# Amplitude Web Experimentation Reviews **Vendor:** Amplitude **Category:** [A/B Testing Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/a-b-testing-tools) **Average Rating:** 3.5/5.0 **Total Reviews:** 15 ## About Amplitude Web Experimentation Part of the Amplitude AI Analytics Platform, Amplitude Web Experimentation lets you test, personalize, and optimize your online experiences without any code. Test faster and get more meaningful results to drive better conversion. Web Experimentation makes it easy for growth teams, marketing teams, product teams, or any team to run better web-based tests: • Self-service experimentation guides you through designing, shipping, and seeing results—no engineering resources needed • Quickly craft variants for landing pages, campaigns, and more in a drag-and-drop visual editor that works with any CMS • Performance capabilities like T-tests, CUPED, and multi-arm bandits let you test rigorously without sacrificing control • Target precisely with behavioral cohorts and identity resolution that fuel personalize at scale • Unlock a culture of experimentation with increased testing velocity and results you can share across your org And with Web Experimentation integrated in the rest of the Amplitude platform, your tests connect seamlessly with your insights. Spin up a conversion test from a funnel chart, watch tester behavior in session replays, and retarget based on experiment data. Plus, you can consolidate your tech stack. Amplitude Web Experimentation is a smarter, faster way to test and innovate. Ditch the guesswork and discover what really drives growth. ## Amplitude Web Experimentation Pros & Cons **What users like:** - Users appreciate the **easy setup** of Amplitude Web Experimentation, enabling quick and efficient experimentation without developer reliance. (7 reviews) - Users value the **ease of use** of Amplitude Web Experimentation, enabling quick setups and seamless integration with analytics. (6 reviews) - Users appreciate the **seamless integration** of Web Experimentation with Amplitude Analytics, enhancing the ease of tracking experiments. (5 reviews) - Users appreciate the **quick setup** of Amplitude Web Experimentation, enabling seamless and efficient experiment launches with minimal friction. (4 reviews) - Users appreciate the **seamless integrations** of Amplitude Web Experimentation, enhancing convenience and analytics accessibility across the platform. (3 reviews) - Users value the **intuitive interface** of Amplitude Web Experimentation, enabling easy experimentation without engineering involvement. (3 reviews) - Time-saving (3 reviews) - Analytics (2 reviews) - Users value the **efficiency** of Amplitude Web Experimentation, enabling quick setup and seamless experimentation without developer assistance. (2 reviews) - Users value the **independence of web experiments** , enhancing speed and ease for teams without technical expertise. (2 reviews) **What users dislike:** - Users struggle with **difficult navigation** , finding the interface and HTML editing challenging, especially for non-developers. (3 reviews) - Users find the **limited features** of Amplitude Web Experimentation frustrating, impacting experimentation rigor and setup ease. (3 reviews) - Users find **missing features** in Amplitude Web Experimentation, such as clunky editing and lack of holdout groups, frustrating. (3 reviews) - Users find Amplitude Web Experimentation **not intuitive** , facing challenges in setup and understanding key functionalities. (3 reviews) - Users face **bug issues** with Amplitude Web Experimentation, leading to delays in support and challenging editing experiences. (2 reviews) - Users find **editing issues** with Amplitude Web Experimentation frustrating, limiting flexibility and functionality in component management. (2 reviews) - Lack of Guidance (2 reviews) - Users express frustration over **limitations in flexibility** and mobile performance, impacting experimentation effectiveness and user experience. (2 reviews) - Low Resolution (2 reviews) - Poor Customer Support (2 reviews) ## Amplitude Web Experimentation Reviews ### 1. From 1–2 day dev cycles to minutes: self-serve experiments that actually ship **Rating:** 3.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Kyle K. | Staff Product Manager, Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** October 16, 2025 **What do you like best about Amplitude Web Experimentation?** The biggest strength is how seamlessly Web Experimentation fits with Amplitude Analytics. Having experiments and analytics in one place makes it much easier to track conversion and revenue by experiment cohort, without having to stitch data together across multiple tools. Setup and launching experiments feel straightforward and low-friction. The WYSIWYG editor is a standout: it’s intuitive and powerful enough that I can run quick experiments myself without pulling in developers, which speeds up iteration and keeps engineering focused on other work. **What do you dislike about Amplitude Web Experimentation?