AS
Akash S.
User Experience Researcher
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Easy to use In-App Guides with Seamless Amplitude Analytics and Fast Insights"
4.5/5
What do you like best about Amplitude Guides and Surveys?

What I like most is how easy it is to build in-app guides and surveys without needing engineering support. The UI feels intuitive, the targeting options are flexible, and responses flow directly into Amplitude analytics, making it straightforward to measure engagement and feature adoption in one place. Performance has been reliable, and having AI available alongside product analytics helps us surface insights faster. We’ve been able to validate UX improvements and gather user feedback without bringing in additional tools, which has delivered solid ROI for us. Onboarding has been smooth overall, and customer support has been responsive whenever we’ve needed guidance. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Amplitude Guides and Surveys?

Nothing at the moment We’re planning to do a lot of experimentation with these, but so far they seem like good value for money. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Hospitality
IH
Verified User in Hospitality
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Easy, Quick Setup with Powerful Customization Options"
5/5
What do you like best about Amplitude Guides and Surveys?

The setup is very easy and quick and it also provides a lot of customize features such as css format, style, color, dimensions to adjust which is very useful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Amplitude Guides and Surveys?

I wish some settings could be edited in bulk to speed up the overall process. For example, we use Guides as product recommendation pop-ups for over 35 different products. However, every time I duplicate a Guide, I still have to define the product-specific URL to trigger the pop-up. It took me 1–2 hours to update the setup for all 35 Guides with the same copy-and-paste steps, which is quite annoying. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Akshaya B.
AB
Akshaya B.
Product Manager
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Easy Setup, Intuitive Performance Tracking"
4.5/5
What do you like best about Amplitude Guides and Surveys?

Its easy to setup and very intuitive. Performance and tracking is easy Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Amplitude Guides and Surveys?

Its skipped by users, im not sure what the usual % of conversions look like across the industry but I feels like its getting more and more skippable. Users are difficult to engage and need new things to capture attention Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Information Technology and Services
II
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Amplitude Guides & Surveys: Easy Setup, Seamless Targeting, and Big Dev Time Savings"
4.5/5
What do you like best about Amplitude Guides and Surveys?

Amplitude Guides and Surveys is an amazing, versatile feature that can save a lot of development time. The UX and UI are easy to understand and configure, and targeting users feels clear and seamless. You can even customize how the survey looks to match your own brand style, without needing help from the dev team.

Getting started is straightforward and clear from the beginning, and I haven’t run into any performance issues. The AI insights feature is also really cool, since it gives you a summary of how people interacted with your survey.

With just one survey, we save at least a week of development time (designing the survey with the FE, setting up DB endpoints, etc.), and we could launch the survey with just a product person. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Amplitude Guides and Surveys?

One thing I felt was missing was the ability to delay surveys so they would trigger on a specific event with a time delay. However, this was recently added as a feature, so for now I can’t think of anything else that’s missing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Chaitanya P.
CP
Chaitanya P.
Manager, Email Marketing
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Seamless Behavior-Based Guides and Surveys with Measurable Impact in Amplitude"
4/5
What do you like best about Amplitude Guides and Surveys?

The best part of Amplitude Guides and Surveys is how seamlessly it combines user engagement with feedback collection. Being able to launch personalized guides, surveys, and announcements based on user behavior makes it easier to deliver the right message at the right time, while also measuring the impact directly in Amplitude. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Amplitude Guides and Surveys?

I’m trying to figure out how to integrate this with other CRM tools so we can use additional channels (email, IAM, push) and achieve seamless campaign orchestration. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Marketing and Advertising
UM
Verified User in Marketing and Advertising
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Simple, but effective."
5/5
What do you like best about Amplitude Guides and Surveys?

Both guides and surveys are very intuitive to use, both functioning in almost an identical way, so you don't have to really learn how to use 2x new tools.

The interactivity between them is also great, being able to trigger one based on the other.

So far, the responses have also been very good and easy to understand and evaluate. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Amplitude Guides and Surveys?

