# Top 10 Ethiack Alternatives & Competitors
**Average Rating:** 4.4/5
**Total Number of Reviews:** 15
Research alternative solutions to Ethiack on G2, with real user reviews on competing tools. Other important factors to consider when researching alternatives to Ethiack include features and security. The best overall Ethiack alternative is Scrut Automation. Other similar apps like Ethiack are Wiz, CloudBees, Tenable Nessus, and Arctic Wolf. Ethiack alternatives can be found in [Risk-Based Vulnerability Management Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/risk-based-vulnerability-management) but may also be in [Threat Intelligence Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/threat-intelligence) or [Security Compliance Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/security-compliance).


## Best Paid & Free Alternatives to Ethiack
  - [Scrut Automation](https://www.g2.com/products/scrut-automation/reviews)
  - [Wiz](https://www.g2.com/products/wiz-wiz/reviews)
  - [CloudBees](https://www.g2.com/products/cloudbees/reviews)
  - [Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/products/tenable-nessus/reviews)
  - [Arctic Wolf](https://www.g2.com/products/arctic-wolf/reviews)
  - [Recorded Future](https://www.g2.com/products/recorded-future/reviews)
  - [Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)](https://www.g2.com/products/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm/reviews)
  - [Intruder](https://www.g2.com/products/intruder/reviews)
  - [Pentera](https://www.g2.com/products/pentera/reviews)
  - [Check Point Exposure Management](https://www.g2.com/products/check-point-exposure-management/reviews)

## Top 10 Alternatives to Ethiack Recently Reviewed By G2 Community
Browse options below. Based on reviewer data, you can see how Ethiack stacks up to the competition, check reviews from current & previous users in industries like Computer & Network Security, Insurance, and Airlines/Aviation, and find the best product for your business.


  ### 1. [Scrut Automation](https://www.g2.com/products/scrut-automation/reviews)
By Scrut Automation
**Average Rating:** 4.9/5
**Total Reviews:** 1,313
Automatically test your cloud configurations against 150+ CIS benchmarks across multiple cloud accounts on AWS, Azure, GCP and more, to maintain a strong infosec posture.


Reviewers say compared to Ethiack, Scrut Automation is:
- Slower to reach roi
- More usable
- Easier to set up
Categories in common with Ethiack: [Attack Surface Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/attack-surface-management)

**Compare:** [Ethiack vs Scrut Automation](https://www.g2.com/compare/ethiack-vs-scrut-automation)
**Compare Scrut Automation with other alternatives:**
- [Scrut Automation vs Wiz](https://www.g2.com/compare/scrut-automation-vs-wiz-wiz)
- [Scrut Automation vs CloudBees](https://www.g2.com/compare/cloudbees-vs-scrut-automation)
- [Scrut Automation vs Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/compare/scrut-automation-vs-tenable-nessus)
- [Scrut Automation vs Arctic Wolf](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-scrut-automation)
- [Scrut Automation vs Recorded Future](https://www.g2.com/compare/recorded-future-vs-scrut-automation)
- [Scrut Automation vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)](https://www.g2.com/compare/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm-vs-scrut-automation)
- [Scrut Automation vs Intruder](https://www.g2.com/compare/intruder-vs-scrut-automation)
- [Scrut Automation vs Pentera](https://www.g2.com/compare/pentera-vs-scrut-automation)
- [Scrut Automation vs Check Point Exposure Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/check-point-exposure-management-vs-scrut-automation)

  ### 2. [Wiz](https://www.g2.com/products/wiz-wiz/reviews)
By Wiz
**Average Rating:** 4.7/5
**Total Reviews:** 840
Wiz is a CNAPP that consolidates CSPM, KSPM, CWPP, vulnerability management, IaC scanning, CIEM, DSPM, and container and Kubernetes security into a single platform.