** The WYSIWYG editor can feel clunky or get out of sync at times. When that happens, you often have to dig into the edit history and remove or clean up steps before the experiment behaves as expected. It’s usually fixable, but it adds unnecessary friction. A bigger limitation is the lack of support for holdout groups. Being able to run web experiments easily is a big plus, but without proper holdout capability, the rigor and long-term value of experimentation are limited. That’s a real drawback for teams that care about clean measurement and true incrementality. **What problems is Amplitude Web Experimentation solving and how is that benefiting you?** Before Web Experimentation, even small, visual-only tests—like swapping a hero image or tweaking copy—still required a developer and about 1–2 days of work. Now we can launch those same tests in minutes, with no developer involvement. That change means our design team can run their own experiments instead of waiting on engineering, and we’re seeing results at least a week sooner. Because we can run more experiments within the same time window, it’s accelerated our learning and made it easier to iterate quickly on the experiences that matter most. ### 2. Solid Tool with Some A/B Testing Confusion **Rating:** 3.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Sejin L. | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** March 13, 2026 **What do you like best about Amplitude Web Experimentation?** I like the Visual Editor and Customizable Metrics in Amplitude Web Experimentation. It's great that our Project Manager can set it up easily without needing help from developers. **What do you dislike about Amplitude Web Experimentation?** I have set up Amplitude Analytics and Experiments with the proper deployment key, but the network response from Amplitude was an empty object {}. The concept is misleading with the Experiment Feature Flag. I was confused about what I should use for A/B testing. I had to use a feature flag with adding an event in the end for A/B testing. Better to rename the menu or give a clear guideline according to the user's purpose. The initial setup was not easy because of the confusion I mentioned. **What problems is Amplitude Web Experimentation solving and how is that benefiting you?** I use Amplitude Web Experimentation to gain insights into user interactions with different form elements. The Visual Editor and Customizable Metrics allow our Project Manager to set it up easily without developer help. **Official Response from Amanda Brush:** > Sejin, Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback. It’s great to hear the Visual Editor and flexible metrics helps your team evaluate user behavior without heavy developer involvement. We’re sorry the setup and A/B testing workflow felt confusing; for website tests, Web Experimentation is built specifically for no-code A/B tests, while Feature Experiments use flags under the hood for product changes, and an empty {} response can also happen when no variants are returned for a user. Amplitude Academy and our Web Experimentation setup docs can help clarify those paths. Thanks again for your thoughtful feedback! ### 3. Good Promise, Needs Better Support and Precision **Rating:** 2.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Juan Daniel F. | Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** March 04, 2026 **What do you like best about Amplitude Web Experimentation?** What I like most about Amplitude Web Experimentation is the ease of making changes to page content with the visual change tool. It's quite easy to use, although I also feel that it is somewhat limited. Another thing I find very interesting is the ability to customize who to show the experiments to, which I consider to be a standout feature. I also find the content editing part directly within Amplitude interesting, although it is true that it has its limitations. **What do you dislike about Amplitude Web Experimentation?** The first thing that comes to mind is the support, it hasn't been entirely good. With the plan I have, I don't have live support, which makes it difficult to solve problems or understand why things fail. Additionally, there is a 'variant jumping' issue, it affects the data and they don't give us a clear solution in support. Also, when I make visual edits to the content, if I include new content, it is reflected in the "control" which doesn't make sense. Finally, when doing more complex tests and moving things around in the structure, everything starts to break and it works quite poorly. **What problems is Amplitude Web Experimentation solving and how is that benefiting you?** I use Amplitude Web Experimentation to conduct A/B tests and improve conversion metrics. Although it presents issues like variant jumping, it allows you to control them and obtain reliable data statistically. **Official Response from Amanda Brush:** > Hi Juan Daniel, Thank you for taking the time to leave this thoughtful review. We love to hear that Web Experimentation is helping you run A/B tests to improve conversion, and that the visual editor and audience targeting are making it easier to tailor experiences without a heavy engineering lift. We’re sorry the support experience, variant-jumping concerns, and reliability of more complex visual changes have been frustrating. We do have docs on debugging variant jumping plus guidance on page scoping, selectors, and custom code for more advanced edits. Amplitude Academy also offers Web Experimentation training. Thanks again for your helpful feedback. ### 4. Great Amplitude Metrics Integration, but Experimentation Setup Isn’t Intuitive **Rating:** 3.