# DryRun Security Reviews
**Vendor:** DryRun Security  
**Category:** [Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/static-application-security-testing-sast)  
**Average Rating:** 4.9/5.0  
**Total Reviews:** 20
## About DryRun Security
Security leaders face a paradox: ship faster and enable agentic development while staying secure and keeping developers productive. DryRun Security resolves this by securing every pull request and repo with a high-precision, automated security engineer review right where developers and their agents build. DryRun Security is the industry’s most accurate agentic code security intelligence platform. Powered by its proprietary Contextual Security Analysis (CSA) engine, DryRun Security delivers the AI moment for security teams in an AI-native developer world. Traditional static application security testing (SAST) floods teams with alerts, misses higher-order risk, and burns time in triage. DryRun Security goes beyond SAST with contextual analysis that prioritizes what is exploitable and impactful in your codebase, then helps engineers remediate fast. Instead of “find everything and hope someone sorts it out,” DryRun Security delivers code security intelligence that is ready to act on. DryRun Security puts a security engineer directly into developer workflows. In pull requests, the Code Review Agent reviews changes in context, explains risk in plain language, and guides fixes where developers already work. In repos, the DeepScan Agent produces focused, human-grade findings for the issues that actually matter, without weeks of manual review before major milestones. The Custom Policy Agent enforces guardrails with Natural Language Code Policies, so you can standardize security and compliance requirements across teams without brittle rule sets. Codebase Insights allows leaders to ask questions of their entire codebase like &quot;Are we exposed to this new vulnerability&quot; and have confidence in minutes. DryRun Security also integrates with AI coding workflows, so remediation happens with the precision of a security engineer working at machine speed. Teams connect DryRun Security insights and guidance into Claude, Cursor, OpenAI Codex, and Windsurf, helping developers and their agents fix issues with contextual, security-engineered direction tied to the PR and codebase. What DryRun Security delivers (beyond SAST) • Automated secure code review in every pull request with high-signal findings and low noise • Contextual Security Analysis that catches common vulnerabilities and deeper multi-dependency and logic risks • Automated remediation guidance that helps engineers fix faster, with explanations and next steps • Secrets analysis identifies genuine hardcoded secrets and suppresses the usual false alarms • Policy enforcement in PRs using Natural Language Code Policies for consistent guardrails across repos • Codebase intelligence and reporting for AppSec visibility, prioritization, and audit-ready evidence DryRun Security supports most code environments, languages, and frameworks, including: • GitHub, GitLab • C#, Golang, Elixir, JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Ruby, Java, Kotlin, PHP, Swift, HTML • Infrastructure as Code (Terraform, YAML) • And more



## DryRun Security Pros & Cons
**What users like:**

- Users value the **quick and context-aware feedback** from DryRun Security, effectively mitigating vulnerabilities in GitHub pull requests. (13 reviews)
- Users appreciate the **context-aware vulnerability detection** of DryRun Security, enabling swift and accurate identification of risks. (9 reviews)
- Users value the **seamless integration and effective detections** of DryRun Security, enhancing code security and developer workflow. (8 reviews)
- Users highlight the **accuracy** of DryRun Security in identifying vulnerabilities with context-aware feedback, significantly reducing false positives. (7 reviews)
- Users commend the **easy setup** of DryRun Security, enabling seamless integration into their existing workflows effortlessly. (7 reviews)
- Code Quality (6 reviews)
- Setup Ease (6 reviews)
- Integrations (5 reviews)
- Code Review (4 reviews)
- Speed (4 reviews)

**What users dislike:**

- Users experience **slow performance** with DryRun Security&#39;s management portal, impacting usability and efficiency. (2 reviews)
- Users experience **slow speed** with the management portal, affecting usability and efficiency during operation. (2 reviews)
- Users note that **UI performance issues** can hinder their experience, impacting the overall effectiveness of DryRun Security. (2 reviews)
- Users desire more **customization options** for tuning analyzers, but improvements are anticipated in future updates. (1 reviews)
- Users desire greater focus on **workflow issues** to enhance developer experience and improve overall adoption of DryRun Security. (1 reviews)

## DryRun Security Reviews
  ### 1. Next Gen of SAST Tool That Has Cutting Edge Tech

**Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Francis D. | Lead AppSec Eng, Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

**Reviewed Date:** March 10, 2026

**What do you like best about DryRun Security?**

Very easy to set up and has takes in Github permissions making me worry less about what people have permission on. This SAST tool is a cutting edge and utilizes AI in a proper way allowing us to plug and play the tool into repo and get findings on it consistently across the repos we worry about. Chatting with the sec team + dev team we can see it provides value that other SAST tools haven't provided but also isn't noisy and high accurate letting find very critical bugs that have been missed in the past.

