--- title: On-Screen Takeoff® Reviews meta_title: 'On-Screen Takeoff® Reviews 2026: Details, Pricing, & Features | G2' meta_description: Filter 160 reviews by the users' company size, role or industry to find out how On-Screen Takeoff® works for a business like yours. aggregate_rating: rating_value: 4.4 review_count: 160 scale: '5' date_modified: '2026-10-17' parent_category: name: Construction Management url: https://www.g2.com/categories/construction-management ---

On-Screen Takeoff® Reviews & Product Details

Value at a Glance

Averages based on real user reviews.

Time to Implement

1 month

On-Screen Takeoff® Reviews (160)

View 1 Video Reviews
Reviews

On-Screen Takeoff® Reviews (160)

View 1 Video Reviews
4.4
160 reviews

What do users say?

Generated using AI from real user reviews
Users consistently praise the ease of use and speed of takeoffs with On-Screen Takeoff, highlighting its intuitive interface that allows for quick learning and efficient project management. Many appreciate the ability to keep data local, which enhances their confidence in the software, although some note that the integration of AI features could improve. Overall, it is regarded as a reliable tool for accurate estimating.

Pros & Cons

Generated from real user reviews
View All Pros and Cons
Search reviews
Filter Reviews
Clear Results
G2 reviews are authentic and verified.
Keith W.
KW
Keith W.
Sergeant
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"A unconventional approach to conventional estimating."
5/5
What do you like best about On-Screen Takeoff®?

OST has a quick setup process for each product. It provides the ability to calculate the BOM right out of the box in ways our unconventional construction requires. The software also allows us to integrate our building systems into an automated interface. Its speed in generating quantities that are not typical gets us too a bid much quicker. I love the support I get when questions arise where the knowledge base does not answer. Also, the integration and user interface between Quick Bid and OST is so seamless it reduces all the extra time of calculating prices. Yes, I feel that OST costs are a value in what it provides and the time it saves. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about On-Screen Takeoff®?

The only area that would be helpful would be the ability to create custom keyboard shortcuts. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Vinny Q.
VQ
Vinny Q.
Estimator
Construction
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Feature-Rich and Powerful Tool for Precision Takeoffs"
5/5
What do you like best about On-Screen Takeoff®?

I appreciate how raw and feature-rich OST is. I enjoy that nothing is overly simplified, and there is a genuine learning curve to the app. This means that once you master all its features, you can perform a takeoff more quickly and with greater precision than others. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about On-Screen Takeoff®?

One aspect I dislike is that the program is quite heavy, so it needs a computer that's better than average to run smoothly. I also find the occasional lag frustrating. Additionally, the OST boost feature doesn't work very well unless all the necessary information is contained on a single page, which is rarely the case. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Kelsey Erhart of On-Screen Takeoff®

Thank you for such a thoughtful review, Vinny, and for calling out what you appreciate about OST being “raw” and feature‑rich. We know there’s a real learning curve, and it means a lot to hear that once you’ve mastered those tools, you’re able to complete takeoffs faster and with higher precision, especially when you’re juggling multiple estimates in a day.

You’re also right to point out the tradeoffs. OST is a resource‑intensive application because of the depth of features it provides, so it is optimized for newer Windows environments like Windows 11 and above. Our team is continually working to reduce lag where we can, while still supporting the advanced workflows power users rely on. On Takeoff Boost, your feedback is spot on: it works best today when the key information it needs is contained on a single page, and complex, multi‑page scenarios can limit its effectiveness. We’re actively iterating on Boost and our next takeoff experience to make automated assistance more flexible over time, and input like yours helps us focus on the right improvements. Thanks again for your review, Vinny.

SM
Shivani M.
Architectural Technologist
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Easy and Accurate"
5/5
What do you like best about On-Screen Takeoff®?

It is very easy and convenient to use. I can enter the type of areas and the number I want for a particular product, and it gives me accurate quantities. Multiplying the same items is also simple, and it generates a table that’s easy to relate to, instead of having to create it in a different software. Scaling feels almost magical too—you just need to know the scale and enter the input. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about On-Screen Takeoff®?

Though it generates table, I would like it to be more specific and it should have a background of it's own so that can be differentiated from the drawings. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Construction
UC
Verified User in Construction
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Ease of USE!"
5/5
What do you like best about On-Screen Takeoff®?

The ease of use and being able to dive right in—"On-Screen Takeoff has completely transformed how we do estimates. It's incredibly intuitive and easy to learn, even for new team members. The point-and-click measurements for linear, area, and counts are accurate and fast, and the recent AI-powered Takeoff Boost saves us hours on repetitive tasks. Customer support is excellent, with helpful training resources. We've won more bids with confidence and with far less overtime. Highly recommend for any construction professional doing takeoffs!" Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about On-Screen Takeoff®?

Have not really found anything as of yet Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Kelsey Erhart of On-Screen Takeoff®

Thank you for such a fantastic review and for sharing how OST has changed the way you bid jobs. We love that you were able to just jump right in, and transform your workflow from 12–16 hours down to just a few hours, and keep everyone on the same page with color-coded markups and instant updates. We really appreciate you taking the time to review OST.

Armando R.
AR
Armando R.
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Intuitive AI with Room for Improvement"
4/5
What do you like best about On-Screen Takeoff®?

I like that I can reassign takeoff areas when the AI gets it wrong, which makes it valuable because I can fix the AI mistakes easily. I also found the initial setup to be extremely easy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about On-Screen Takeoff®?

