BrowserStack Reviews & Product Details

Its versatility, Easy Usage and emulators to provide real time devices as well the features to inspect traffic on mobile apps. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It has a very basic UI and not fully responsive, the features are provided well but scattered over different modules. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What stands out most about BrowserStack is its ability to let you test across multiple real devices and browsers without needing to maintain your own device lab. It also makes deployment easy and includes efficient bug logging and tracking, helping teams find and fix issues quickly during the testing process. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One thing I dislike about BrowserStack is that I wish it had annotation features and allowed for chats or comments, similar to what Figma offers. This would make it easier for teams to collaborate directly within the platform when sharing bugs or feedback. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Makes cross-browser and cross-device testing seamless. I can instantly spin up real devices (iOS/Android) and different browser versions without maintaining my own device lab. The UI is intuitive, speed is good. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Pricing can also be a bit steep for small teams or freelancers. Would love to see more generous free usage for individual developers and testers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Quick access to many different systems, you can't have that many devices. If you want to debug display errors on exotic devices, there's nothing better. The different versions also allow testing of "older devices". Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Many of the advanced features do not work reliably. Sometimes it works, then it's broken again.

The clipboard only works very unreliably for me. Alternatives should be offered here. If a stable integration is not possible, I would already be satisfied with a text input where I can "paste".

The camera feed is not reliably supported. In Firefox, I currently don't get a camera, the VR mode of Chrome where you can walk through an apartment and upload pictures currently crashes in S32 (Chrome crashes every time).

Local testing is too restricted. The tunnel to localhost is useless for the integration of third-party services, as they only run under localhost (in dev mode) or under the production URL. Scandit, for example, blocks usage if it doesn't happen from localhost, so the integration cannot be tested. Access via bs-local.com is not possible. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Below are some of the points which we find very helpful while using Browser stack:

1. ease of use.

2. easy integration with project collaboration tools like Azure dev ops and Jira.

3. Wide variety of device and browser configurations which can be utilized for our software test needs.

4. Coming up with new age AI solutions to accelerate your test activities.

5. Good support on non functional testing like Performance, Accessibility etc.

6. Good customer support. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Below are areas where browser stack can improve.

1. Availability of physical devices as some business use case require same.

2. More integration with ERP testing needs for SAP and service now.

3. More support on running scripts from tools like TOSCA or UI Path. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

BrowserStack makes it simple to test websites and applications across multiple browsers and devices without maintaining a physical lab. The real device access and automation support save a lot of setup time Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes the sessions can lag on slower internet connections, and pricing may feel high for small teams. The learning curve for advanced features could be smoother Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

the ease of having an environment to perform mobile testing, which is what I currently use it for, is practical and simple Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

perhaps the amount of resources required to be able to use it, very heavy at times Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The ease of being able to test my builds on different browsers and devices when I build web pages. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The slowing load times when loading up a URL to test. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The ability to perform app testing and browser testing through many different apple, android and other devices easily Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Many instances occur where UI bugs that appear on physical devices are not re creatable on browserstack (Not much we can do in determining what the cause of this is) Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

With the very simple UI, this is a very user friendly platform. With the massive access granting in the cloud, we don't need to maintain number of physical devices as well as different browser versions.

With the cross browser testing we can ensure the look of the website and the functions are working correctly on various browsers. With the cross device testing we can verify our product is working well on a variety of mobile devices.

As this supports for both manual and automated testing, the work is more easier.

The customer support is also very professional and supportive. Integrating with other apps makes work much easier. Also when purchased it allows unlimited usage to test which is totally worth the money. Implementation is also much easier and quicker than the other alternatives. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

When purchasing the parallel testing, it is limited to 1. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.