Reviewers say compared to Ethiack, Wiz is:
- Slower to reach roi
- More expensive
- Easier to set up
Categories in common with Ethiack: [Attack Surface Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/attack-surface-management)

**Compare:** [Ethiack vs Wiz](https://www.g2.com/compare/ethiack-vs-wiz-wiz)
**Compare Wiz with other alternatives:**
- [Wiz vs Scrut Automation](https://www.g2.com/compare/scrut-automation-vs-wiz-wiz)
- [Wiz vs CloudBees](https://www.g2.com/compare/cloudbees-vs-wiz-wiz)
- [Wiz vs Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/compare/tenable-nessus-vs-wiz-wiz)
- [Wiz vs Arctic Wolf](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-wiz-wiz)
- [Wiz vs Recorded Future](https://www.g2.com/compare/recorded-future-vs-wiz-wiz)
- [Wiz vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)](https://www.g2.com/compare/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm-vs-wiz-wiz)
- [Wiz vs Intruder](https://www.g2.com/compare/intruder-vs-wiz-wiz)
- [Wiz vs Pentera](https://www.g2.com/compare/pentera-vs-wiz-wiz)
- [Wiz vs Check Point Exposure Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/check-point-exposure-management-vs-wiz-wiz)

  ### 3. [CloudBees](https://www.g2.com/products/cloudbees/reviews)
By CloudBees
**Average Rating:** 4.4/5
**Total Reviews:** 621
Enabling the world’s biggest and brightest companies to transition from incoherent, disconnected DevOps to self-service, fast, secure workflows connecting software delivery to business outcomes.


Reviewers say compared to Ethiack, CloudBees is:
- Slower to reach roi
- More usable
- Better at meeting requirements
Categories in common with Ethiack: [Risk-Based Vulnerability Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/risk-based-vulnerability-management)

**Compare:** [Ethiack vs CloudBees](https://www.g2.com/compare/cloudbees-vs-ethiack)
**Compare CloudBees with other alternatives:**
- [CloudBees vs Scrut Automation](https://www.g2.com/compare/cloudbees-vs-scrut-automation)
- [CloudBees vs Wiz](https://www.g2.com/compare/cloudbees-vs-wiz-wiz)
- [CloudBees vs Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/compare/cloudbees-vs-tenable-nessus)
- [CloudBees vs Arctic Wolf](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-cloudbees)
- [CloudBees vs Recorded Future](https://www.g2.com/compare/cloudbees-vs-recorded-future)
- [CloudBees vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)](https://www.g2.com/compare/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm-vs-cloudbees)
- [CloudBees vs Intruder](https://www.g2.com/compare/cloudbees-vs-intruder)
- [CloudBees vs Pentera](https://www.g2.com/compare/cloudbees-vs-pentera)
- [CloudBees vs Check Point Exposure Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/check-point-exposure-management-vs-cloudbees)

  ### 4. [Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/products/tenable-nessus/reviews)
By Tenable
**Average Rating:** 4.5/5
**Total Reviews:** 304
From the beginning, we've worked hand-in-hand with the security community. We continuously optimize Nessus based on community feedback to make it the most accurate and comprehensive vulnerability assessment solution in the market. 20 years later and we're still laser focused on community collaboration and product innovation to provide the most accurate and complete vulnerability data - so you don't miss critical issues which could put your organization at risk. Tenable is a 2021 Gartner Representative Vendor in Vulnerability Assessment.


Reviewers say compared to Ethiack, Tenable Nessus is:
- Slower to reach roi
- More usable
- Better at meeting requirements
Categories in common with Ethiack: [Attack Surface Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/attack-surface-management)

**Compare:** [Ethiack vs Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/compare/ethiack-vs-tenable-nessus)
**Compare Tenable Nessus with other alternatives:**
- [Tenable Nessus vs Scrut Automation](https://www.g2.com/compare/scrut-automation-vs-tenable-nessus)
- [Tenable Nessus vs Wiz](https://www.g2.com/compare/tenable-nessus-vs-wiz-wiz)
- [Tenable Nessus vs CloudBees](https://www.g2.com/compare/cloudbees-vs-tenable-nessus)
- [Tenable Nessus vs Arctic Wolf](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-tenable-nessus)
- [Tenable Nessus vs Recorded Future](https://www.g2.com/compare/recorded-future-vs-tenable-nessus)
- [Tenable Nessus vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)](https://www.g2.com/compare/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm-vs-tenable-nessus)
- [Tenable Nessus vs Intruder](https://www.g2.com/compare/intruder-vs-tenable-nessus)
- [Tenable Nessus vs Pentera](https://www.g2.com/compare/pentera-vs-tenable-nessus)
- [Tenable Nessus vs Check Point Exposure Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/check-point-exposure-management-vs-tenable-nessus)