**What do you dislike about DryRun Security?**

Nothing really. Had minor issues with missing common SAST features (dismissal, long PR comments) but Dry Run's team really steps up their game and take in customer feedback to consistently improve and make the product suit the customer as much as possible.

**What problems is DryRun Security solving and how is that benefiting you?**

Better experience with SAST and a lot more accurate allowing for a pleasant experience.

  ### 2. Catches Logic and Authorization Flaws Traditional SAST Often Misses

**Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Jabez A. | Director, Product Security Architecture, Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

**Reviewed Date:** February 13, 2026

**What do you like best about DryRun Security?**

We use traditional SAST tools, but they mostly depend on rule-based static analysis. DryRun Security, by contrast, focuses on understanding code intent and logical flow, which makes it effective at finding authorization flaws, broken object-level authorization, insecure direct object reference, and insecure business logic. As AI assistants such as Cursor or ChatGPT-based tools become more widely adopted, we face new risks from AI-authored code. DryRun Security helps us focus specifically on the logic flaws that can show up in AI-generated code snippets—issues that traditional scanners often miss.

**What do you dislike about DryRun Security?**

This isn’t necessarily about the DryRun functionality itself, but it would be ideal to have DryRun Security available as a Marketplace offering in the cloud provider we use. That would make integration, renewal, and onboarding smoother and easier overall.

**What problems is DryRun Security solving and how is that benefiting you?**

We’re working to move toward a more developer-driven, integrated security process. For us, that means having a tool that’s deeply integrated into our Gitflow and can run in parallel with what developers are doing day in and day out. Beyond the contextual protection we’re getting, DryRun also helps reduce the number of external screens developers have to jump to in order to get the security insights they need.

  ### 3. AppSec signal, not noise: DryRun catches the ‘Greeks in the horse’ PRs before they ship

**Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Todd B. | CISO, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

**Reviewed Date:** February 11, 2026

**What do you like best about DryRun Security?**

DryRun Security gives me high-signal visibility into the changes that actually matter. The out-of-the-box analyzers help me quickly spot unexpected or risky behavior in pull requests without having to manually comb through everything. It’s become a practical way to scale AppSec review when PR volume is high—especially for catching edge cases that could create real operational or compliance impact.

I also appreciate how quickly the team is iterating: they’re regularly adding meaningful functionality, improving false-positive handling, and behaving like thought leaders in the AppSec space rather than “just another scanner.” Their continued momentum toward/through GRC certifications is a strong indicator they’re building for serious organizations, not hobby deployments.

Getting it installed was SO simple. We didn't need to tweak much, but once we started it got even better!

If the citizens of Troy had used DryRun Security, the Greeks never would have made it in.

**What do you dislike about DryRun Security?**

I don’t have many dislikes. If I had to pick one, it would be that I’d love to see even more investment in the developer experience and day-to-day workflow fit—making it a tool developers want to use, not one that security has to continually champion. It’s already valuable, but increasing developer pull (UX, messaging in PRs, “why it matters” context, smoother adoption) would make it even stickier.

**What problems is DryRun Security solving and how is that benefiting you?**

DryRun Security is solving the “too many PRs, not enough attention” problem—helping us detect the small number of changes that are genuinely risky, unusual, or non-compliant without forcing security or operations to read everything line-by-line. That directly reduces review fatigue and time-to-decision while increasing confidence that we aren’t missing the one PR that could cause a serious incident.

In our environment, it helps surface issues that could impact compliance and reliability—like changes that might enable non-compliant domain behavior or destabilize critical infrastructure dependencies (e.g., DNS-related risks). The practical benefit is fewer blind spots, faster reviews, and a stronger security posture without requiring a larger AppSec team.

  ### 4. Deep Scan Delivers Insightful, Low-Noise Findings for Massive Legacy Codebases

**Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Roger W. | Expert Software Engineer, Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

**Reviewed Date:** February 11, 2026

**What do you like best about DryRun Security?**

The new Deep Scan feature, which performs a comprehensive review of our application, was incredibly helpful for identifying issues in a legacy application with millions of lines of code.  Over the 20+ years of this application's lifespan, we've had several audits and 3rd-party reviews.  DryRun's AI had a better grasp of the code's business intent and overall structure than most previous auditors.  I expected a firehose of findings, most of which would be false positives or non-issues.  However, the report listed 20 or so items to check, only one of which was a complete false positive. We're still tuning the engine for our uses, but the PR reviews have been helpful and insightful.

