What has been most helpful with this platform has been the CPQ portal. The CPQ feature has significantly helped me with bulk quote requests. Before C2F, I would have to search manually for the providers available on a site per-site basis. However, C2F has saved me a lot of time since they automatically do the provider search for you. The results are accurate for the most part. C2F has also helped display what DIA providers might be available for an address. Furthermore, if I don't have an existing relationship with a particular provider that partners with C2F, C2F is willing to make that introduction. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The main downside to C2F is that accuracy seems to vary by provider. The main issue we have seen has been with AT&T. What may display as on-net on the CPQ portal may not be on-net on AT&T's APEX portal. Thus, we do find ourselves having to verify CPQ results on our direct vendor portals. Another thing I wish was more accurate on C2F is the DSL speeds that are available per site. C2F's DSL speeds available with Lumen are not always what we see on our Lumen Vendor Control Center portal. For DSL speeds with C2F, I checked on both the pricing tool and CPQ results. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
