Ease of use and ease of retrieving vulnerabilities. Easy to build complex searches using built-in commands. Agent-less inventory scanning and most vulnerabilities have a link to fix Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing really has put me off until now. Works as advertised. Maybe automated reporting and a way to apply fixes may have been added as an add-on for remediation purposes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

1. Risk score mechanism

2. Dashboard

3. Option for Top 10 fixes

4.Various categorization such as Top Priority , Active NetBreaches, Easily Exploitable, Malware Exploitable , PopularTargets etc. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

1. Queries are a bit cumbersome, and needs to be simpler.

2. Need a bit more transparencey in the Risk scoring to understand why a specific score is defined.

3. Scores take longer time to refresh (For eg. if a specific change is made, the report page may show immediate change in score, but once you come out of teh report the main dashboard will take much longer) Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like how it exactly tells which machine has which vulnerability Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The extraction of report can be a bit better Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Reports are fastly generated and completely on point. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The time taken to extract the reports sometimes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Kenna allows you to aggregate data from multiple sources to improve security risk management. I also like the SLAs associated with the infrastructure or group of assets to enhance the organization's remediation policy Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don't particularly appreciate that Kenna's whole point and data sources entirely depend on the vulnerability scanners and tools connected, making it more of a data aggregator than a vulnerability management tool. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I felt was helpful was the ability to see in more detail the vulnerabilities on my tenant ranging from end user machines to server level systems. Compared to competitors I feel CVM provided better focused results and easy to follow mitigations of found results. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Reporting needs some more focus and tightened up seems a bit noisy the way its presented now and how to generate the reports you are looking for. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Kenna Security gives me all the vulnerability details and possible remediations on one screen, dashboard customization is also very helpful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I would only love to be able to export the vulnerabilities list per asset to an external file like .pdf in order to contact assets owners. (There maybe is a feature like that but I didn't find it yet?) Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We use Kenna application in our company. It is very practical to see all security vulnerabilities in one screen. Also, the size of the vulnerability and the availability of solution options make our job easier. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Search and Filter screens are very complex Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Is so easy to check vulnerabilities to hostnames, IPs, domains, etc. I used it at any time. To addapt us to the integration was so easy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Anything, is really easy and quick to use. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One of the standout features of Kenna Security is its risk-based approach. By assigning risk scores to vulnerabilities based on factors such as the asset's importance, exploitability, and potential impact, Kenna Security enables security teams to address the most critical issues first. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Pricing, limited customization, integration challenges and complexity Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.