Azure Web Apps is a good solution to quickly run a website if there is application code or container image available. Also as Azure Web Apps is PaaS (Platform as a Service), Microsoft takes care of managing underlying infrastructure and managing them like monitoring, patching etc features. Azure Web Apps also comes up with different SKU plans which can be chosen based on expected workloads and autoscale can also be used for auto-scale up and scale down for better website performance. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Although not much to complain about Azure Web Apps, but as an improvement, it should allow more application platforms and versions to run different types of application code. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is simple to build up Azure WebApps, and they are available in a range of languages. Azure Resource Manager provides comprehensive support for web apps. Many different installation options are available for WebApps. The integration with Visual Project is also quite good. The AutoScale functionality of WebApps guarantees all your service grows and shrinks in response to changes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Microsoft is in complete control of the cloud hardware. That means that Microsoft may update the VM containing the web apps without prior notice. However, in the majority of cases, they are normal. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It ease admin and user and easy to navigate Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Microsoft keeps on changing & adding new very frequently. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The support from Azure is the best; the support people are very helpful. Also, the panels are very rich, and the invoice; you can check everything related to your account. Even you can set some limits following your budget. Currently, there are a lot of services and features; for example, speaking about the limit and budgets; you can set that limit and the service will not go further than the set limit. This is very helpful if you want to avoid surprises in your invoices. Also, there are options for the Host Name; in that case, you can avoid paying Host Names; for example, in our case, the user will land to a normal page and after that will be redirected to the App and for the app, we were using a Host Name provided by Azure. The admins and developers can start to check some certificates and grow in the platform. This is very helpful because it has a lot of options and features if you can use them well probably you will get the best from it. Another thing is they offer you a credit to start playing with the service which is pretty cool because that will cover your start learning curve. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

If you do not have the knowledge you can have a hard time. In my case, I set up a web App with some resources that do not apply to the size of our app; so we went through higher invoice costs; the good thing here was the Support; people from support understand our situation and our mistake and they give us a Bono to pay those invoices. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

*Azure DevOps reduce the execution time Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

*MS Azure reduce the test execution time Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

GitHub deployment, integration with API functions, built-in role-based router access protection via authentication model Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Slow deployment times, lack of basic password-based and also custom user authentication Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

These are the points, which I liked most:

Highly-secure web apps development,

Multilingual and versatile framework,

Global Scale with high availability,

Improved developer productivity with Application Templates,

Secure integration with other SaaS apps. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are some limitations of Azure web app.

Remote Desktop Is Not Available,

Limits on Installing 3rd Party Software and Management Tools,

Performance Counters Are Not Available Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Host any web app, communications with API is easy, multi language support. Good documentation is there for learning Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Could be more scalable and robust.

Could be more easy to integrate and update

Dynamic update is little challenging Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

the advantage of azure is that it can make web apps features for free, making it very easy for beginners to learn Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

the system sometimes displays a 404 error when launching the web on this cloud computing Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It provides free tier app service plan for trying and testing before moving to production.

The whole integrated ecosystem with its IDE which enables one-click publishing.

On the fly changing of framework stack (.NET, Python, PHP, .NET core, Java) & remote debugging.

Best of all, it is very easy to authorise user with SSO. Enabling HTTPS. Containerized deployment.

Auto-Scaling as configured and enhancing web apps with API management.

Stagging web apps for testing before moving to production. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The only thing which I don't like is its windows stack offering for Python. Officially Microsoft doesn't support python app deployment on Windows Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.