goanywhere-mft-vs-winscp) - [GoAnywhere MFT vs ActiveBatch](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-goanywhere-mft) - [GoAnywhere MFT vs Thru](https://www.g2.com/compare/goanywhere-mft-vs-thru) - [GoAnywhere MFT vs SFTP To Go](https://www.g2.com/compare/goanywhere-mft-vs-sftp-to-go) - [GoAnywhere MFT vs AWS Transfer Family](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-goanywhere-mft) ### 2. [Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/products/progress-moveit/reviews) By Progress Software **Average Rating:** 4.4/5 **Total Reviews:** 529 Exchanging files over the Internet shouldn’t be complicated. That’s why more than 40 million users from around the world rely on MOVEit – The Managed File Transfer Software from Progress to simplify and secure the file transfer tasks, save time, and improve communications. Reviewers say compared to ExaVault, Progress MOVEit is: - More expensive Categories in common with ExaVault: [File Transfer Protocol (FTP)](https://www.g2.com/categories/file-transfer-protocol-ftp), [Managed File Transfer (MFT)](https://www.g2.com/categories/managed-file-transfer-mft) **Compare:** [ExaVault vs Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/compare/exavault-vs-progress-moveit) **Compare Progress MOVEit with other alternatives:** - [Progress MOVEit vs GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/compare/goanywhere-mft-vs-progress-moveit) - [Progress MOVEit vs Progress ShareFile](https://www.g2.com/compare/progress-moveit-vs-progress-sharefile) - [Progress MOVEit vs FileZilla](https://www.g2.com/compare/filezilla-vs-progress-moveit) - [Progress MOVEit vs Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-progress-moveit) - [Progress MOVEit vs WinSCP](https://www.g2.com/compare/progress-moveit-vs-winscp) - [Progress MOVEit vs ActiveBatch](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-progress-moveit) - [Progress MOVEit vs Thru](https://www.g2.com/compare/progress-moveit-vs-thru) - [Progress MOVEit vs SFTP To Go](https://www.g2.com/compare/progress-moveit-vs-sftp-to-go) - [Progress MOVEit vs AWS Transfer Family](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-progress-moveit) ### 3. [Progress ShareFile](https://www.g2.com/products/progress-sharefile/reviews) By Progress Software **Average Rating:** 4.2/5 **Total Reviews:** 1,538 ShareFile offers secure file, sync, and sharing for your small or medium business. Reviewers say compared to ExaVault, Progress ShareFile is: - Slower to reach roi - More expensive Categories in common with ExaVault: [File Transfer Protocol (FTP)](https://www.g2.com/categories/file-transfer-protocol-ftp) **Compare:** [ExaVault vs Progress ShareFile](https://www.g2.com/compare/exavault-vs-progress-sharefile) **Compare Progress ShareFile with other alternatives:** - [Progress ShareFile vs GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/compare/goanywhere-mft-vs-progress-sharefile) - [Progress ShareFile vs Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/compare/progress-moveit-vs-progress-sharefile) - [Progress ShareFile vs FileZilla](https://www.g2.com/compare/filezilla-vs-progress-sharefile) - [Progress ShareFile vs Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-progress-sharefile) - [Progress ShareFile vs WinSCP](https://www.g2.com/compare/progress-sharefile-vs-winscp) - [Progress ShareFile vs ActiveBatch](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-progress-sharefile) - [Progress ShareFile vs Thru](https://www.g2.com/compare/progress-sharefile-vs-thru) - [Progress ShareFile vs SFTP To Go](https://www.g2.com/compare/progress-sharefile-vs-sftp-to-go) - [Progress ShareFile vs AWS Transfer Family](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-progress-sharefile) ### 4. [FileZilla](https://www.g2.com/products/filezilla/reviews) By FileZilla **Average Rating:** 4.5/5 **Total Reviews:** 766 FileZilla is a free, open-source, cross-platform FTP application that includes both client and server components. It supports FTP, FTPS (FTP over SSL/TLS), and SFTP protocols, enabling secure and efficient file transfers across various operating systems, including Windows, Linux, and macOS. FileZilla is renowned for its user-friendly interface and robust performance, making it a preferred choice for both novice and experienced users. Key Features and Functionality: - Protocol Support: Facilitates file transfers using FTP, FTPS, and SFTP protocols. - Cross-Platform Compatibility: Operates seamlessly on Windows, Linux, and macOS systems. - Large File Handling: Supports resuming and transferring files larger than 4GB. - Tabbed User Interface: Allows simultaneous browsing of multiple servers or directories. - Site Manager and Transfer Queue: Enables efficient management of server lists and file transfer tasks. - Drag & Drop Support: Simplifies the process of uploading and downloading files. - Configurable Transfer Speed Limits: Provides control over bandwidth usage during transfers. - Directory Comparison: Highlights