I really appreciate how easy it is to set up multiple meeting types and integrate them directly with my existing tools and calendars. The open-source nature is a huge plus, offering flexibility and control that proprietary solutions lack. It makes scheduling across time zones seamless. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While the core functionality is excellent, the user interface can occasionally feel a little cluttered or counter-intuitive on the administrative side. Also, the mobile experience sometimes feels less polished than the desktop version, requiring minor improvements for on-the-go management. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Modern, intuitive interface. The routing feature is such a game-changer. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The setup can be a bit overwhelming at first, especially with all the options and integrations. Some features feel slightly “developer-first,” so it can take time to find where to change certain settings or texts. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like Cal.com for the balance between its flexibility and simplicity. It provides strong control over scheduling rules and workflows but remains user-friendly for clients and teammates. The open-source approach, reliable calendar syncing, and automatic time-zone handling make it particularly effective for distributed teams. Its smooth integration with existing tools allows us to maintain our workflow efficiently. I really appreciate the team-based scheduling support, with features like shared availability, round-robin booking, and role-based access that streamline managing meetings across team members. Moreover, its reliability in calendar syncing and notifications ensures meetings run smoothly, saving us time and reducing confusion. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While Cal.com works well overall, some aspects could be improved. A few advanced features and settings aren’t immediately intuitive, which can make the learning curve slightly steep for new users. Clearer in-app guidance, better onboarding flows, and more concise documentation would help teams unlock its full potential faster. Small UI refinements in certain areas could also improve overall usability. One area where Cal.com could enhance usability is in-app guidance. Step-by-step walkthroughs or tooltips during initial setup—especially for team scheduling, permissions, and advanced booking rules—would make onboarding smoother for new users. A centralized setup checklist could also help teams ensure nothing important is missed. From a UI perspective, clearer labeling for advanced settings and more consistent visual hierarchy would reduce confusion when configuring complex workflows. Improving search or filtering within settings, along with better contextual help links, would make navigation faster and more intuitive. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I feel that the user interface, the customizability, and ease of integration are better than Calendly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are some features that are behind a paywall that seem like they would be standard issue. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I love using Cal.com for my scheduling because it avoids any kind of back and forth between people I need to meet, and it just makes things so easy. With Cal.com, I save a bunch of time since I don't need to ask people for their time availabilities. My team can see all of my availability and when I'm not available through my Cal.com scheduler. It's super easy to set up and took no time. I love how beautiful it looks, making everything appear really sleek. This aesthetic aspect helps because it makes the person more likely to actually go and pick a time, especially clients for my business. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

/ Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I love Cal.com's high level of customization. It allows me to control almost every part of the booking experience, including meeting types, availability logic, integrations, reminders, and branding. I use it along with several other tools to streamline my workflow. It connects smoothly with Google Calendar to sync my availability in real time, and I also use Zoom for automatically generating meeting links. The integration helps reduce manual work and makes scheduling more reliable. I would rate it a 9 out of 10 as it is a powerful and flexible scheduling tool with great customization and solid integrations. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While Cal.com works well overall, there are a few areas where I feel it could improve. The platform offers a lot of customization but this also means the initial setup can feel slightly technical, especially for users who are not familiar with workflow automation or advanced scheduling logic. A more guided onboarding or simpler setup wizard would help new users get started faster. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I love how flexible Cal.com is, allowing me to create different booking flows and customize questions, routing logic, and availability rules for each event type. It's great that it doesn't force a rigid structure and adapts to my workflow. The open-source nature gives me control and trust, knowing I can self-host if needed. The booking pages are clean and professional, reflecting well on my brand. Cal.com handles complex scheduling tasks gracefully, like round-robin and multi-person availability checks, making these effortless. The integrations work smoothly without needing constant monitoring. The time savings are incredible, giving me more focus time, and it beautifully scales with my needs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The initial setup of Cal.com can be overwhelming due to its high customizability, requiring users to dig through menus and documentation. The platform could improve with more guided workflows or an onboarding wizard. There are some