I think adding a feature where you can open up a new tab would be helpful, allowing you to jump from tab to tab easily. This would let you have a floor plan and a cut section open simultaneously, and navigate between them by using the ribbon. It feels like it would improve how I work with different sections of the plans. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

MK
manish k.
Drafting Technologist
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Time saving, Easy to Use, Quick Response, and Flexible Multi-Option Support."
5/5
What do you like best about On-Screen Takeoff®?

I like how easy On-Screen Takeoff is to use, and how it helps me measure plans quickly and accurately. It saves me time, keeps my estimates well organized, and makes the overall takeoff process more efficient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about On-Screen Takeoff®?

At times, it feels a bit slow, and some features take a while to learn. I also wish the interface looked more modern and were easier to navigate overall. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Architecture & Planning
UA
Verified User in Architecture & Planning
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Streamlined Takeoffs That Boost Efficiency"
5/5
What do you like best about On-Screen Takeoff®?

The ability to overlay conditions, track changes, and organize takeoffs with precision saves hours on every project. I also appreciate how easy it is to review quantities, export data, and keep everything consistent across multiple drawings. It reduces errors, boosts confidence, and genuinely streamlines the estimating process. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about On-Screen Takeoff®?

The UI feels old‑school compared to newer estimating platforms. Some menus and workflows aren’t as streamlined as they could be, which slows down navigation when you’re working through dozens of drawings. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

SA
Samuel A.
Associate Project Engineer
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Essential Tool for Streamlined Production Tracking"
4.5/5
What do you like best about On-Screen Takeoff®?

This program has proven to be incredibly useful for tracking production, especially with its feature that allows us to physically mark completions and percentage completion on every item in our takeoff. I use it most days and really appreciate being able to pick up exactly where I left off, even when I don't have an internet connection. Since our company adopted this software, our work has become much easier, as integrating this production tracking system is far more efficient than relying on traditional paper and pen takeoff methods. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about On-Screen Takeoff®?

If it were possible to use this program on an iPad instead of having to carry a laptop while walking around my project sites, it would be a significant improvement in terms of ease of use. This would be especially beneficial if foremen and field personnel could access and utilize it directly themselves. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Kelsey Erhart of On-Screen Takeoff®

Thank you for such a thoughtful review, Samuel, and for sharing how you use OST to track production, mark completion and percent complete, and keep everything organized in a clean digital record. It’s great to hear that you can pick up right where you left off and that moving away from paper-and-pen takeoff has made it easier to estimate.

Your point about using OST on an iPad instead of carrying a laptop around the job site is very well taken, especially for foremen and field teams who would benefit from direct access in the field. Today, OST is a Windows desktop application, but our product team is actively investing in a new takeoff solution that is being designed to be responsive on tablets and iPads, so it’s much easier to use on site. Feedback like yours helps us prioritize those kinds of field-friendly improvements, and we really appreciate you taking the time to share it. Thanks again for your review!

AM
Ayrton M.
Senior Estimator
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Very easy software to use"
4.5/5
What do you like best about On-Screen Takeoff®?

It seems easy to use, I like the set out of the HDR Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about On-Screen Takeoff®?

Sometime it can be very laggy when I have multiple drawings Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Reed P.
RP
Reed P.
Lead Estimator
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Powerful Customization and Seamless Bidding Integration"
5/5
What do you like best about On-Screen Takeoff®?

What is most helpful is the ability to create and customize my takeoff conditions and assign them to groups and sections. Also having OST in conjunction with Quickbid is a very powerful way to create a bid. And once I have bid something, I can track plan changes fairly easily. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about On-Screen Takeoff®?

What I dislike the least is handling a masonry takeoff, which I sometimes have to do. Specifically CMU walls and such items. There is a lot of customizing I have to do and often enough it doens't work the way I want it to. Like rebar takeoffs are very easy or accurate.

Another dislike, which is linked to masonry takeoffs, is the inability to have multiple scale on the same page and/or split horizontal v vertical scales. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Kelsey Erhart of On-Screen Takeoff®

Thank you for sharing how you’re using OST, especially around customizing conditions, grouping them, and pairing OST with Quick Bid to build your bids and track plan changes. That’s exactly the type of workflow those tools are designed for, and it’s great to hear the new split area tool has been helpful when you need to break out existing takeoff.

On the masonry side, your feedback is really valuable. CMU walls and related items can be more complex to model, and it sounds like you’re running into limitations with how your custom setup behaves compared to something more straightforward like rebar. We’d love to better understand your current CMU workflow and what “doesn’t work the way you want it to,” so our team can look at where we can improve. Would you be open to chatting with someone on the product team about this? Please email customeradvocacy@constructconnect.com for more details.

Regarding scale, you’re right to call out the constraint: OST isn’t architected to support multiple scales on the same page or different horizontal vs. vertical scales, so that’s not something the program can handle today. We know that can be a real limitation for certain masonry plans, and feedback like yours helps our product team understand where those constraints are most impactful as we continue refining the product. Thank you again for your review, Reed!

Questions about On-Screen Takeoff®? Ask real users or explore answers from the community

Get practical answers, real workflows, and honest pros and cons from the G2 community or share your insights.

GU
Guest User
•
Last activity 9 months ago

What is OnCenter used for?

0 Upvotes
1
Join the conversation
GU
Guest User

What is your experience with OnCenter for construction project management, and what features do you find most valuable?

0 Upvotes
0
Join the conversation

Pricing Insights

Averages based on real user reviews.

Time to Implement

1 month

Return on Investment

11 months

Perceived Cost

$$$$$
On-Screen Takeoff® Features
Cost Calculators
Enterprise Search
Multiple Input Formats
Collaborative Editing
Automated BoQs and BoMs
Versioning