2026 Best Software Awards are here!See the list

Check Point CloudGuard WAF Reviews & Product Details

Value at a Glance

Averages based on real user reviews.

Time to Implement

1 month

Check Point CloudGuard WAF Integrations

(4)
Verified by Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Check Point CloudGuard WAF Media

Meet Check Point CloudGuard WAF, powered by Advanced AI. Our web application firewall takes a unique prevention-first approach to web
application security. Learn more: https://www.checkpoint.com/cloudguard... #APISecurity
Play Check Point CloudGuard WAF Video
Meet Check Point CloudGuard WAF, powered by Advanced AI. Our web application firewall takes a unique prevention-first approach to web application security. Learn more: https://www.checkpoint.com/cloudguard... #APISecurity
A quick look at how Check Point is changing the game of cloud security by adding prevention to their CNAPP offering.
Play Check Point CloudGuard WAF Video
A quick look at how Check Point is changing the game of cloud security by adding prevention to their CNAPP offering.
Product Avatar Image

Have you used Check Point CloudGuard WAF before?

Answer a few questions to help the Check Point CloudGuard WAF community

Check Point CloudGuard WAF Reviews (53)

Reviews

Check Point CloudGuard WAF Reviews (53)

4.4
53 reviews

Review Summary

Generated using AI from real user reviews
Users consistently praise the product for its strong protection against web threats and ease of setup, allowing for quick deployment in cloud environments. The automated threat detection and minimal maintenance requirements are particularly valued, making it suitable for teams with limited resources. However, some users note that the initial configuration can be complex, which may pose challenges for new users.

Pros & Cons

Generated from real user reviews
View All Pros and Cons
Search reviews
Filter Reviews
Clear Results
G2 reviews are authentic and verified.
Prasanth K.
PK
Enterprise Architect | Cloud Transformation Leader | Driving Multi-Cloud Strategy, Solutions | DevSecOps Excellence | Innovation Resilient Infrastructure at Scale
Information Technology and Services
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Great Protection Without the Need to Be a Pro"
What do you like best about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

CloudGuard WAF is an excellent non-cloud choice to keep the applications or website secured without being a security expert. It hides the background or ground level details of application and acts as a barrier layer in front of your site and automatically blocks unauthorized and DDos and others attacks. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

Just liek any other software out there Cloudguard does have some complex and rigid configuration policies which i really feel aren't worthy.

Sometimes configuration takes more time than actual benefits. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Eric S.
ES
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Solid Protection with Machine Learning; Console Improvable"
What do you like best about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

I greatly appreciate the machine learning engine of Check Point CloudGuard WAF for prevention, because it automates much of the complex work of rule management, drastically reducing false positives. I don't have to write custom rules from scratch and the policies adapt well to real traffic after the initial learning period. Additionally, I like the security policy updates that come from the cloud without me having to intervene manually. The preemptive bot protection is very effective, clearly distinguishing between good and malicious bots, and the automatic API discovery is convenient for mapping APIs and detecting unprotected endpoints. The unified console for policy management across different environments, cloud and on-prem, is very useful to avoid maintaining separate stacks. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

The management console could be improved; sometimes you have to click too many times to find specific information, and the logging system is not granular enough during troubleshooting. The documentation lacks concrete examples for real use cases, and more practical troubleshooting support would be helpful. Integration with Splunk requires writing custom parsing, and support for configuration as code has room for improvement. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Rabindra K.
RK
Cloud Engineer
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Effortless Hybrid App Security and Rock-Solid API Protection"
What do you like best about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

What really stands out to me is how easy it is to manage across our hybrid environment it doesn’t care if our apps are in AWS, Azure, or on-prem, everything just works. The SSL offloading took a massive load off our backend servers, and the API protection has been rock solid. Honestly, I don’t have to think about WAF configs anymore, and that’s the dream. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

The reporting and logging could definitely be more intuitive I usually end up exporting logs just to make sense of them because the built-in tools feel clunky. Also, the dashboard sometimes takes a few extra seconds to load, which is more annoying than it should be for a product at this price point. Minor frustrations, but they add up. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Maqsud A.
MA
Network Security Engineer
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"AI-Driven WAF with Minimal Manual Tuning"
What do you like best about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

I like Check Point CloudGuard WAF because of its contextual AI that delivers near-zero false positives and automatic zero-day protection. I find it extremely valuable for providing strong automatic protection against zero-day threats with almost no false positives and requiring zero daily tuning effort. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

One area that could be improved is the initial learning period for very complex or highly dynamic applications, which sometimes requires a bit more manual exception tuning than I'd prefer in the first few weeks. Also, the initial setup/learning phase for complex apps can be a bit involved, and pricing feels premium, though the low-maintenance protection usually justifies it for serious environments. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Eric S.
ES
Machine Learning Engineer
"Easy to Distribute, Great for the Cloud"
What do you like best about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