differences between local and remote directories. - Remote File Editing: Allows direct editing of files on the server. - Synchronized Directory Browsing: Ensures parallel navigation between local and remote directories. - Remote File Search: Facilitates locating files on the server. Primary Value and User Solutions: FileZilla addresses the need for a reliable and secure method of transferring files between local machines and remote servers. Its support for multiple protocols ensures compatibility with various server configurations, while the intuitive interface and advanced features like directory comparison and remote file editing enhance user productivity. By offering a free, open-source solution, FileZilla provides an accessible and efficient tool for web developers, system administrators, and anyone requiring robust file transfer capabilities. Reviewers say compared to ExaVault, FileZilla is: - Slower to reach roi Categories in common with ExaVault: [File Transfer Protocol (FTP)](https://www.g2.com/categories/file-transfer-protocol-ftp) **Compare:** [ExaVault vs FileZilla](https://www.g2.com/compare/exavault-vs-filezilla) **Compare FileZilla with other alternatives:** - [FileZilla vs GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/compare/filezilla-vs-goanywhere-mft) - [FileZilla vs Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/compare/filezilla-vs-progress-moveit) - [FileZilla vs Progress ShareFile](https://www.g2.com/compare/filezilla-vs-progress-sharefile) - [FileZilla vs Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-filezilla) - [FileZilla vs WinSCP](https://www.g2.com/compare/filezilla-vs-winscp) - [FileZilla vs ActiveBatch](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-filezilla) - [FileZilla vs Thru](https://www.g2.com/compare/filezilla-vs-thru) - [FileZilla vs SFTP To Go](https://www.g2.com/compare/filezilla-vs-sftp-to-go) - [FileZilla vs AWS Transfer Family](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-filezilla) ### 5. [Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/products/cleo-integration-cloud/reviews) By Cleo **Average Rating:** 4.4/5 **Total Reviews:** 597 Cleo Integration Cloud is an ecosystem integration platform that makes it easy to build, automate and manage B2B, application, cloud, and data integrations. It's scalable, intuitive, and requires no custom code or specialized skillsets to manage daily integration operations. Reviewers say compared to ExaVault, Cleo Integration Cloud is: - Slower to reach roi - More expensive Categories in common with ExaVault: [Managed File Transfer (MFT)](https://www.g2.com/categories/managed-file-transfer-mft) **Compare:** [ExaVault vs Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-exavault) **Compare Cleo Integration Cloud with other alternatives:** - [Cleo Integration Cloud vs GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-goanywhere-mft) - [Cleo Integration Cloud vs Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-progress-moveit) - [Cleo Integration Cloud vs Progress ShareFile](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-progress-sharefile) - [Cleo Integration Cloud vs FileZilla](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-filezilla) - [Cleo Integration Cloud vs WinSCP](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-winscp) - [Cleo Integration Cloud vs ActiveBatch](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-cleo-integration-cloud) - [Cleo Integration Cloud vs Thru](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-thru) - [Cleo Integration Cloud vs SFTP To Go](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-sftp-to-go) - [Cleo Integration Cloud vs AWS Transfer Family](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-cleo-integration-cloud) ### 6. [WinSCP](https://www.g2.com/products/winscp/reviews) By WinSCP **Average Rating:** 4.6/5 **Total Reviews:** 233 WinSCP is a free and open-source file transfer client for Microsoft Windows, supporting protocols such as SFTP, SCP, FTP, WebDAV, and Amazon S3. Its primary function is to facilitate secure file transfers between a local and a remote computer. Beyond file transfers, WinSCP offers basic file management and synchronization capabilities, making it a versatile tool for users who require reliable and secure file operations. Key Features and Functionality: - Graphical User Interface: Provides an intuitive interface with options resembling either Windows File Explorer or Norton Commander, catering to user preferences. - Protocol Support: Supports a variety of protocols, including SFTP, SCP, FTP, WebDAV, and Amazon S3, ensuring compatibility with diverse server configurations. - Integrated Text Editor: Allows users to edit remote text files directly within the application, streamlining workflows. - Scripting and Automation: Offers batch file scripting, a command-line interface, and a .NET assembly for advanced programming tasks, enabling automation of file transfer processes. - Directory Synchronization: Supports