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Publishing | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** February 26, 2026 **What do you like best about Amplitude Web Experimentation?** The integration with Amplitude analytics lets us use metrics that are already available and widely understood across the business, while also giving us the flexibility to create new metrics as needed. **What do you dislike about Amplitude Web Experimentation?** The experimentation features aren’t always intuitive. For example, to set up an A/A test we currently need to add a console log to the variant so that Amplitude will serve traffic to both variants. Otherwise, it only recognises the control and won’t split traffic equally, even when the test is set up that way. It would be great if there were an A/A test toggle to bypass this. There also isn’t an option to set up a heatmap for the experiment, which would be really useful to view alongside the experiment results. Finally, despite obtaining the Amplitude Specialist – Experiment certificate, I don’t feel I was prepared to use the platform. There are a lot of scenarios and edge cases that would have been helpful to cover in the certificate, but they sadly weren’t included. **What problems is Amplitude Web Experimentation solving and how is that benefiting you?** Not sure how to answer this question - we're using it as an experimentation tool. **Official Response from Amanda Brush:** > Thank you for taking the time to share this thoughtful review. It’s great to hear that connecting Web Experimentation to your existing Amplitude metrics helps you test with measures that are already trusted across the business, while still giving you flexibility to define new metrics when needed. We’re sorry that setting up A/A tests, the lack of built‑in heatmaps in Web Experimentation, and the depth of the Experiment Specialist training left you feeling underprepared—your feedback on toggles, visual analysis, and more advanced education and edge‑case coverage is extremely helpful as we continue to improve. ### 5. Facilitates Tests, But Could Improve in Speed **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Diego D. | Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** March 06, 2026 **What do you like best about Amplitude Web Experimentation?** I like the ease of setting up the dashboards for the results, they are quite easy and any product manager, even non-technical profiles, can do it. Also, the initial setup was simple and the Amplitude team helped us. **What do you dislike about Amplitude Web Experimentation?** The methodology used by Amplitude Web Experimentation to assess the statistical significance of a test is a bit slow. For businesses that need to conduct very quick tests, this is an inconvenience, as sometimes the data volume is not sufficient. It would be interesting to have a more dynamic mode, even though it might be riskier due to less volume and possibly less reliable results, but that allows obtaining results before waiting a long time. **What problems is Amplitude Web Experimentation solving and how is that benefiting you?** I use Amplitude Web Experimentation to optimize the product according to user preferences. ### 6. Easy Setup and Collaboration, But Limited Web Component Flexibility **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Jake S. | Growth Marketing Manager, Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** October 27, 2025 **What do you like best about Amplitude Web Experimentation?** I really like how easy it is to set up and use. It walks you through a really structured setup of the experiment to make sure you've considered every variable necessary to make it a success. We also use Amplitude for product experiments, so it allows our product and marketing teams to see what each other is working on at any given time. **What do you dislike about Amplitude Web Experimentation?** I wish you could more easily move web components around. We decided to go with Amplitude for this because the A/B test add-on for our website platform was too expensive, but this really doesn't go as far as we need it to in order to really make it the best possible tool for us. It's pretty limited to edits that you can make within the existing structure. **What problems is Amplitude Web Experimentation solving and how is that benefiting you?