  ### 5. [Arctic Wolf](https://www.g2.com/products/arctic-wolf/reviews)
By Arctic Wolf Networks
**Average Rating:** 4.7/5
**Total Reviews:** 280
Arctic Wolf provides Cyber-SOC as a service, designed to make every link in the security chain stronger.


Reviewers say compared to Ethiack, Arctic Wolf is:
- Slower to reach roi
- More usable
- More expensive
Categories in common with Ethiack: [Risk-Based Vulnerability Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/risk-based-vulnerability-management)

**Compare:** [Ethiack vs Arctic Wolf](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-ethiack)
**Compare Arctic Wolf with other alternatives:**
- [Arctic Wolf vs Scrut Automation](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-scrut-automation)
- [Arctic Wolf vs Wiz](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-wiz-wiz)
- [Arctic Wolf vs CloudBees](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-cloudbees)
- [Arctic Wolf vs Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-tenable-nessus)
- [Arctic Wolf vs Recorded Future](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-recorded-future)
- [Arctic Wolf vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm)
- [Arctic Wolf vs Intruder](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-intruder)
- [Arctic Wolf vs Pentera](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-pentera)
- [Arctic Wolf vs Check Point Exposure Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-check-point-exposure-management)

  ### 6. [Recorded Future](https://www.g2.com/products/recorded-future/reviews)
By Recorded Future
**Average Rating:** 4.6/5
**Total Reviews:** 230
Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud elevates your existing security defenses by enhancing the depth and breadth of protection by giving you insights into threats and attacks before they impact, so you can stay ahead of attackers, at the speed and scale of today’s threat environment.


Reviewers say compared to Ethiack, Recorded Future is:
- Slower to reach roi
- More expensive
- More usable
Categories in common with Ethiack: [Risk-Based Vulnerability Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/risk-based-vulnerability-management), [Attack Surface Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/attack-surface-management)

**Compare:** [Ethiack vs Recorded Future](https://www.g2.com/compare/ethiack-vs-recorded-future)
**Compare Recorded Future with other alternatives:**
- [Recorded Future vs Scrut Automation](https://www.g2.com/compare/recorded-future-vs-scrut-automation)
- [Recorded Future vs Wiz](https://www.g2.com/compare/recorded-future-vs-wiz-wiz)
- [Recorded Future vs CloudBees](https://www.g2.com/compare/cloudbees-vs-recorded-future)
- [Recorded Future vs Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/compare/recorded-future-vs-tenable-nessus)
- [Recorded Future vs Arctic Wolf](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-recorded-future)
- [Recorded Future vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)](https://www.g2.com/compare/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm-vs-recorded-future)
- [Recorded Future vs Intruder](https://www.g2.com/compare/intruder-vs-recorded-future)
- [Recorded Future vs Pentera](https://www.g2.com/compare/pentera-vs-recorded-future)
- [Recorded Future vs Check Point Exposure Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/check-point-exposure-management-vs-recorded-future)

  ### 7. [Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)](https://www.g2.com/products/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm/reviews)
By Cisco
**Average Rating:** 4.3/5
**Total Reviews:** 217
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM), the original SaaS risk-based vulnerability management platform, prioritizes vulnerabilities that pose a real risk, enabling Security and IT teams to focus their limited resources and remediate more efficiently. Cisco’s data science-driven prioritization evaluates both enterprise data and a wealth of data on real-world exploit activity and translates that context into actionable intelligence to guide remediation.


