Application Gateway offers a comprehensive suite of layer 7 load balancing features. At the application layer, it effectively routes traffic based on attributes such as URL or cookie, providing advanced load balancing capabilities. Additionally, it incorporates a built-in Web Application Firewall (WAF) to safeguard web applications against prevalent threats like SQL injection and cross-site scripting. Furthermore, it manages SSL termination, alleviating the backend servers from the burden of SSL encryption/decryption processes. The support for session affinity ensures that subsequent client requests are consistently directed to the same backend server, enhancing stability. Moreover, the URL-based routing functionality enables precise traffic routing to various backend pools based on specific URL paths, granting finer control over routing configurations. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The Application Gateway poses several limitations, such as its primary support for HTTP/HTTPS, neglecting other protocols and potentially restricting various application types. Scaling challenges emerge when faced with heavy traffic loads, exhibiting slower scalability compared to alternative Azure load balancing solutions. Moreover, its configuration complexity demands a comprehensive understanding of its multifaceted features. Cost escalation is likely as additional functionalities, like WAF, coupled with increased traffic, may result in higher billing. Additionally, performance concerns may arise in specific scenarios or high-traffic instances due to inherent design constraints and limitations. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Microsoft Azure Cloud has various solution categories, advanced security capabilities, and well-documented services. The data and AI services and tools are easy to use within the Azure user interface and drag-and-drop features in a low-code environment. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some of the services and data warehouse solutions in Microsoft Azure Cloud are confusing and make it hard to decide on the optimal service, tool, or cloud application that suits the project. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are several applications and advantages of using Azure Application Gateway:

1. It can handle SSL termination, so application layer doesn't need to bother.

2. URL based routing for balancing load on different microservices.

3. We can select load balancing strategy like Round Robbin, weighted round robbin etc to distribute load based of backend capabilities.

4. It also supports session affinity to redirect users to same backend application on consecutive requests in same session

5.Automatic scaling

6. In built Web application firewall to filter bot and malicious traffic.

Must have for scaling applications hosted on Azure - be it AKS, docker containers or application hosted on VM. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Not much user friendly and requires bit of expertise to configure.

AWS application load balancer is much easier to setup for beginners.

Also it only supports HTTP protocol, hence can not be used for other applications like SMTP server.

Can only be used with application hosted in azure ecosystem. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

a cost effective solution of cloud management system.

security is also great in this app Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Dont support multiple operating system .

Also need expertise in same program to do some changes Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The wonderful advantages of this web traffic load balancing tool include url-based routing, autoscaling, the confidence we have in Microsoft's security measures, and an excellent uptime SLA. In summary, it's a fantastic tool for controlling and safeguarding web traffic and apps. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Although I am pleased with the performance of this tool, there are a few aspects that may be improved, such as the fact that it occasionally affects network performance and Azure should strive to reduce costs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What is most helpful is that it enables you to manage traffic to your Web applications, simple, and easily. The upsides is the application, gateway, layout and design from the image server pool to the video server pool is simple and easy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes I can find lag between the gateway, that could just be my experience on it overall. I will often use it multiple times per day and the customer support received is excellent when I need it Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is more beneficial for our organization to migrate from on-premise to cloud due to the pay-as-you-go model, scalability, and elasticity. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The dislike about Microsoft Azure is GUI,there can improve the user interface more user friendly Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Azure Application Gateway is a powerful load balancing solution it has lots of advantages. Some of them are:

Comprehensive load balancing competencies: It can perform load balancing primarily based on a range of things, inclusive of URL direction, HTTP headers and cookies which makes it perfect for load balancing an extensive range of net packages.

Web application firewall (WAF): It consists of an integrated WAF that may assist guard your internet applications from not unusual attacks including SQL injection, cross-web page scripting etc.

Autoscaling: It can mechanically scale up or down the wide variety of instances it uses based totally on site visitors demand. This allows to make sure that your applications are continually available and performing optimally, even for the duration of top visitors intervals.

Zone redundancy: It may be deployed in a sector-redundant configuration to provide high availability and disaster healing. This means that if one zone for your Azure vicinity is going down, your applications will nonetheless be available within the other zones.

Easy to apply: It is simple to configure and control through the Azure portal or Azure PowerShell. This makes it reachable to users of all skill levels. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Here are some of the things I don’t like about Azure Application Gateway:

Challenges: It can be difficult to set up and maintain, especially for users who are not familiar with the product.

Price: Azure Application Gateway can be expensive, especially for high-traffic businesses.

Limitations: Azure Application Gateway has some limitations, such as its inability to balance traffic between VPNs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Azure Application Gateway filters traffic at Application Layer (Layer 7) of OSI Model. Here it differs from traditional load balancers which filters traffic at transport layer (layer 4) of OSI model. This makes a special to use Azure App Gateway to make routing decisions based on incoming URL. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The user interface of Azure Application gateway is bit complex and that Microsoft has to take care as per my view, it can be better with slight changes in GUI. More detailed logging is required if you are going to use it for your day to day activities. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I favor this Azure solution., because of its superior Web Application Firewall and load balancing services, scalability, ease of implementation, high Availability SLA, security features, and traffic handling capacity. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I am content with most of the capabilities, however there is room for development in areas like setup flexibility, resource renaming, and affordability. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.