** Allows us to A/B test on our website for the first time, so it's been a great entry tool for that. **Official Response from Amanda Brush:** > Hi Jake, Thanks for the detailed review! We’re glad Amplitude Web Experimentation made setup straightforward and helps product and marketing stay aligned on what’s running. We hear you on wanting more flexibility to move components around. Here are a couple options you can use today: In the Visual Editor, you can rearrange elements (move within the DOM) and adjust CSS/HTML directly for each variant. This covers many layout tweaks without code deploys. We also added a click‑to‑move experience in the Visual Editor to make element rearrangement even easier for non‑developers. For deeper structural changes (new layouts, dynamic components, cross‑page logic), consider Feature Experiments with flags so engineering can ship code‑level variants and still analyze in Amplitude. If you’d like, we can look at your specific use case and suggest the quickest path to the changes you want: https://support.amplitude.com/ ### 7. Limited in features and reporting is grossly inacurrate **Rating:** 1.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Guillaume L. | Lead CRO, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 21, 2025 **What do you like best about Amplitude Web Experimentation?** The idea that the testing platform is connected directly to Amplitude analytics **What do you dislike about Amplitude Web Experimentation?** The fact that the testing platform isn't allowing deep dive analysis that leverage the existing reporting feature of amplitude analytics and we have experienced a lot of data issues misleading us into the wrong outcome - the customer support that hasn't been very reactive and our account manager being very dismissive about it ("it is free what do you expect"?). The testing tool despite being integrated in Amplitude very much feels like it is a 3rd party tool that was grafted onto the analytics platform but where the integration wasn't full completed. The tool is not mature enough to compete against the big players on the market and the Amplitude team have very much relied on their customers to be the guinea pigs. I believe it has strong potential however it will require some serious effort to make it a reliable and strong contender **What problems is Amplitude Web Experimentation solving and how is that benefiting you?** Originally having a one stop shop where we can do AB testing in the same platform we do analytics to avoid data discrepancy **Official Response from Tamara Kecman:** > Thank you for your candid feedback. We're sorry to hear about the challenges you've faced; especially around reporting accuracy, integration depth, and support responsiveness. That’s not the experience we aim to deliver. We’re actively investing in making the tool more reliable, better integrated with analytics, and more robust overall. Our product team would love to connect directly to learn more about your use cases and challenges—your input is invaluable as we continue to improve. We really appreciate your input, and thanks again for helping us build a better product. ### 8. Flexible and Easy Experiment Setup, but Custom Events and Metrics Feel Limited **Rating:** 3.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Hospitality | Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** March 24, 2026 **What do you like best about Amplitude Web Experimentation?** The flexibility it offers along with the ease of creating experiments **What do you dislike about Amplitude Web Experimentation?** Limitations of adding more custom events and metrics **What problems is Amplitude Web Experimentation solving and how is that benefiting you?** We are trying to run experiments to learn customer experiences online, see how they adapt to small changes we make and then roll out the features/changes to live if the adoption is well and the results are significant ### 9. Amplitude experiment business review and feedback **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Information Technology and Services | Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** November 17, 2025 **What do you like best about Amplitude Web Experimentation?** Convenience and intuitiveness as the platform is connected to analytics and all other blades within the same UI. Easy to get up and running with WYSWYG to setup web experiments with low lift from engineering side. The agentic capabilities allow clients to setup more tests running at the same time and at a higher frequency. Seamless integration with Cohorts makes it easy to have data continuing between capabilities within Amplitude. **What do you dislike about Amplitude Web Experimentation?** Its new(er) to amplitude product engineering team so product support takes longer than analytics support. Flicker issues still remain on clients and that puts it technologically weaker compared to competing experiment platforms. **What problems is Amplitude Web Experimentation solving and how is that benefiting you?