Reviewers say compared to Ethiack, Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) is:
- Slower to reach roi
- More usable
- Better at meeting requirements
Categories in common with Ethiack: [Risk-Based Vulnerability Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/risk-based-vulnerability-management)

**Compare:** [Ethiack vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)](https://www.g2.com/compare/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm-vs-ethiack)
**Compare Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) with other alternatives:**
- [Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs Scrut Automation](https://www.g2.com/compare/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm-vs-scrut-automation)
- [Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs Wiz](https://www.g2.com/compare/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm-vs-wiz-wiz)
- [Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs CloudBees](https://www.g2.com/compare/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm-vs-cloudbees)
- [Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/compare/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm-vs-tenable-nessus)
- [Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs Arctic Wolf](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm)
- [Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs Recorded Future](https://www.g2.com/compare/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm-vs-recorded-future)
- [Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs Intruder](https://www.g2.com/compare/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm-vs-intruder)
- [Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs Pentera](https://www.g2.com/compare/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm-vs-pentera)
- [Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs Check Point Exposure Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/check-point-exposure-management-vs-cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm)

  ### 8. [Intruder](https://www.g2.com/products/intruder/reviews)
By Intruder
**Average Rating:** 4.8/5
**Total Reviews:** 209
Intruder is a proactive security monitoring platform for internet-facing systems.


Reviewers say compared to Ethiack, Intruder is:
- Slower to reach roi
- More usable
- Easier to set up
Categories in common with Ethiack: [Attack Surface Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/attack-surface-management)

**Compare:** [Ethiack vs Intruder](https://www.g2.com/compare/ethiack-vs-intruder)
**Compare Intruder with other alternatives:**
- [Intruder vs Scrut Automation](https://www.g2.com/compare/intruder-vs-scrut-automation)
- [Intruder vs Wiz](https://www.g2.com/compare/intruder-vs-wiz-wiz)
- [Intruder vs CloudBees](https://www.g2.com/compare/cloudbees-vs-intruder)
- [Intruder vs Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/compare/intruder-vs-tenable-nessus)
- [Intruder vs Arctic Wolf](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-intruder)
- [Intruder vs Recorded Future](https://www.g2.com/compare/intruder-vs-recorded-future)
- [Intruder vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)](https://www.g2.com/compare/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm-vs-intruder)
- [Intruder vs Pentera](https://www.g2.com/compare/intruder-vs-pentera)
- [Intruder vs Check Point Exposure Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/check-point-exposure-management-vs-intruder)

  ### 9. [Pentera](https://www.g2.com/products/pentera/reviews)
By Pentera
**Average Rating:** 4.5/5
**Total Reviews:** 174
Pentera is the category leader for Automated Security Validation, allowing every organization to test with ease the integrity of all cybersecurity layers, unfolding true, current security exposures at any moment, at any scale. Thousands of security professionals and service providers around the world use Pentera to guide remediation and close security gaps before they are exploited. For more info visit: pentera.io.


Reviewers say compared to Ethiack, Pentera is:
- Slower to reach roi
- More usable
- Better at support
Categories in common with Ethiack: [Risk-Based Vulnerability Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/risk-based-vulnerability-management), [Attack Surface Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/attack-surface-management)

**Compare:** [Ethiack vs Pentera](https://www.g2.com/compare/ethiack-vs-pentera)
**Compare Pentera with other alternatives:**
- [Pentera vs Scrut Automation](https://www.g2.com/compare/pentera-vs-scrut-automation)
- [Pentera vs Wiz](https://www.g2.com/compare/pentera-vs-wiz-wiz)
- [Pentera vs CloudBees](https://www.g2.com/compare/cloudbees-vs-pentera)
- [Pentera vs Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/compare/pentera-vs-tenable-nessus)
- [Pentera vs Arctic Wolf](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-pentera)
- [Pentera vs Recorded Future](https://www.g2.com/compare/pentera-vs-recorded-future)
- [Pentera vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)](https://www.g2.com/compare/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm-vs-pentera)
- [Pentera vs Intruder](https://www.g2.com/compare/intruder-vs-pentera)
- [Pentera vs Check Point Exposure Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/check-point-exposure-management-vs-pentera)