various methods for synchronizing directories, both semi-automatically and fully automatically, ensuring consistency between local and remote files. - Security Features: Utilizes Secure Shell (SSH) for secure transfers and supports SSH password, keyboard-interactive, public key, and Kerberos (GSS) authentication methods. - Windows Integration: Seamlessly integrates with Windows through drag-and-drop functionality, URL handling, shortcut icons, and jump lists, enhancing user convenience. Primary Value and User Solutions: WinSCP addresses the need for secure, efficient, and user-friendly file transfer and management solutions on the Windows platform. By supporting multiple protocols and offering features like integrated editing, scripting, and synchronization, it simplifies complex file operations for users ranging from system administrators to developers. Its emphasis on security ensures that sensitive data is transferred safely, while its customizable interface and automation capabilities enhance productivity and streamline workflows. Reviewers say compared to ExaVault, WinSCP is: - Slower to reach roi - Easier to admin - Better at meeting requirements Categories in common with ExaVault: [File Transfer Protocol (FTP)](https://www.g2.com/categories/file-transfer-protocol-ftp) **Compare:** [ExaVault vs WinSCP](https://www.g2.com/compare/exavault-vs-winscp) **Compare WinSCP with other alternatives:** - [WinSCP vs GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/compare/goanywhere-mft-vs-winscp) - [WinSCP vs Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/compare/progress-moveit-vs-winscp) - [WinSCP vs Progress ShareFile](https://www.g2.com/compare/progress-sharefile-vs-winscp) - [WinSCP vs FileZilla](https://www.g2.com/compare/filezilla-vs-winscp) - [WinSCP vs Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-winscp) - [WinSCP vs ActiveBatch](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-winscp) - [WinSCP vs Thru](https://www.g2.com/compare/thru-vs-winscp) - [WinSCP vs SFTP To Go](https://www.g2.com/compare/sftp-to-go-vs-winscp) - [WinSCP vs AWS Transfer Family](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-winscp) ### 7. [ActiveBatch](https://www.g2.com/products/activebatch/reviews) By Redwood Software **Average Rating:** 4.5/5 **Total Reviews:** 234 ActiveBatch Workload Automation offers a powerful automation engine, rich library of integrations, and intuitive workflow designer for improved performance and end-to-end visibility of processes. Reviewers say compared to ExaVault, ActiveBatch is: - Slower to reach roi - More expensive - Better at meeting requirements Categories in common with ExaVault: [Managed File Transfer (MFT)](https://www.g2.com/categories/managed-file-transfer-mft) **Compare:** [ExaVault vs ActiveBatch](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-exavault) **Compare ActiveBatch with other alternatives:** - [ActiveBatch vs GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-goanywhere-mft) - [ActiveBatch vs Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-progress-moveit) - [ActiveBatch vs Progress ShareFile](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-progress-sharefile) - [ActiveBatch vs FileZilla](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-filezilla) - [ActiveBatch vs Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-cleo-integration-cloud) - [ActiveBatch vs WinSCP](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-winscp) - [ActiveBatch vs Thru](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-thru) - [ActiveBatch vs SFTP To Go](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-sftp-to-go) - [ActiveBatch vs AWS Transfer Family](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-activebatch) ### 8. [Thru](https://www.g2.com/products/thru/reviews) By Thru **Average Rating:** 4.6/5 **Total Reviews:** 97 Thru’s MFT solutions are engineered to meet our customers’ needs, while providing a user-friendly interface and staying one step ahead in innovation of file transfer. Thru offers cloud-native automated file transfer and ad hoc file sharing services with a growing features list that includes multilevel security measures, centralized visibility, file scheduling, file renaming, file retention, audit trails and reusable endpoints. Reviewers say compared to ExaVault, Thru is: - More expensive - Slower to reach roi - Better at support Categories in common with ExaVault: [File Transfer Protocol (FTP)](https://www.g2.com/categories/file-transfer-protocol-ftp), [Managed File Transfer (MFT)](https://www.g2.com/categories/managed-file-transfer-mft) **Compare:** [ExaVault vs Thru](https://www.g2.com/compare/exavault-vs-thru) **Compare Thru with other alternatives:** - [Thru vs GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/compare/goanywhere-mft-vs-thru) - [Thru vs Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/compare/progress-moveit-vs-thru) - [Thru vs Progress ShareFile](https://www.g2.com/compare/progress-sharefile-vs-thru) - [Thru