Its user friendly and simplifies organization techniques to make better use of data Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing, its a really really good program. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I worked with ContentDM in a Digital Libraries course in graduate school along with two other competitive tools. ContentDM was my favorite of the three. I created a collection with audio and images and descriptive metadata. It was easy to navigate, build, organize, and customize. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Honestly, I don't think there was anything I was frustrated with when using this tool. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

CONTENTdm is very easy to use for managing digitization projects. Inputting metadata, managing digital files, and linking documents are straight forward processes with this software. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I do not have any dislikes about the software at this time Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like how it puts digital publishing into student, faculty and a library hands. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's buggy in some of the cataloging sections but tolerable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Easy out of the box.I am not aware of a better alternative. It handles single items and compound objects. Allows for large batch uploading an editing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Visual display is poor though getting better. I really dislike the small thumbnails in tw browse section Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

flexibility. access to php files give technical personnel a lot of flexibility Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

search behavior and search index seems to be very clunky. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.