  ### 10. [Check Point Exposure Management](https://www.g2.com/products/check-point-exposure-management/reviews)
By Check Point Software Technologies
**Average Rating:** 4.6/5
**Total Reviews:** 171
Cyberint is now a Check Point Company. Its impactful intelligence solution combines cyber threat intelligence, external attack surface management, brand protection, and digital supply chain intelligence into a single, powerful solution. By leveraging autonomous discovery of all of an organization’s external-facing assets, coupled with open, deep & dark web intelligence, the solution enables cybersecurity teams to accelerate the detection and disruption of their most pressing cyber risks. Global customers, including Fortune 500 leaders across all major market verticals, rely on us to prevent, detect, investigate, and remediate phishing, malware, fraud, brand abuse, data leaks, external vulnerabilities, and more, ensuring continuous external protection from cyber threats.


Reviewers say compared to Ethiack, Check Point Exposure Management is:
- Slower to reach roi
- More expensive
- More usable
Categories in common with Ethiack: [Risk-Based Vulnerability Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/risk-based-vulnerability-management), [Attack Surface Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/attack-surface-management)

**Compare:** [Ethiack vs Check Point Exposure Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/check-point-exposure-management-vs-ethiack)
**Compare Check Point Exposure Management with other alternatives:**
- [Check Point Exposure Management vs Scrut Automation](https://www.g2.com/compare/check-point-exposure-management-vs-scrut-automation)
- [Check Point Exposure Management vs Wiz](https://www.g2.com/compare/check-point-exposure-management-vs-wiz-wiz)
- [Check Point Exposure Management vs CloudBees](https://www.g2.com/compare/check-point-exposure-management-vs-cloudbees)
- [Check Point Exposure Management vs Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/compare/check-point-exposure-management-vs-tenable-nessus)
- [Check Point Exposure Management vs Arctic Wolf](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-check-point-exposure-management)
- [Check Point Exposure Management vs Recorded Future](https://www.g2.com/compare/check-point-exposure-management-vs-recorded-future)
- [Check Point Exposure Management vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)](https://www.g2.com/compare/check-point-exposure-management-vs-cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm)
- [Check Point Exposure Management vs Intruder](https://www.g2.com/compare/check-point-exposure-management-vs-intruder)
- [Check Point Exposure Management vs Pentera](https://www.g2.com/compare/check-point-exposure-management-vs-pentera)


---
## Ethiack Alternatives FAQs

### How does Ethiack compare to Scrut Automation?

According to G2 data, [Ethiack](https://www.g2.com/products/ethiack/reviews) holds an average rating of 4.5/5 from 9 reviews, while [Scrut Automation](https://www.g2.com/products/scrut-automation/reviews) boasts a higher average rating of 4.9/5 from 1,311 reviews, indicating stronger overall user satisfaction for Scrut Automation. Dimension scores further highlight Scrut Automation's advantage: it leads Ethiack by 0.9 points in Better at Meeting Requirements (9.6 vs 8.7), 1.5 points in More Usable (9.5 vs 8.0), 1.2 points in Easier to Set Up (9.5 vs 8.3), 0.6 points in Easier to Admin (9.6 vs 9.0), 0.8 points in Better at Support (9.7 vs 8.9), though Ethiack scores 0.3 points higher in Easier to Do Business With (10.0 vs 9.7). User reviews of Ethiack emphasize strengths in customer support (4 mentions), innovation (3 mentions), cybersecurity, and automation, but also note cons such as high cost, limited features, and usability issues. Scrut Automation's extensive user feedback highlights ease of use (276 mentions), customer support (249 mentions), compliance management (225 mentions), automation (154 mentions), and integrations (103 mentions) as key pros, with cons including areas for improvement (69 mentions), technical issues (52 mentions), and learning curve challenges (41 mentions). Overall, Scrut Automation is favored for its comprehensive compliance automation, integration capabilities, and user-friendly interface, while Ethiack is recognized for its penetration testing and security innovation but with fewer reviews and some usability limitations.



