What I find very useful in PSF is that you can work clearly see the metrics that are having the biggest impact on the team. From those metrics, I was able to tweak the team's process to see an immediate improvement. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

PSF provides a wealth of data, so I understand that it's a challenge to mesh this all together this content in a digestible format. I feel that UX experience needs some work, especially around how users can navigate between screens, as it can sometime feel clunky. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Pluralsight is continually improving upon and extending its flow services. Whilst the first iteration already gave me basic insight into the performance of my teams, the most current version gives me useful tips and advice based on the actual metrics provided. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It takes a bit of work getting the proper data in Pluralsight. Our codebase tends to move around which means we will have to re-add it to Pluralsight. This does work without issues or disruptions to the metrics, but Pluralsight does not alert you that the data has stopped coming in. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It has easy dashboards to use to review the behavior of the team mattes. You can perform a follow on each teammate or even review the team as one. You can easily check metrics like commits per day, or response and easily compare an individual against the team. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is something that they are trying to enhance, but I would like to have better goals. Currently, the goals are difficult to set per member or user; it will be cool to have some more "engagement tools", like send it emails to encourage you to accomplish the previously set goals and etc. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The wide variety of reports and the granularity of the metrics it gathers and provides. As an Engineering Manager, it's been an invaluable tool to help guide my developers to better coding practices and to gain insights on how well they are doing as a whole. I love how it gives me the insights to try to catch performance issues early to better work with my developers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing really comes to mind... It's intuitive, the documentation is FANTASTIC and it has a LOT of data it grabs. Sometimes the developers are missing or the merge suggestions are wrong but that's very minor. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The way the information is organized Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

just too many options that sometimes one gets lost Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The amount of insights and flexibility of building reports that drive conversations around efficiency and improvements. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The UI can be a little difficult in some areas. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The innumerable amount of insights that the tool provides is the main positive point.

Simple integration with repository and ticks. Easy configuration of teams and goals. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Frequent changes in the layout and arrangement of information make it difficult to use it consistently and standardized across teams, requiring constant training.

Many functionalities are made available incompletely, making it unfeasible to use and without a detailed description of what the problem is. Some of them we are interested in using, but rarely work right away. We need to keep an eye on it for a few weeks until we notice that it has started to work. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Pluralsight Flow is a powerful tool designed for software development teams to help them visualize their workflow and optimize their processes. As a language model, I don't have firsthand experience with Pluralsight Flow, but I can provide an overview based on what I know.

One of the key benefits of Pluralsight Flow is that it provides teams with detailed metrics and insights into their development process. This includes information on things like cycle time, lead time, and throughput, which can help teams identify bottlenecks and areas for improvement. The platform also provides real-time visibility into work in progress, making it easier for team members to stay aligned and coordinate their efforts.

Another advantage of Pluralsight Flow is that it integrates with a wide range of other tools commonly used in software development, including GitHub, Jira, and Trello. This means that teams can easily track their progress across different systems and tools, and get a more comprehensive view of their development process.

Pluralsight Flow also has several features that are designed to promote collaboration and teamwork. For example, team members can use the platform to leave comments and feedback on specific tasks, helping to keep everyone on the same page and ensure that work is progressing smoothly. The platform also includes automated alerts and notifications to help teams stay up-to-date on important events and milestones.

Overall, Pluralsight Flow is a valuable tool for software development teams looking to optimize their workflows and improve their processes. Its combination of detailed metrics, real-time visibility, and collaboration features make it a powerful solution for teams looking to work more efficiently and effectively. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

relatively high cost compared to other similar tools, the learning curve required to fully utilize its features, and the fact that it may not be suitable for smaller development teams with simpler workflows. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As a manager, it helps me identify whether the team needs help applying good coding metrics. Developers can also self-evaluate as those are available to everyone. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The UI is hard to navigate; buttons aren't clear where they will take you; sometimes, it takes many clicks to get to where we want to go, like seeing a single person's metrics, for example. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use it for my own motivation. I like seeing that there is a tool that validates that I'm doing lots of work, whether that's reviewing other merge requests, making comments, or pushing commits.

It helps with best practices. It's good to create short commits that are atomic and small, and the graph makes you want to do that. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's a little but clunky.

But, setting that aside, sometimes I forget to check it. I don't have a reason to check in very often. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.