** Running iterative A/B tests to improve user experience and optimize customer journeys **Official Response from Amanda Brush:** > Thanks for the detailed review—we’re glad Web Experimentation feels intuitive and convenient alongside Analytics, and that the visual editor, agentic capabilities, and Cohorts integration are helping you run more tests with less engineering lift and keep data flowing across Amplitude. We hear you that Web Experimentation is newer than core Analytics and that support and product polish can feel a bit behind - we’re actively investing in both, including implementation patterns like loading the experiment script early and using our anti‑flicker options to minimize visual flash in production, especially when moving off tag‑manager-based setups. If you’d like us to review your current implementation and flicker behavior, our team is happy to dig in with you via https://support.amplitude.com/. ### 10. Great tool, disruptive potential but room for improvement **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Fund-Raising | Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 22, 2025 **What do you like best about Amplitude Web Experimentation?** It takes away the development time, and opens up and all range of possibilities potentially that are in the hands of the team. It's potentially so easy to set up and launch a test. I find one of the strongest use cases with copywriting team. We always have endless discussions about whihc copy to use, low-code experimentation removes this and allow us to simplytest our hypothesis. **What do you dislike about Amplitude Web Experimentation?** * the tool is affecting our performances on mobile especially, this forced us to limit the use of Web experiments for mobile users, where we have most of the traffic * we have languages subfolders, so far I haven't found a way to address this issue: basically I need to set up a new experiment for each languages (therefore URL), this reduces A LOT the chances of having enough traffic * the interface is not yet perfectly functioning, it's not immediate to select items and understand if the changes was actually applied **What problems is Amplitude Web Experimentation solving and how is that benefiting you?** - copywriting, doing tests for example on CTAs - small UI changes, like changing a CTA or an image - quickly validating some of our hypothesis, almist as a discovery tool, to see if we are hurting traffic or not ### 11. Effortless Setup and Versatile AB Testing Options **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Computer Software | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** November 18, 2025 **What do you like best about Amplitude Web Experimentation?** Setting it up is very straightforward. The Amplitude AB Testing feature offers a good range of settings and options, making it convenient to use. **What do you dislike about Amplitude Web Experimentation?** I haven't found that yet. So far Experimentation looks good. **What problems is Amplitude Web Experimentation solving and how is that benefiting you?** We use this tool to test our landing pages in order to boost the conversion rate of advertising visitors into qualified leads. ### 12. It’s worth spending a few hours of your time to try out this tool. **Rating:** 3.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Carlos Osvaldo C. | Software Engineer, Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** June 27, 2025 **What do you like best about Amplitude Web Experimentation?** The web experimentation feature gives me the ability to test different configurations on my website without having to implement a lot of functionality. It integrates easily with Next.js and works seamlessly with the feature flags provided by Amplitude. **What do you dislike about Amplitude Web Experimentation?** I think the way experiments are created could be improved — it might become a bit complicated for people who aren’t very technical. **What problems is Amplitude Web Experimentation solving and how is that benefiting you?** Amplitude Experiment gives me the ability to set up multiple tests and segment the results. It also provides a simple dashboard that clearly shows the outcomes I’m getting. ### 13. An intuitive environment like Google Optimize, but with room to improve. **Rating:** 2.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Human Resources | Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 01, 2025 **What do you like best about Amplitude Web Experimentation?** The ability to run experiments independently of product deployment is particularly compelling. With feature experiments, team members often felt burdened by the need to participate in deployment processes, which had been a key concern. In contrast, web experiments—aside from an initial setup deployment—do not require additional deployments for each experiment, making them highly attractive. The editing interface is also intuitive, allowing team members without technical knowledge to conduct experiments easily, which has significantly improved the speed of experimentation. **What do you dislike about Amplitude Web Experimentation?