vs FileZilla](https://www.g2.com/compare/filezilla-vs-thru) - [Thru vs Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-thru) - [Thru vs WinSCP](https://www.g2.com/compare/thru-vs-winscp) - [Thru vs ActiveBatch](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-thru) - [Thru vs SFTP To Go](https://www.g2.com/compare/sftp-to-go-vs-thru) - [Thru vs AWS Transfer Family](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-thru) ### 9. [SFTP To Go](https://www.g2.com/products/sftp-to-go/reviews) By Crazy Ant Labs **Average Rating:** 4.7/5 **Total Reviews:** 167 SFTP To Go is a fully managed cloud SFTP service you can set up with a single click. In addition to the SFTP protocol, you can also use the FTPS or Amazon S3 protocols to access your files, and you can easily automate file and data processing using webhook notifications. Reviewers say compared to ExaVault, SFTP To Go is: - Easier to do business with - Better at support - Easier to admin Categories in common with ExaVault: [File Transfer Protocol (FTP)](https://www.g2.com/categories/file-transfer-protocol-ftp), [Managed File Transfer (MFT)](https://www.g2.com/categories/managed-file-transfer-mft) **Compare:** [ExaVault vs SFTP To Go](https://www.g2.com/compare/exavault-vs-sftp-to-go) **Compare SFTP To Go with other alternatives:** - [SFTP To Go vs GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/compare/goanywhere-mft-vs-sftp-to-go) - [SFTP To Go vs Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/compare/progress-moveit-vs-sftp-to-go) - [SFTP To Go vs Progress ShareFile](https://www.g2.com/compare/progress-sharefile-vs-sftp-to-go) - [SFTP To Go vs FileZilla](https://www.g2.com/compare/filezilla-vs-sftp-to-go) - [SFTP To Go vs Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-sftp-to-go) - [SFTP To Go vs WinSCP](https://www.g2.com/compare/sftp-to-go-vs-winscp) - [SFTP To Go vs ActiveBatch](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-sftp-to-go) - [SFTP To Go vs Thru](https://www.g2.com/compare/sftp-to-go-vs-thru) - [SFTP To Go vs AWS Transfer Family](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-sftp-to-go) ### 10. [AWS Transfer Family](https://www.g2.com/products/aws-transfer-family/reviews) By Amazon Web Services (AWS) **Average Rating:** 4.3/5 **Total Reviews:** 210 Easily manage file transfers and modernize your transfer workflows within hours by using your existing authentication systems. Reviewers say compared to ExaVault, AWS Transfer Family is: - More expensive - Slower to reach roi Categories in common with ExaVault: [Managed File Transfer (MFT)](https://www.g2.com/categories/managed-file-transfer-mft) **Compare:** [ExaVault vs AWS Transfer Family](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-exavault) **Compare AWS Transfer Family with other alternatives:** - [AWS Transfer Family vs GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-goanywhere-mft) - [AWS Transfer Family vs Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-progress-moveit) - [AWS Transfer Family vs Progress ShareFile](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-progress-sharefile) - [AWS Transfer Family vs FileZilla](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-filezilla) - [AWS Transfer Family vs Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-cleo-integration-cloud) - [AWS Transfer Family vs WinSCP](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-winscp) - [AWS Transfer Family vs ActiveBatch](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-activebatch) - [AWS Transfer Family vs Thru](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-thru) - [AWS Transfer Family vs SFTP To Go](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-sftp-to-go) --- ## ExaVault Alternatives FAQs ### How does ExaVault compare to GoAnywhere MFT? According to G2 data, [ExaVault](https://www.g2.com/products/exavault/reviews) and [GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/products/goanywhere-mft/reviews) both provide secure file transfer solutions with strong security features, including encryption and support for protocols like SFTP. ExaVault holds a slightly higher average user rating of 4.5/5 from 194 reviews compared to GoAnywhere MFT's 4.6/5 from 435 reviews. Dimension scores show ExaVault leads GoAnywhere MFT by 0.6 points in "easier to set up" (9.5 vs 8.6) and by 0.6 points in "more usable" (9.5 vs 8.9), while GoAnywhere MFT leads marginally in "easier to admin" by 0.3 points (9.1 vs 9.4) and matches ExaVault in "easier to do business with" (9.2 each). Feature-wise, GoAnywhere MFT offers advanced capabilities not present in ExaVault, including application integration, content routing, file transfer acceleration, load balancing, mobile support, and reporting and analytics. User reviews highlight GoAnywhere MFT's extensive automation and workflow capabilities, integration with cloud services like AWS and Azure, and centralized monitoring and audit trails. ExaVault is praised for ease of use, quick setup, and