limitations in workflow and automation, such as the desire for more built-in automation rules and deeper CRM integrations without relying on external tools. The plugin ecosystem can feel inconsistent, with some plugins not meeting quality standards or having compatibility issues. Teams with complex setups might experience slower loading times or sync delays. The UI/UX could use more visual clarity and modern styling, and the admin-side mobile experience can feel cramped, making some settings hard to manage. Notifications and reminders are functional but could benefit from more customization and branding control. Finally, documentation could be improved, as users have noted missing examples and incomplete plugin docs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Cal.com as my main scheduling platform because it streamlines all my meetings and appointments. I'm impressed by its flexibility and customization, which surpasses many other scheduling tools that stick to rigid templates. I can tailor everything from booking pages and event types to workflows and integrations. I appreciate its open-source nature, ensuring transparency and long-term reliability. The clean, intuitive interface is easy to use for both me and my clients. It integrates seamlessly with my existing tools like calendars, video conferencing apps, CRMs, and more, creating a unified workflow. The performance is solid without any significant glitches. The multi-calendar sync, timezone intelligence, team scheduling, and embedding scheduling widgets directly into websites make booking effortless. All in all, Cal.com stands out as a powerful yet user-friendly scheduling tool that I can control according to my needs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While Cal.com is powerful, there are a few areas that could be improved to make the experience even smoother. Some of the advanced customization options can feel a bit overwhelming at first, especially for new users who aren’t familiar with configuration-heavy tools. Certain integrations also require manual setup or extra steps that could be more streamlined. I’ve noticed that occasionally the interface feels slightly cluttered when managing multiple event types, and cleaner organization would help. Additionally, while the platform is highly flexible, some users might appreciate more built-in templates or simplified presets to speed up setup. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Cal.com to manage all my client bookings and automate my meeting schedule efficiently. I love how customizable and flexible it is, allowing me to tailor almost every aspect of the booking experience, from the look and feel of the booking page to setting complex availability rules. It integrates smoothly with my calendars and meeting tools, meaning everything syncs automatically. The open-source approach gives me confidence in its transparency, security, and constant improvements. I also appreciate that I can embed booking links anywhere, making the scheduling process feel effortless. The ability to handle payments through Stripe during booking is seamless, reducing no-shows and saving me a lot of administrative time. Cal.com also adapts to different types of meetings with separate event types, each with its own settings and automations. The integrations with calendar, video meeting tools, and payment platforms drastically reduce scheduling errors. Overall, Cal.com feels more like a flexible scheduling framework that grows with my needs and is extremely valuable for my day-to-day work. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While I really like using Cal.com, there are a few areas that could be improved. The first is the learning curve, because the platform is so customizable, it can take some time to figure out the more advanced settings. For simple use cases it's easy, but if you want to build complex workflows or automations, you may have to experiment quite a bit. Another area that could be better is customer support. While the documentation is helpful, sometimes I’ve had questions where I wished the support responses were faster or more detailed, especially when dealing with technical setups or integrations. Lastly, because the platform is powerful and evolving quickly, there are occasional small bugs or UI inconsistencies. Nothing major, but sometimes features feel like they’re still being polished, especially in more advanced modules or team-based scheduling. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Using the Cal.com Teams/Organization plan has been a major upgrade for our scheduling and workflow management. Cal.com’s team scheduling features have made scheduling extremely simple and efficient. Another feature that really stands out is the meeting routing system, which automatically directs incoming bookings to the right team member based on availability, skill set, or priority, helping streamline our client onboarding process and reducing missed appointments. It automates scheduling, removes human error, and ensures every meeting goes to the right team member at the right time. Cal.com syncs perfectly with our calendars, preventing double-booking and ensuring accurate schedules are visible across the team. Cal.com was our first full-featured scheduling system, and it immediately improved our process by centralizing team availability, automating meeting assignments, and reducing back-and-forth communication. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Cal.com is extremely powerful, but the setup, integrations, and dashboard customization could be smoother, especially for new team members. New users sometimes feel overwhelmed by all the options. A more structured onboarding flow would help new team members get comfortable faster. More pre-built templates would reduce the time spent configuring everything manually. Some settings are very technical, and a short explanation or example beside each option would make onboarding smoother. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.