** However, there are still several areas that need improvement. First, some users of web experiments, particularly those without development or HTML knowledge, face difficulties in accurately specifying HTML selectors. For example, a marketing team member once attempted to run a test to change the text within a button. Due to challenges in targeting the exact text element, they discovered that the button text appeared within the 'Edit raw' section of the 'Text' area and tried modifying it there. However, this approach resulted in the button failing to trigger the intended action when clicked, making it unsuitable for the experiment. Ultimately, the selector had to be manually edited. Since the marketing team member lacked HTML knowledge, this created a significant barrier. The issue was eventually resolved by an analyst with HTML expertise, who provided the appropriate selector for the targeted text element. It would be helpful to have clearer guidance on how to specify selectors. While class-based selectors are relatively easy to apply, selecting by ID is more difficult and could benefit from improvement. Additionally, functionalities beyond Display, Visibility, and Text are still difficult to use. For example, in the case of changing colors, it was unclear which specific color elements were being modified. A comprehensive guide or documentation on these features would be highly beneficial. **What problems is Amplitude Web Experimentation solving and how is that benefiting you?** You can understand how users react to different ways of introducing a feature. **Official Response from Tamara Kecman:** > Hi there, thank you so much for the detailed review! We’re glad to hear that running experiments without needing full deployments has been a game-changer for your team, and that the intuitive editor has helped speed up testing. That’s exactly the kind of impact we hope to have. We also really appreciate your candid feedback on selector challenges and advanced functionality. If you haven’t yet, we’d love for you to join the Amplitude Community! (https://bit.ly/cohort-community) We host monthly Experimentation Office Hours, and we have an active #experimentation channel where the product team engages directly. It’s a great place to ask questions like these and get more hands-on support/share feedback. Thanks again for helping us improve! ### 14. Easy to use and setup! **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Alaa S. | CTO, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 01, 2025 **What do you like best about Amplitude Web Experimentation?** The editor experience is simple and to the point. The setup is straight forward, given you already have your key funnel events tracked. Time-to-Experiment is very minimal (for very simple changes) **What do you dislike about Amplitude Web Experimentation?** The editor is still a little buggy. HTML editing is difficult to use, even for a developer (on Plus plan). **What problems is Amplitude Web Experimentation solving and how is that benefiting you?** A semi-no-code solution like this one reduces the need on expensive developer hours to implement simple A/B tests that are simply copy/style changes, or simple element manipulation. Marketing teams value their independence in testing landing pages in such a way greatly. ### 15. Normal review **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Furniture | Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 22, 2025 **What do you like best about Amplitude Web Experimentation?** I feel it is very easy to use and easy to implement. **What do you dislike about Amplitude Web Experimentation?** I don't find any drawbacks when using the web experimentation. **What problems is Amplitude Web Experimentation solving and how is that benefiting you?** Doing A/B Testing - [View Amplitude Web Experimentation pricing details and edition comparison](https://www.g2.com/products/amplitude-web-experimentation/reviews?section=pricing&secure%5Bexpires_at%5D=2026-05-13+09%3A28%3A04+-0500&secure%5Bsession_id%5D=d1b32be6-e817-4849-bacd-1c8a81d9e786&secure%5Btoken%5D=c473e414f1b8b0ab9114f3084c9616a8e1b249adff6e7ff262a8727b4d54eb2d&format=llm_user) ## Amplitude Web Experimentation Integrations - [Google Analytics](https://www.g2.com/products/google-analytics/reviews) - [Next.js](https://www.g2.com/products/next-js/reviews) ## Amplitude Web Experimentation Features **Platform Basics** - Templates - Exporting - Multi-user Access and Collaboration - Data Analytics **Platform Basics** - Dynamic Segmentation - Journey Optimization **Computing** - WYSIWYG - AI/Machine Learning - Little to No Coding **Platform Data** - Journey Reporting - Trends Reporting - Dashboards - Advanced Data Filtering **Experimental Design** - Multivariate testing capacities - Concurrent Testing - Mobile Testing **Agentic AI - Customer Journey Mapping** - Autonomous Task Execution **Platform Additional Functionality** - Integrations - Automated Alerts **Analytics** - Reporting and Analytics - Heatmaps **Agentic AI - Customer Journey Analytics** - Autonomous Task Execution - Cross-system Integration - Adaptive Learning - Proactive Assistance **Agentic AI - A/B Testing** - Autonomous Task Execution - Cross-system Integration - Adaptive Learning - Proactive Assistance ## Top Amplitude Web Experimentation Alternatives - [Agentforce Marketing (formerly Salesforce Marketing Cloud)](https://www.g2.com/products/agentforce-marketing-formerly-salesforce-marketing-cloud/reviews) - 4.0/5.0 (4,218 reviews) - [Netcore Customer Engagement Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/netcore-customer-engagement-platform/reviews) - 4.5/5.0 (555 reviews) - [MoEngage](https://www.g2.com/products/moengage/reviews) - 4.5/5.0 (508 reviews)