I really like the simplicity of deploying Check Point CloudGuard WAF. It is cloud native and integrates well with AWS and Azure, automatically scaling when there is a traffic spike. I appreciate the centralized management that saves me time and the console where I can manage multiple environments from a single interface. The AI engine for threat detection is impressive and reduces the tuning work, learning from legitimate traffic and alerting you to attacks that might go unnoticed with other solutions. Check Point's support has always been quite responsive. Additionally, the updates for signatures and protection rules are automatic, which saves me valuable time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

The thing that annoys me the most is the price. It is not cheap at all, and when I have to propose it to smaller clients, I often struggle to justify the cost compared to cheaper alternatives. The documentation could also be much better. Sometimes you look for how to do a specific thing and end up going around in circles among guides that don't answer your question or are outdated. Another thing that bothers me is that the console is sometimes slow, especially when you have to scroll through heavy logs or generate reports over long periods. The initial tuning of the machine learning requires patience. The first few weeks it generates some false positives until it learns the traffic well, and you have to keep an eye on it to avoid blocking legitimate users. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Md Akil A.
MA
Associate Consultant
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Effective Security with Easy-to-Use Interface"
What do you like best about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

I like the Check Point CloudGuard WAF's GUI, which is very easy to use. It effectively helps in providing security to applications by allowing and blocking IPs, which is especially useful as we work on zero internet in our project. If we know an IP is part of our internal or external client, we can easily allow that IP. Check Point CloudGuard WAF's security is a key reason why we switched from using Azure Firewall. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

I think internal DNS needs to be removed. Also, the initial setup isn't easy, and when we try to resolve any ip it getting resolved but not from given source Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

AT
Developer
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Powerful, Automated Protection for Modern Cloud Applications"
What do you like best about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

It's designed to protect our websites , Api and cloud applications from cyber attacks. This protects our application from being hacked. random heavy traffic does not cause the website to go down. reduces false positives saving time for developers and testing. fully automated setup requires very little manual tuning. very powerful for modern cloud native applications. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

It's many users say that its policies and rules are not easy to configure correctly. it's very expensive. technical engineers are not always available and troubleshooting takes time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

AK
Solution Consultant
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Checkpoint CloudGuard WAF"
What do you like best about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

What I like most about Checkpoint cloud guard WAF is it combine, AI-Driven protection with simplicity of deployment and low operational burden. The solution is cloud native, scalable, globally distributed and designed for rapid deployment so organization can protect their web assets quickly. Checkpoint Cloud Guard WAF uses contextual AI to defend web apps and APIs from known and zero-day threats, with minimal false positive and no manual tunning. Customer support is very active. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

There is no dislike as of now. Product is doing great. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

oscarina s.
OS
Manager
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Proactive Threat Prevention with Easy Setup"
What do you like best about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

I appreciate the proactive and AI-driven threat prevention offered by Check Point CloudGuard WAF. It effectively detects and blocks threats like SQL injections, remote code execution, and automated bots without the need for traditional signature updates. This advanced AI-driven security extends protection against a wide range of threats, including zero-day exploits and API attacks, all with minimal effort. I find the product’s capability to ensure comprehensive threat coverage with reduced manual intervention to be highly valuable. Additionally, the initial setup process is very easy, which facilitates a smooth adoption and fast deployment. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

The steep learning curve is largely due to the sheer number of features and the extensive configuration needed before the system feels truly comfortable to use. With so many profiles, protections, exception paths, and tuning options available, it can be difficult to determine exactly what is necessary from the very beginning. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Jean Carlos B.
JB
JEFE
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Quick and Effective Protection, but with Configuration Challenges"
What do you like best about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

I love that Check Point CloudGuard WAF protects our web applications and cloud APIs against a wide range of threats, which is crucial in today's digital environment. I especially value its ability to prevent bot attacks, ensuring the secure operation of our applications, in addition to effectively protecting us against scammers. I find that the implementation is quick and simplified, which is a great benefit by minimizing the time and effort needed to get the system up and running. I am also impressed with its multi-platform security that provides solid protection, and the high protection rate it offers highlights its effectiveness. Additionally, the initial configuration of Check Point CloudGuard WAF is very simple and suitable for users of different experience levels, which greatly facilitates the integration process. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

Possible bottleneck in the performance of the computer's processor and poor management of configurations. It overloads the computer's CPU a lot despite the hardware's power. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

No Discussions for This Product Yet

Be the first to ask a question and get answers from real users and experts.

Start a discussion

Pricing Insights

Averages based on real user reviews.

Time to Implement

1 month

Return on Investment

15 months

Average Discount

11%

Check Point CloudGuard WAF Features
Logging and Reporting
Issue Tracking
Security Monitoring
Application-Layer Controls
Traffic Controls
Network Controls
API / Integrations
Bot Traffic
API Discovery
API Monitoring
Reporting
Product Avatar Image
Check Point CloudGuard WAF