Load Balancer is simple to create and well integrate with other Azure resources such as Scale Set, Web App and it provides almost feature we need with layer 4 Load balancer: Destination selection, Port forwarding, Automatic reconfiguration, Health probes...

We could use the Basic SKU for free and it has all the features we need for small or medium applications Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Documentation is not clear enough and configures health probes base on backend service in the portal is confusing Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Azure Load Balancer permits us to allocate the load across multiple servers. The simplest half is it's the choice of each free and customary option. however it's a decent choice to begin with Free version though it has restricted practicality and for our case it absolutely quite enough. for a beginner its best to proceed with the free version. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The peering should be done over IP Sec tunnels not native peering.

The feature set on the far side basic load equalization is proscribed.

Yet the pricing model is bit huge. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

it easily manage and share web site traffic with multiple server so it protects the website from the denial of service. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

this configuration documents are not clear so hard to understand the concept when we try to configure the system. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I liked the simplicity of adding your VMS to availability sets then being able to easily target and set health probes and rules to the selected VM's Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The inability to add an existing VM to an availability set Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Azure Load Balancer is fairly easy to set up, We use it to provide front-ends for our SQL servers. Once it's set up, it works as advertised. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

You are unable to access ALB endpoints from other vnets peered. The peering must be done over (more expensive) IPSec tunnels not native peering. The feature set beyond basic load balancing is limited, Session stickyness is very basic and load balancing rules don't allow custom patterns. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The best part is that the Azure load balancer is able to automatically add resources to the pool when scaling up or down. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Having fully tested and deployed several Azure load balancers we are not seeing anything to dislike about the product. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Azure Load Balancer allows us to distribute the load across multiple servers. The best part is it has the option of both free and standard option. Though Free version has limited functionality but it is a good option to start with and for our case it was more than enough. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

At this point and the amount of testing we have done I dont see any specific drawback. As I mentioned we have tested with free option which server our need Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I love being able to have high availability in my applications and knowing that Azure Balancer can check which one has the best performance to make the connection. You can protect your internal and external network with NAT. It is compatible with the new IPv6 technology. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Not being a physical balancer, the power of manipulation and updating is lost. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Firstly, it is very to use and configure to use Load Balancer for the azure web app. The secondly, it works very well and can handle many request coming to the website and has effective method to dividing the traffic. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The detection which web app is having issue is not good. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

This cloud platform serves our company's needs. The analysis of application performance is especially usefull. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The interface is not very attractive and could be improved. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.