**What do you dislike about DryRun Security?**

Their UI can be a bit sluggish, especially when there are many linked GitLab repositories.  It's pretty clear they've been spending most of their time on the scanning engines, and the UI was a lower priority.  However, that seems to be clearing up, as the UI has improved. Ideally, you shouldn't need to use it much once it's up and running; you can just let it work directly with your repo.

**What problems is DryRun Security solving and how is that benefiting you?**

Most static scanners are so full of false positives that they're almost worthless when working with legacy codebases. The rise of AI-driven attacks is chilling, and it's reassuring to have something in place on our side that has been delivering measurable results.

  ### 5. DryRun’s Context-Aware Scanning Beats Legacy SAST

**Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Dan C. | CTO, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

**Reviewed Date:** February 13, 2026

**What do you like best about DryRun Security?**

DryRun's use of LLMs and inclusion of context about the application makes it perform far better than traditional SAST tools. It is able to find "business logic" vulnerabilities that the legacy SAST scanners are simply unable to find and it better characterizes all of its results based on the application context it ingests.

**What do you dislike about DryRun Security?**

Up until recently, you could only do pull request-level scans. Recently they added the ability to do full-repository scans so I'm excited to see how this capability evolves.

**What problems is DryRun Security solving and how is that benefiting you?**

DryRun helps us embed security into the development process in a way that is really accessible to our development team but also visible to the security team. This helps make sure we're finding and addressing vulnerabilities before they make their way into production and gives the security team confidence that security concerns are front-of-mind for developers.

  ### 6. As a security company, we have come to rely on it

**Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Jonathan C. | CTO, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

**Reviewed Date:** February 18, 2026

**What do you like best about DryRun Security?**

I use it every day. We review anywhere from 5-50 PRs. Higher on a good day. We use any of the code review agents, but DryRun is the one we specifically rely on to review the security of the code

**What do you dislike about DryRun Security?**

Until recently, we could only use it on a PR by PR basis. They've added a repo review (or rather an entire codebase review), but I haven't had a chance to test it yet.

**What problems is DryRun Security solving and how is that benefiting you?**

As a security company, we have to ship secure code. It finds issues that others don't find. We've tried many different code review agents. They all find things, but DryRun specifically and continuously finds more in-depth security issues than others.

  ### 7. High-Signal Security Reviews Right in the Developer Workflow

**Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Verified User in Retail | Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

**Reviewed Date:** May 06, 2026

**What do you like best about DryRun Security?**

DryRun Security helps solve the problem of noisy and time-consuming security reviews by providing contextual, high-signal findings directly in the developer workflow. Instead of spending unnecessary time sorting through false positives or trying to determine which issues are actually exploitable, the platform uses AI-driven analysis to help identify the risks that actually matter and explain them in a way developers can act on. Its performance has also been a benefit, as it fits well into the pull request process without creating unnecessary friction or slowing down development.

It also helps bridge the gap between security and development teams. By providing AI-powered remediation guidance, pull request context, and policy-based guardrails, DryRun Security makes it easier to maintain security standards while still allowing teams to move quickly. The support experience has been another positive, with helpful guidance when questions come up or when we need assistance getting more value from the platform. Overall, DryRun Security supports faster, more confident development while giving security teams better visibility into code risk across repositories.

**What do you dislike about DryRun Security?**

The main thing I would like to see improved is broader integration with external workflow and ticket management platforms, especially Jira. While DryRun Security provides useful findings and guidance in the developer workflow, having a more seamless way to create, track, and manage security tickets in Jira would make it easier for teams that rely heavily on Jira for vulnerability management, sprint planning, and remediation tracking. Stronger integrations with external platforms would help security and engineering teams operationalize findings more effectively across their existing processes.

**What problems is DryRun Security solving and how is that benefiting you?**

DryRun Security helps solve the problem of noisy and time-consuming security reviews by providing contextual, high-signal findings directly in the developer workflow. Instead of spending unnecessary time sorting through false positives or trying to determine which issues are actually exploitable, the platform uses AI-driven analysis to help identify the risks that actually matter and explain them in a way developers can act on. Its performance has also been a benefit, as it fits well into the pull request process without creating unnecessary friction or slowing down development.

