DeepSource Reviews & Product Details

DeepSource not only has the capability to analyze the issues and bad practices in the code but also offers AutoFix for them.

The application deploys a bot to the repository, which creates pull requests to fix issues in the code.

The platform is straightforward to use and can manage multiple repositories simultaneously. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The app is easy to integrate with the repository, but one has to regularly check the performance risks and issues in the code on their platform. The process is not too time-consuming, but an automated system would be appreciated in future releases. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Really like the code health and formatting features. Particularly the formatting. Really useful to help you in readability. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There aren't any really, only when it tells you that you did something wrong! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Deepsource empowers developers to write clean, maintainable and quality code. It's easy to deploy, manage, and configure and hassle-free. It can be self hosted, makes automatic PRs to format and fix code and graphs valuable charts to indicate your code security posture. Support for a lot of languages Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing. But I need to fulfill the required word count Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Completely automatic review of my code anytime I have a new pull request. It is like having someone proofread all of my code every time I want to push an update. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes the criticality of the vulnerability is overrated, but this is only because my specific project is 100% clientside. The code needs fixed either way, so only a minor issue. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I decided to give deepsource a try and integrated it into one of my open-source projects.

It has been a very helpful tool to ensure the source remains healthy. It is a great tool for open source maintainers and code reviewers. It allows you to identify more areas in the code that be improved.

It is very easy to set up and very customizable. No need to set up and maintain CLIs on CI. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Has limited language support. Including analyzers for more languages would be great Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We have been using DeepSource for six months now. I can see the difference in the code style and the code quality of the files that have gone through DeepSource and not gone through DeepSource. There's a clear difference in the way indentation happens or the number of whitespaces that are left, or the number of columns that are present in the code.

If you compare, if you take the difference between these two files, there will definitely appear a difference between the files that have been processed through DeepSource and the files that have not been processed. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We would like to see the support added for multiple files for the Autofix feature. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Developers can rely on DeepSource as a tool to look at the small nits issues – things that might create a security problem or a performance problem going forward; or maybe some formatting issues or if we're violating a best practice, etc. All that gets codified into DeepSource. As developers, for code reviews, we can focus on higher-order bits where we talk about things like code design or the algorithm being used. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Getting started with large codebases can be a bit difficult with DeepSource. In particular PRs, the DeepSource bot might end up throwing a lot of alerts even if only 10 lines were changed. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

DeepSource fits easily into InsurTechnix's workflow, and gives us confidence in the quality of the code we deploy to our customers. InsurTechnix builds software for advanced cross-platform cyber-hygiene. Because our customers trust InsurTechnix to analyse their most sensitive data we believe in defence-in-depth at all levels of our product. DeepSource's highly detailed automated analysis is a excellent complement to high-level peer review of source code PRs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Only cosmetic issues - e.g. the need to log in to DeepSource even when clicking through a link from GitLab. We find that the quality of the automated reviews is very high. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

- Easy to integrate into existing codebase (their auto-PR feature now works on BitBucket repositories too)

- Plenty of actionable, valuable suggestions to improve the codebase

- Auto-PR with fixes for entire classes of linting errors is a killer feature!

- Consolidate linting/fomatting/implementing certain best practices in one place

- Generous free plan

DeepSource has led to the Edyst team having more productive conversations around our code, better PRs.

Highly Recommend! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

No support for Elixir (yet). Though this isn't a major gripe as such, the DeepSource team seems responsive to requests.

The analyzer times out occasionally. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Deepsource is easy to set up on GitHub and in minutes, you can have it running on your repos. It has several features but they are organized in a modular way. For example, I use only basic static analysis, and I am free to ignore features I don't care (e.g., transformers, autofixes). I use it for Python and I appreciate the explanations for the issues found. It is likely that using Deepsource improved my Python skills.

DISCLAIMER: I was promised a 20$ Amazon Gift Card to write this review. This has nudged me to write the review, but everything I write corresponds to what I think and it has not been influenced by the monetary reward. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The official badge does not have the same style of all the other common badges, so it doesn't look as nice on the README. I tried setting up other features like autofixes, but I found them intrusive. I also found that very often I understand the code much better than Deepsource, so I prefer fixing the problems manually. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.