Great at finding issues you didn't consider. Runs directly on merge requests so you don't merge without addressing things. Appreciate the Cursor extension so you can check your code before pushing it to the repository. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Only thing that's annoying is that sometimes you fix an issue and then it tells you about another issue (not from the newest changes you just made), and that can happen a few times. Ideally, it would tell you all those issues the first time to reduce back and forth. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like the integration with Github, it is very easy to get feedback and interact with it on the PR itself.

I also like that it all can read Claude/Cursor harness files so we can invest in the harness and get it integrated into the product Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The main item I dislike is that when I get a review from coderabbit, and asks Claude to fix the comments, there is some "disagreements" between the two, while I expect coderabbit to read the claude.md files and align itself with our guidelines to prevent it Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like that CodeRabbit provides automated, AI-powered code reviews directly within pull requests. It helps identify bugs and suggests improvements, which makes the review process feel smoother and more consistent. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don’t like that CodeRabbit can sometimes produce overly cautious or repetitive suggestions, including comments on minor issues that aren’t really significant. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Its good for getting some quick feedback concerning uncommitted changes, logic bugs or missing unit tests in your codebase. It highlights issues per line while providing fixes and as an added bonus it works in real time while you are typing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The in-app editor plugin doesn't provide as much features as the full git based PR tool, and the free trial session cap limits are too short. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best about CodeRabbit is how quickly it reviews my PRs. I get line-by-line comments within minutes, and it catches things like unused code, naming issues, and poor optimizations before a human even looks at it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

My biggest gripe is permissions: adding and removing users can only be done through the UI, and it becomes slow and clunky once you’re managing a larger team. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like CodeRabbit because of the speed at which it executes processes and gives us early feedback about the code. It's really impressive and helpful the way the CodeRabbit AI agent acts like a human in pull request conversations, understanding the context, terminology, and the way we write code in our company. It's straightforward to use, and we didn't have to configure much before starting. The fact that it automates first-level code reviews by identifying things like null checks, basic code issues, and errors makes it valuable for me. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing as of now Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I liked most about CodeRabbit was that it made code reviews feel a lot more approachable. Even though it uses AI, the feedback didn't come across as overly technical or robotic. During the demo, I liked how it explained why something could be improved instead of just pointing out a problem, which makes it feel more helpful, especially if you're still learning.

I also really liked how it works directly with GitHub. Everything stays within the pull request, so you don't have to jump between different tools or copy code around. The AI summaries were also a nice feature because they gave a quick overview of what changed before diving into the details.

Something that surprised me was how natural the suggestions felt. They came across more like another teammate giving helpful feedback instead of just an automated checklist. Overall, it seems like a tool that could make reviews faster while also helping developers write better code over time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Honestly, I didn't come away with any big complaints after the demo. If I had to pick something, I'd say there's a bit of a learning curve at the beginning just because there are so many features and settings. I think having a few more guided walkthroughs or beginner-friendly templates would make it feel less intimidating for someone using it for the first time.

I also wish there were a few more options to personalize the AI feedback. Every team reviews code a little differently, so being able to fine-tune the style or level of detail even more would be really nice.

The GitHub integration looked super smooth, which I loved, but if you're working across different platforms, I could see wanting more flexibility there too. As for pricing, it seems worth it if your team is constantly reviewing pull requests, but for smaller teams or solo developers, it might take a little longer to see the return on the investment.

Overall though, these aren't deal breakers at all. Most of what I'd want are just little quality-of-life improvements because the product itself looked really polished and easy to see yourself using. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best about CodeRabbit is how much it accelerates and improves the Pull Request review process.

Automated summaries: It generates clear explanations and diagrams of what each change does before you even start reviewing line by line. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While CodeRabbit is a great tool overall, the main thing I dislike is the occasional comment noise and nitpicking.

Overly pedantic feedback: Out of the box, it can sometimes feel a bit too aggressive, flagging minor style tweaks or edge cases that don’t really matter for the scope of the PR. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Code Rabbit makes code reviews faster and more efficient by providing clear, context-aware feedback directly within pull requests. The most helpful part is how much time it saves for both developers and reviewers, while keeping the review process focused and easy to follow. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

CodeRabbit sometimes gives unnecessary or repetitive suggestions,so not allowed feedback is useful Developers still need to review its recommendations carefully.

It can also miss project specific context and complex business logic,so human code reviews are still essential Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The feedback is good and has helped identify issues with code before going into testing, giving me more confidence prior to merging. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The fair-usage is awful, and I'm not saying that because the licensing model isn't fair, it's that they give you zero visibility in what you've actually used. The fair usage states "X amount of PR reviews" on your plan, but they don't tell you how many you've used, when your 7 days renews, or anything. It all happens in a black box.

I reached out to support, and they can't even tell me, you're just supposed to trust them (I'm throttled to 1 an hour, which happens when you've done 90+ reviews in the last 7 days). Totally fair.

What's not fair is that equates to 35% of my LIFETIME PRs, which I definitely didn't do in only the last 7 days.

I also understand that a PR might be reviewed more than once. Fine. However, don't tell us to just "believe you" and the number is right, without showing us how it's actually calculated.

This lack of transparency makes us go a different direction when I'd easily spend more on the product if I felt the numbers were right because you've proved they are. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.