It also helps bridge the gap between security and development teams. By providing AI-powered remediation guidance, pull request context, and policy-based guardrails, DryRun Security makes it easier to maintain security standards while still allowing teams to move quickly. The support experience has been another positive, with helpful guidance when questions come up or when we need assistance getting more value from the platform. Overall, DryRun Security supports faster, more confident development while giving security teams better visibility into code risk across repositories.

  ### 8. Spearheading Secure Code Development with Innovative Analysis

**Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Brian J.

**Reviewed Date:** February 12, 2026

**What do you like best about DryRun Security?**

The team at DryRun Security has been wonderful to work with, and the technology is seamless to integrate. It provides valuable and ever-improving detections and allows us to accelerate secure code development, especially in the era of AI accelerating code creation. They are really innovating with agentic detections in software, not just static pattern matching like traditional SAST vendors, and can do multidimensional analysis across a wide range of contexts. This helps catch problems that would be otherwise impossible to detect with existing technology and makes our code even more secure against complex and emerging threats like prompt injection or IDOR. Additionally, integration with Impart Security's runtime protection platform is seamless, providing an end to end AI native solution. The initial setup of DryRun Security was very easy.

**What do you dislike about DryRun Security?**

I would love to see DryRun Security scan more of the codebase, not just pull requests. I believe they have recently launched a new feature called deepscan, and I would like the DryRun approach to be used in evaluating the entire repo so that I can get a sense of not just new code but also existing code security.

**What problems is DryRun Security solving and how is that benefiting you?**

I use DryRun Security to review pull requests for security vulnerabilities, improving code quality and preventing unidentified risks from merging. It accelerates secure code development with valuable detections and innovative multidimensional analysis, protecting against complex threats.

  ### 9. Efficient Code Review with Quick Feature Adaptations

**Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Kyle R.

**Reviewed Date:** February 11, 2026

**What do you like best about DryRun Security?**

I use DryRun Security to identify issues for security review or improvement as our engineering team commits a lot of code. It helps me be aware of risky changes to the codebase and assists with code security reviews. My favorite thing about DryRun is that it allows me to focus on other tasks rather than reviewing code changes and PRs all the time. I appreciate that their team is fairly quick to make feature request changes and listens to customer feedback. The initial setup was very easy and smooth, and there's really nothing like it at the moment — it's great.

**What do you dislike about DryRun Security?**

I do somewhat wish there were more customization options for tuning the analyzers, but that seems to be in the works.

**What problems is DryRun Security solving and how is that benefiting you?**

I use DryRun Security to identify risky changes and aid in code security reviews, allowing me to focus on other tasks rather than constantly reviewing code changes.

  ### 10. One-Time Setup, Automatic Repo Scans, and Actionable PR Comments

**Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Chenkai G. | Security Engineer, Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

**Reviewed Date:** February 12, 2026

**What do you like best about DryRun Security?**

Setup is a one-time process, and any new repos are scanned automatically. Findings appear as PR comments, which makes them easy for developers to notice, review, and act on.

Deepscan feels like a step forward for establishing a baseline for repo security standards and for uncovering issues in legacy repos.

**What do you dislike about DryRun Security?**

The management portal is still slow to use, and the loading time is noticeably slow by modern standards.

**What problems is DryRun Security solving and how is that benefiting you?**

It solves several things. First, it automatically covers new repos in scope without any human intervention. Second, feedback and findings show up directly as PR comments, so devs don’t need to jump to another tool or dashboard just to view them.

  ### 11. Seamless Pipeline Integration with Near Real-Time Vulnerability Feedback

**Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Josh S. | CEO / CISO, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

**Reviewed Date:** February 06, 2026

**What do you like best about DryRun Security?**

DryRun Security easily integrates into our existing build pipeline so that scans happen automatically and our developers get near real-time feedback on vulnerabilities in their code.

**What do you dislike about DryRun Security?**

There is nothing that I really dislike about DryRun Security.  Even in situations where I've found what I believed to be a bug in the product, they were very quick to investigate and come back to me with a solution.

**What problems is DryRun Security solving and how is that benefiting you?**

We are a small team and performing manual code reviews across all of our new and legacy code is challenging.  DryRun acts like a Senior Security Engineer, reading our PRs, understanding the context, finding issues and coming up with a plan of action to address them.

