It helps me build and write code more efficiently, and I can easily connect my GitHub account with Devin. The interface is smooth, with a simple, easy-to-use UI.

Overall, it’s one of the best AI coding tools, although the pricing is a little pricey. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It tends to slow down during long coding sessions, and it doesn’t consistently deliver solutions to real-world problems or issues. Also, if the code isn’t reviewed properly, it can still make mistakes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Devin is a great AI "toy" that let me and my 10 years old son creating software project together. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Free version can't process image file in program. I created some game character movement images, wanted Devin to combine it into game editing on Devin, Devin says over quota, after I but the plan, it can't be done. Devin AI sometimes will make mistake and the bug can't fixed by itself. I am used to make copy manually, preparing Devin making mistake. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As a nontechnical user, I’m able to self-serve far more than I could before. I can use plain language to pull real, impactful data and even create PRs to update company-wide dashboards. I also love using the Slack app, because it keeps working with Devin embedded in my day-to-day tools. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes I’m surprised by how long Devin takes to respond to a query. I often end up putting the work down and coming back later, which leads to a lot of task and context switching. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best about Devin AI is its ability to handle complex development tasks independently while keeping the workflow smooth and efficient. It saves time on repetitive work and helps our team focus on higher-value tasks. Yes, I believe Devin AI is worth the price for teams that want to improve development efficiency and reduce time spent on repetitive tasks. The productivity gains and faster turnaround on projects provide strong value for the investment. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One drawback is that Devin AI can occasionally require additional guidance or review for highly specific or nuanced tasks, but its capabilities continue to improve over time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The UI and I think the SWE model is from Devin. And the monthly starting price is reasonable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's missing a build in browser so that I can direct the AI better to where I want to bring changes Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best about Devin AI is that it can handle coding tasks like debugging, writing code, and planning steps with less manual effort, which helps save time and improve productivity. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I dislike about Devin AI is that it may not always understand complex requirements perfectly and sometimes needs human review to fix errors or improve the final output. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

For me, the absolute best thing about Devin is its complete autonomy and the way it handles the entire end-to-end automation process without needing me to babysit it. I can simply drop in a link to the test suite from Azure DevOps, and it takes it from there. It logs into the application, finds the UI elements, and writes the Java code in the local Eclipse setup we have on its machine. The fact that it can run the tests and keep healing the script until it passes is a massive time-saver. I can have five different sessions running in parallel, which means I’m getting a whole week’s worth of manual automation done in a single day.

Ease of use is genuinely high because it’s mostly just natural-language prompting. I don’t have to write code snippets the way I do with other ai tools; I just explain the logic and it does the rest. Implementation was a bit more of a project, though, because setting up the dedicated machine with Eclipse and the right paths for our Azure Git repo took some time. Once that was done, everything has been smooth. The integration with Azure DevOps is surprisingly good as well, since it has a native way to handle those connections through the secrets manager and PAT.

I use Devin almost every single day now for any new test case development. The feature set is impressive, especially how it creates its own computing environment and uses its own browser to analyze the UI. It feels more like an actual teammate than just a tool. Customer support has been fairly responsive when I’ve hit those weird ACU consumption bugs, although most of the time I can figure things out from the logs Devin provides.

Like I mentioned, it’s not perfect. Sometimes it gets overexcited and changes core framework methods, which is something I have to watch out for in every PR. And that deviation after 50 ACU is definitely annoying, because it starts to ignore the initial logic. Still, as a tester who wants to scale up automation quickly, these feel like small prices to pay for the amount of work it gets done. It has completely changed how I manage my sprint tasks. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It keeps messing with things it shouldn’t touch. There have been several times when it decided to refactor our core pre-built methods in the automation framework, even though it was only supposed to write a simple test script. That’s frustrating because I then have to spend extra time during PR review double-checking that it didn’t break some global logic that all our other tests depend on. It’s like it gets overexcited and tries to be too helpful, but it ends up creating more work for me to verify.

The other major issue is how it starts to deviate after a long session. I’ve noticed that once the ACU consumption hits around 40 or 50, Devin really starts to lose the plot. It begins ignoring the initial instructions I gave it, and the logic starts drifting in weird directions. It feels like the model gets tired and forgets the original goal of the session. I usually have to kill the session and start a completely fresh one just to get it back to being productive, which is a bit of a waste of time.

I also find the initial setup for the dedicated machine and secrets a bit tedious. Since it doesn’t have direct access to Azure DevOps, I have to manage all the creds and PATs as secrets inside Devin, which is just another thing to keep track of. And while it’s impressive that it can run Eclipse locally and debug its own code, execution speed can sometimes be slow compared to a human just running the script. Overall, it’s a great tool, but the overreaching code changes and the reliability issues in long sessions are definitely the biggest downsides for me. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Devin for all my daily coding and planning tasks and it almost correct 99% time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing as common but sometimes few shortcuts works wrongly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like how it can take on complete development tasks instead of just suggesting code. It feels like a real productivity boost. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes it need a bit more context to get things exactly right , so i still review everything before moving forward. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Using Devin it's super easy to delegate small tasks Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The UI can be complex some times, it has many features sometimes a bit too hidden. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.