competitive pricing but has some concerns about usability and user management. Overall, GoAnywhere MFT is favored for enterprise-grade automation, integration, and compliance features, while ExaVault is noted for simpler setup and usability in smaller-scale or cloud-based FTP needs. ### What are the best alternatives to ExaVault? According to G2 data, the best alternatives to ExaVault in the Managed File Transfer category include [GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/products/goanywhere-mft/reviews) (4.6/5 stars, 435 reviews), [Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/products/progress-moveit/reviews) (4.4/5 stars, 527 reviews), and [Progress ShareFile](https://www.g2.com/products/progress-sharefile/reviews) (4.2/5 stars, 1535 reviews). These products are highly rated for their security, automation, and ease of use, with GoAnywhere MFT noted for its extensive integration capabilities and workflow automation, Progress MOVEit for its reliability and compliance features, and Progress ShareFile for secure file sharing and collaboration. ### What features do alternatives offer that ExaVault does not? Alternatives to ExaVault offer features not available natively in ExaVault, including application integration, content routing, file transfer acceleration, load balancing, mobile support, and reporting and analytics. These capabilities enhance automation, scalability, and visibility in managed file transfer workflows. ### Which Managed File Transfer (MFT) tools do reviewers recommend instead of ExaVault? Reviewers recommend [GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/products/goanywhere-mft/reviews) and [Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/products/progress-moveit/reviews) as strong Managed File Transfer tools instead of ExaVault. GoAnywhere MFT is praised for its powerful automation, centralized management, and robust security, while Progress MOVEit is valued for its ease of use, strong security, and compliance support. Both tools offer advanced features like application integration, content routing, and reporting that exceed ExaVault's native capabilities, making them preferred choices for enterprises requiring scalable and feature-rich MFT solutions. ### Why do users choose GoAnywhere MFT over ExaVault? Users choose [GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/products/goanywhere-mft/reviews) over ExaVault primarily for its robust automation and workflow capabilities, which significantly reduce manual effort and errors. With 101 mentions of features and 83 mentions of ease of use and automation, GoAnywhere MFT excels in providing drag-and-drop workflow builders, scheduling, and event-based triggers that streamline complex file transfer processes. Its strong security features, including encryption, compliance support, and centralized audit logs, give users confidence in handling sensitive data, especially in regulated industries. Integration capabilities with cloud platforms like AWS, Azure, SharePoint, and APIs enhance its flexibility for hybrid and multi-cloud environments. The centralized dashboard and detailed logging simplify monitoring and troubleshooting, which users find invaluable. Despite a steeper learning curve and a somewhat outdated UI noted in 24 mentions, users appreciate the platform's scalability and enterprise-grade functionality. GoAnywhere MFT's ability to replace manual scripts and fragmented tools with a unified, secure, and automated solution is a decisive factor for many organizations seeking efficiency, compliance, and reliability in managed file transfer operations. ## Explore Articles - [What's the most recommended partner relationship management software](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-s-the-most-recommended-partner-relationship-management-software) - [What is the most affordable task management software for SMBs?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-is-the-most-affordable-task-management-software-for-smbs) - [Most reliable quality management service in SaaS](https://www.g2.com/discussions/most-reliable-quality-management-services-in-saas-what-s-leading-in-2025) - [Best software to manage audits efficiently](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-s-the-best-software-to-manage-audits-efficiently) - [Is a paid BIM objects platform worth it for a small architecture firm?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/is-a-paid-bim-objects-platform-worth-it-for-a-small-architecture-firm) - [Most recommended account-based tools for software companies](https://www.g2.com/discussions/which-account-based-tools-work-best-for-software-companies) ## Spotlight Categories - [Accounts Payable Automation Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/ap-automation) - [AI Sales Assistant Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/ai-sales-assistant) - [Identity and Access Management (IAM) Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/identity-and-access-management-iam)