  ### 12. DryRun Supercharges AppSec with Context-Aware, Actionable PR Feedback

**Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** John P. | SecOps Engineer, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

**Reviewed Date:** February 18, 2026

**What do you like best about DryRun Security?**

DryRun has been a strong force multiplier for our AppSec process. It analyzes changes in context (not just pattern matching), flags issues early in pull requests, and delivers feedback in a way engineers can act on quickly. We’ve seen fewer false positives vs. legacy SAST approaches, which makes it easier to build trust with dev teams.

**What do you dislike about DryRun Security?**

Full-repo scanning is an area I’d like to see expanded. I know it’s already on the roadmap, and I’m looking forward to deeper whole-repository coverage in addition to PR/change-based analysis.

**What problems is DryRun Security solving and how is that benefiting you?**

DryRun helps us catch meaningful security risk before merge, while cutting down the review bottleneck and reducing noise fatigue.

  ### 13. Streamlined Security with Seamless Workflow Integration

**Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Justin L.

**Reviewed Date:** February 11, 2026

**What do you like best about DryRun Security?**

I use DryRun Security to look at my code for security vulnerabilities. It helps me deliver secure code to production, and I love its ease of use as it already plugs into the workflow I am used to. It's fast and lets me keep on working without having to compile my code and wait hours for a scan to finish. DryRun looks at my changes in the PR and determines if we are introducing risks to our application. The initial setup was really easy.

**What do you dislike about DryRun Security?**

There isn't anything to dislike

**What problems is DryRun Security solving and how is that benefiting you?**

I use DryRun Security to identify code vulnerabilities and deliver secure code to production. It's easy to use, integrates well with my workflow, and saves time by analyzing changes in pull requests without lengthy code compilation.

  ### 14. Fast, Context-Aware Security Feedback Right in GitHub Pull Requests

**Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** John P. | Director Of Engineering, Information Technology and Services, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

**Reviewed Date:** February 17, 2026

**What do you like best about DryRun Security?**

DryRun Security runs and provides feedback where we do our work: GitHub. Feedback is provided quickly within the context of the Pull request. This helps our team mitigate vulnerabilities before they are deployed.Vulnerabilities are reported in a context-aware manner, which reduces the number of false positives.

**What do you dislike about DryRun Security?**

Pricing requires contacting the team, and I typically prefer transparent pricing models. With that being said, the team is incredibly helpful, and quick to turn around price quotes.

**What problems is DryRun Security solving and how is that benefiting you?**

DryRun helps us mitigate Application Vulnerabilities prior to application deployment.

  ### 15. Effortless SAST with Contextual Insights

**Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Adam D.

**Reviewed Date:** February 09, 2026

**What do you like best about DryRun Security?**

I like DryRun Security for its ease of use, even when managing hundreds of repositories. I appreciate that security findings are surfaced directly to the engineer in the GitHub comment with valuable context. This context is crucial as it helps engineers understand the true root causes and risks, beyond just fixing another bug. Setting it up was as simple as installing a GitHub app.

**What do you dislike about DryRun Security?**

Everything thus far has been working as expected. In terms of improvement, support monolithic repos would be the most helpful thing, but I know that feature is coming soon.

**What problems is DryRun Security solving and how is that benefiting you?**

I use DryRun Security to cover multiple programming languages, ensuring compliance and secure code development. It surfaces security findings directly in GitHub comments, providing essential context, which helps us address vulnerabilities effectively.

  ### 16. DryRun Security Delivers Rich Code Security Context and Intelligence

**Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Patrick M. | VP, Security, Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

**Reviewed Date:** February 19, 2026

**What do you like best about DryRun Security?**

DryRun security gives us a ton of context and intelligence around our code security that typical scanners don't give us.

**What do you dislike about DryRun Security?**

Nothing comes to mind. We use this for internal security and customer security facing reports.

**What problems is DryRun Security solving and how is that benefiting you?**

DryRun is adding another layer of intelligence to our security assessment capabilities. We use this for internal security enhancements, and we package some of this data up for customer facing reports.

  ### 17. DryRun Keeps AI Code Fast and Secure with Pre-Merge Reviews

**Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Verified User in Computer Software | Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

**Reviewed Date:** February 13, 2026

**What do you like best about DryRun Security?**

DryRun helps us keep up with the pace of AI code generation while ensuring that any code our developers check in goes through a security review before it’s merged.

**What do you dislike about DryRun Security?**

To get the most out of this product, as with any product, you need to devote time to working with it. The out-of-the-box policies are solid, but with a bit more time we could write more natural-language code policies tailored to specific use cases.