### What are the best alternatives to Ethiack?

The best alternatives to Ethiack include [Scrut Automation](https://www.g2.com/products/scrut-automation/reviews) (4.9/5 with 1311 reviews), [Wiz](https://www.g2.com/products/wiz-wiz/reviews) (4.7/5 with 795 reviews), [CloudBees](https://www.g2.com/products/cloudbees/reviews) (4.4/5 with 621 reviews), and [Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/products/tenable-nessus/reviews) (4.5/5 with 302 reviews). These alternatives are highly rated and widely adopted, offering robust features and strong customer support.



### What features do alternatives offer that Ethiack does not?

Ethiack lacks scheduling scans for specific dates/times and has limited support for iOS asset scrutiny. Its web portal requires usability improvements and it misses features that enhance security for API-based applications. Additionally, Ethiack has limited automation capabilities compared to alternatives.



### Which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management tools do reviewers recommend instead of Ethiack?

Reviewers recommend [Scrut Automation](https://www.g2.com/products/scrut-automation/reviews) for its superior ease of use, extensive automation of compliance workflows, and excellent customer support, with 276 mentions of ease of use and 249 mentions of support. [Wiz](https://www.g2.com/products/wiz-wiz/reviews) is favored for its agentless deployment, comprehensive cloud-native application protection platform, and advanced risk prioritization, supported by 110 mentions of features and 107 mentions of security. [CloudBees](https://www.g2.com/products/cloudbees/reviews) is recommended for enterprise-grade CI/CD automation, scalability, and integration capabilities, with 5 mentions each of features and reliability. [Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/products/tenable-nessus/reviews) is praised for its accuracy, vulnerability coverage, and ease of use, with 20 mentions of vulnerability identification and 18 mentions of vulnerability detection. These tools offer broader automation, better usability, and more comprehensive feature sets than Ethiack, making them preferred choices for risk-based vulnerability management.



### Why do users choose Scrut Automation over Ethiack?

Users choose [Scrut Automation](https://www.g2.com/products/scrut-automation/reviews) over Ethiack primarily due to its superior ease of use and comprehensive compliance management capabilities. Scrut Automation's platform simplifies complex compliance workflows with extensive automation, reducing manual effort by up to 80%, and offers seamless integrations with cloud providers like AWS, Google Workspace, and identity management systems, which streamline evidence collection and continuous monitoring. The product's intuitive dashboard and real-time visibility into compliance status enable faster audit readiness and risk management. Additionally, Scrut Automation's customer support is highly praised, with 249 mentions highlighting responsiveness and helpfulness, contributing to smoother onboarding and ongoing assistance. Its support for over 50 compliance frameworks, including SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR, makes it versatile for various industries. Users also appreciate the bundled services such as external audits and penetration testing at no extra cost, offering significant cost savings compared to competitors. These factors, combined with a 4.9-star rating from over 1,300 reviews and higher dimension scores in usability (+1.5), setup (+1.2), and support (+0.8), make Scrut Automation the preferred choice for organizations seeking efficient, integrated, and well-supported compliance solutions.




## Explore Articles
- [Which theater venue management platforms have the strongest operational case studies from major performing arts organizations?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/which-theater-venue-management-platforms-have-the-strongest-operational-case-studies-from-major-performing-arts-organizations)
- [Which performance management software do big tech firms use](https://www.g2.com/discussions/which-performance-management-software-do-big-tech-firms-use-and-why)
- [E-signature solutions](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-e-signature-solutions-have-saved-you-time-and-money)
- [Which community association management software combines communication tools with automated billing and collections?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/which-community-association-management-software-combines-communication-tools-with-automated-billing-and-collections)
- [Best rated multi-country payroll provider](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-s-the-best-rated-multi-country-payroll-provider)
- [Zapier vs Make (Integromat) for a non-technical team that wants to build workflow automation bots without involving IT or writing custom code?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/zapier-vs-make-integromat-for-a-non-technical-team-that-wants-to-build-workflow-automation-bots-without-involving-it-or-writing-custom-code)

## Spotlight Categories
- [Sales Compensation Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/sales-compensation)
- [Zero Trust Networking Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/zero-trust-networking)
- [Digital Experience Platforms (DXP)](https://www.g2.com/categories/digital-experience-platforms-dxp)