One of the things that I like about BackBox is that it assists in avoiding misconfigurations of our network devices. Our online retail IT setting is full of routers and firewalls that have to be constantly updated and the platform is perfect in ensuring that any change is documented and backed up. With alerts and versioning and data provided by SolarWinds and incident tickets provided by ServiceNow we have the opportunity to identify problems before they can impact service. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

A weakness that I have observed in BackBox is that it is a bit cumbersome to write reports on several devices simultaneously. At times, to get a consolidated view of all backups in our IT team, we have had to manually export data in the platform, which will add additional work. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The most appropriate thing about BackBox is that it guards our infrastructure, backing up all network devices automation. When it comes to the management of IT systems, I was involved in the process of manual backups that were costly in terms of time, and in some cases, the configurations were lost. BackBox offers a scheduled backup, a versioning facility and automated restore which is a massive relief. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

My experience shows that one of the weaknesses of BackBox is that not all external alerting configurations can be configured automatically. In IT operations, the implementation of BackBox with Slack or ServiceNow to receive notifications in their entirety required some troubleshooting, now and then. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

My favorite feature of BackBox is the manner in which it looks after repetitive network tasks in an organized manner. The implementation process was not disruptive because it was seen as controlled. We have connected it to ServiceNow and our alerting systems within the company so that changes and backups are synchronized. I spend almost every day on the platform, which demonstrates how it is an important part of my everyday life. My work is much more predictable due to the number of features that are oriented to device configuration and policy validation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

A disadvantage of BackBox is that certain complex workflows need more technical scripting expertise slowing down the assimilation amongst junior team members. As part of the implementation, we discovered that some jobs could not be customized as easily as they were supposed to be customized. Although it can be integrated with other systems, it may need time to fine-tune all connections. This affects our work as it introduces additional procedures when we are in need of deploying new automation operations fast. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The greatest benefit of BackBox to me is that it paves consistency in network operations. I use it day by day to support configurations throughout routers and security appliances, a level of manual intervention is minimized. We matched it with our service desk platform internally to record the results of tasks in order to comply. The implementation was a matter of planning, but once it was done it became part of our routine. It is able to maintain stable infrastructure due to its automation capabilities. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The thing that I consider difficult about BackBox is the preparation that has to be done at the start. Determining the type of devices and establishing correct credentials was more time consuming. Our frequency of use is high and so even slight set-up errors impacted on scheduled tasks. The features are robust, but the features can cause the environment to be technical. This added work load to our network team at the initial stages. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Backbox enables automation without the need to write code using its built-in workflows.

They added support in order to verify alignment with multiple compliance standards Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Enhance integration with ITSM solutions specifically JIRA and implement AI capabilities to prioritize alerting. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like BackBox since it will provide our IT department with assurance in recoverability preparedness. The version history of automated backups of the network devices or server that has gone down means that we can have the networks reconfigured in a short period of time. It has enhanced our daily workflow, and the characteristics of grouping the devices and controlling the storage allocations have helped us to preserve the compliance as well as prevent any inconveniences during the updates or maintenance windows. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The ability to control the complexity of groups of devices and backup versions at the same time is the primary disadvantage to me. Making sure that devices were carefully mapped to schedules during rollout was necessary. The mistakes are easily spotted because of the number of times that they are used on a daily basis, which might have an impact on the confidence with the system. This is because alerting is a simple procedure, hence additional time is required to verify the failed backups and intervention. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like that BackBox is web-based, making it simple to use and easy to add and manage devices along with their configurations. It's valuable because even a novice can use it with just a bit networking experience. I also appreciate their technical support which is very hands-on and helpful. Setting it up was very easy, and we managed to get it up and running within a couple of days. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I would like to see Backbox continue to mature toward a full configuration management across common network and security device types. While Backbox is very strong in back and very basic config management, there is a gap when it comes to declarative, repeatable configuration management at scale. I'd like to see functionality found in Ansible and Terraform which allows me to define desires config state, manage config drift, and apply consistent conf across many devices. Would also be nice to see some sort of AI agent that would help automate all tasks within backbox Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really like BackBox for the basic tasks of backing up and restoring device configurations. Its ease of use stands out, especially the ability to create scripts easily to gather different information from equipment or push configurations to devices. Another great aspect is the flexibility around custom and additional scripts, which helps automate repetitive specific tasks. This is particularly beneficial for backups, pre/post-upgrade checks, and config validation. Initial setup was straightforward; once you configure a service account for backups with the first equipment, you can easily replicate this setup to add more equipment. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don't like the lack of visibility and reporting with custom reports or trend views. Troubleshooting is difficult when a device is not able to be backed up because the logs are not easy to read and sometimes misleading, it's like only the support team can decode them. The API integration for adding equipment at scale needs improvement, for example using a CSV file with authentication to add multiple devices at once. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I appreciate BackBox for its fast disaster recovery operations and strong multi-vendor support. I also value its strong API ecosystem, which adds a lot to my user experience. The setup process was smooth, which made it easy for me to get started. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think expanding the API and integration would make it easier to connect BackBox with DevOps and ITSM tools. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I appreciate most about BackBox is its ease of use for backing up and managing network equipment configurations. The interface is clear and intuitive, which greatly simplifies daily operations, even with a large number of devices to manage. The automation features save a lot of time, especially for scheduled backups, compliance checks, and configuration comparisons. I also appreciate the reliability of the solution: backups run smoothly and restorations are simple and effective when needed. Finally, BackBox support is very responsive and competent, which is a real asset in a critical network environment. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are ultimately quite few major negative points to report. It can be noted that some advanced features require a slightly longer learning curve, especially for very specific scenarios or deep integrations with other tools. The interface, although generally clear, could sometimes be even more customizable to adapt to very particular use cases. Finally, depending on the size of the infrastructure, processing times for some massive operations can be improved, even though it remains acceptable in the majority of situations. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.