**What problems is DryRun Security solving and how is that benefiting you?**

DryRun is allowing us to complete security code reviews much more quickly than we were able to before. A review that used to take two weeks is now done in a few days.

  ### 18. Good Use Case for AI

**Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Verified User in Retail | Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

**Reviewed Date:** April 17, 2026

**What do you like best about DryRun Security?**

Since its agentic and doesn't depend on rules, theres good coverage across any language, framework, or tool out of the box. It's been particularly helpful providing feedback to engineers on changes to infra level concerns like terraform or helm.

**What do you dislike about DryRun Security?**

No major downsides, just needs some refinement as it grows. Slack alerts can be a bit noisy, for example. Thus far the team has sought feedback frequently and eventually comes up with solutions.

**What problems is DryRun Security solving and how is that benefiting you?**

Scaling rich, contextual security feedback for engineers without slowing down our velocity. Critical issues are rare to start with in our environment, but it has flagged a few at the PR stage before they get merged, which is also great.

  ### 19. DryRun Surfaces Actionable Security Issues with Helpful PR Context

**Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Verified User in Computer & Network Security | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

**Reviewed Date:** April 16, 2026

**What do you like best about DryRun Security?**

DryRun is better than any static code analyzer we’ve used. It consistently surfaces real security concerns in PRs, provides helpful context, and makes the findings actionable.

**What do you dislike about DryRun Security?**

The scans can be a little slower compared to a static analyzer which is expected and acceptable.

**What problems is DryRun Security solving and how is that benefiting you?**

Shorting security reviews for our team as we are moving to more AI assisted development and shipping more code per engineer.

  ### 20. Automated Repo Scans That Save Time and Boost Security

**Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Verified User in Information Technology and Services | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

**Reviewed Date:** February 12, 2026

**What do you like best about DryRun Security?**

Having automated scans directly in our repos saves so much time and helps make us secure.

**What do you dislike about DryRun Security?**

Personally I have not run into any issues on DRS that I do not like!

**What problems is DryRun Security solving and how is that benefiting you?**

It is helping us solve issues in our org with any issues inside of our code and helping us grabbing all of the issues during the PR. It is super easy to implement in the org making it a no brainer to use.



- [View DryRun Security pricing details and edition comparison](https://www.g2.com/products/dryrun-security/reviews?section=pricing&secure%5Bexpires_at%5D=2026-05-17+10%3A07%3A46+-0500&secure%5Bsession_id%5D=2b59aeed-4d97-4c48-8148-50d9212dddd4&secure%5Btoken%5D=a58326edb61e6ae15e43fceaef8c4986e159ebbb9020bda3d5cb322cd728b36b&format=llm_user)
## DryRun Security Integrations
  - [Claude Code](https://www.g2.com/products/anthropic-claude-code/reviews)
  - [GitHub](https://www.g2.com/products/github/reviews)
  - [GitLab](https://www.g2.com/products/gitlab/reviews)
  - [Slack Connector for Jira](https://www.g2.com/products/slack-connector-for-jira/reviews)

## DryRun Security Features
**Administration**
- API / Integrations
- Extensibility

**Documentation**
- Feedback
- Prioritization
- Remediation Suggestions

**Security**
- Tampering
- Malicious Code
- Verification
- Security Risks

**Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis**
- Adaptive Learning
- Natural Language Interaction
- Proactive Assistance

**Performance - AI AppSec Assistants**
- Remediation
- Real-time Vulnerability Detection
- Accuracy

**Analysis**
- Reporting and Analytics
- Issue Tracking
- Static Code Analysis
- Code Analysis

**Security**
- False Positives
- Custom Compliance
- Agility

**Tracking**
- Bill of Materials
- Audit Trails
- Monitoring

**Integration - AI AppSec Assistants**
- Stack Integration
- Workflow Integration
- Codebase Contextual Awareness

**Testing**
- Command-Line Tools
- Manual Testing
- Test Automation
- Compliance Testing
- Black-Box Scanning
- Detection Rate

**Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)**
- Autonomous Task Execution

## Top DryRun Security Alternatives
  - [GitHub](https://www.g2.com/products/github/reviews) - 4.7/5.0 (2,280 reviews)
  - [GitLab](https://www.g2.com/products/gitlab/reviews) - 4.5/5.0 (874 reviews)
  - [Replit](https://www.g2.com/products/replit/reviews) - 4.5/5.0 (348 reviews)

