Contentstack Reviews & Product Details

Composability, great support from our Customer Success Manager. Lots of documentation online and resources to self serve. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

A lot of our struggles have come from customizations we’ve done and learning the best ways to optimize our sustem Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Easy and quick process to import information and publish it. You can look up past publishes as well which is helpful if you forget the progress to copy. We use unique identifiers for each campaign for some of our brands. So this is a very essential tool to ensure tracking is being passed down. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is hard to know what information you exactly need for each entry. There are a lot of entry spots, but we don't use them all Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I love that it is a headless CMS that allows us to separate content management from delevopment roadblocks Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There is a lot to navigate to work through initial setup/implementation Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The new UI is really smooth and improved from the older experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Translation management could be improved to be easier to use. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The rich of API and Multiplatform support Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Mobile support can be improved, for example support for iOS and Android Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Graphql apis for content delivery is something I like the most.

Support team is very good and they help us in every way possible. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

* Content stack editor UI has a lot of small bugs and its not very informative about what went wrong.

* Some of the feature needs to be upgraded like sorting of entries based on custom fields instead of just update date and create date in graphql apis

* Content stack editor UI has plugin support for creating custom features that is good but the same is lacking basic features like table properties, etc. Hence users need to create custom plugins for basic features Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Contentstack works well with content for different countries, and can handle the load of differing languages flowing in and out with somewhat ease of use. I like that for product content publishes to be successful, that the lines turn green which is helpful to the eye within the stack. Assessing some of the errors and pinpointing where to fix within the product page is user friendly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The errors that transfer between systems are unexplainable and don't leave the user with much help to remedy the issues. Product content flowing between systems can take longer than 15-20 minutes, causing the user to resend content again into Contentstack. This creates an overflow of unnecessary buildup of data and slows down the "stack" overall. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Ability to Customize the dashboard with various extensions, mission control, documentation, and low-code or no-code APIs, along with an ever-growing marketplace of extensions, languages, sites, scalability, availability, environments, webhooks etc... Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Clients migrating from Legacy CMS applications may find Contentstack's reference publishing feature and Dashboard navigation lacking specific controls. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Developer friendly.

Authoring Friendly.

Developer/Author Commenting/discussions on fields level.

Can be accessed anywhere.

Rest API support.

Good customer support

Easy to integrate.

Support for GraphQL is good. Have to improve.

Very flexible to create content models.

User friendly UI.

Workflow easy to configure.

Ease use of Roles and ACL Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

1. There is no Navigation support, like If I need to have site nav in the front end.

2. The level of nesting is restricted till level 4. maximum reference depth limit should be more.

3. Unpubished content is not accessible more than 1 nested level in CMA API.

4. The UID is not same within different branch level.

5. The UID is not same within different stack level.

6. There should be an UID which should be same accross all branch and all stack for a content (It can be unique within Organisational level)

7. The Title change of a content creates a new entry on migration to another branch or stack.

8. Front end Branch merge should be there with a Rollback option.

9. Front end content stack to stack migration should be there.

10. The limit of nested entries should be more than 100 count.

11. There should be a Rollback option of Content Types.

12. Automation hub execution is costly.

13. The customization of OOB should be allowed more.

14. Taxonomy should allow the content to be mapped under another content.

15. Timely backup should be there. or restore point should be there.

16. RTE should have more features. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like that it's easy to use and manage content. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are so many features it can be overwhelming understanding its capabilities. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.