Although you can have multiple themes (depending on the plan you have), the customisability is quite limited. I would like to be able to maybe make surveys a bit bigger, introduce more elements to make them engaging and exciting for users to want to complete. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Tamara Kecman of Amplitude Guides and Surveys

Thank you for sharing your thoughts! We love that Guides and Surveys is intuitive for you. That interplay between helping you gather valuable insights and supporting your users, is something that's really important to us. We appreciate your suggestions on customization; your feedback helps us identify where to enhance flexibility and creative options.

Verified User in Design
UD
Verified User in Design
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Behavior-Driven In-App Guides with Seamless Amplitude Integration"
4.5/5
What do you like best about Amplitude Guides and Surveys?

Here is a comprehensive review structured around my day-to-day experience using Amplitude Guides and Surveys for product design and user research.

Overall Review: Behavior-Driven Engagement

Amplitude Guides and Surveys (built on their acquisition of Command AI) fundamentally solves the biggest flaw of traditional adoption tools: the data silo. Instead of guessing who needs help or blasting invasive, generic pop-ups at random, it allows you to move seamlessly from behavioral analytics to contextually precise in-product intervention.

Here is how the platform performs across the specific evaluation categories:

UI / UX

The builder interface is clean, visual, and highly efficient. The WYSIWYG visual element selector is excellent—it allows you to attach pins, tooltips, or checklists directly to specific CSS elements without requiring engineering support.

From an end-user perspective, the real UX magic is the built-in "annoyance monitoring." The system explicitly tracks indicators of user frustration—like rapid dismissals or rage clicks. If a user quickly dismisses a modal, the platform flags it as friction, allowing you to fine-tune your targeting so you aren't interrupting natural user workflows.

Integrations

Because this is a native part of the Amplitude Digital Analytics Platform, it shares the exact same SDK and user identity system as your behavioral tracking. You do not need to build complex API pipelines or sync manual CSVs to target a user group.

The workflow benefit: You can target an onboarding guide or survey using the exact live behavioral cohorts you already use for product analysis (e.g., "Show this tooltip only to users who triggered Event A three times but have never completed Event B").

Performance

The lightweight Web and Mobile SDKs (which support iOS, Android, and React Native) initialize as a plugin directly alongside core analytics. It resolves targeting logic on the client side efficiently without causing layout shifts or rendering lag, which is critical for maintaining app performance and core web vitals.

Pricing / ROI

Unlike alternative digital adoption platforms (DAPs) that price based on the volume of guides or surveys created, Amplitude scales its pricing based on Monthly Tracked Users (MTUs). This model drastically improves ROI because it removes creative constraints—you can build, iterate, and A/B test an infinite number of highly targeted, small-scale micro-surveys and contextual flows without triggering a pricing penalty. The ROI is realized through immediate, measurable lifts in product adoption and significantly reduced engineering backlogs.

Support / Onboarding

The initial setup is exceptionally low-friction if you already use Amplitude; it is literally a matter of adding an engagement plugin line to your existing initialization code. The platform documentation is thorough, and the self-serve learning curve for non-technical product managers and designers to start shipping live guides is incredibly fast.

AI / Intelligence

The platform utilizes behavioral intelligence to predict user intent. Instead of static, linear onboarding tours that users instantly skip, you can deploy adaptive, automated flows. It intelligently manages the cadence of your nudges using cross-campaign priority logic and cooldowns. This ensures a user is never bombarded with back-to-back notifications, keeping the communication contextual, smart, and helpful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Amplitude Guides and Surveys?

While Amplitude Guides and Surveys is incredibly powerful due to its native data integration, it isn’t perfect. When you push the platform into complex, multi-state applications or highly customized design systems, you hit distinct limitations.

Here is what I find most frustrating or limited about the platform, broken down across the core evaluation pillars:

UI / UX & Customization

While the WYSIWYG editor makes simple styling easy, achieving pixel-perfect alignment with highly specialized design systems can be a massive headache.

The Constraint: The default styling controls for fonts, spacing, and button behaviors can feel restrictive. If your application uses highly unique UI patterns, custom states, or dark/light mode toggles, you frequently have to resort to writing custom CSS overrides inside the builder.

The Element Selector Flaw: The visual element selector relies heavily on stable CSS classes or IDs. If your application uses single-page application (SPA) frameworks with dynamically generated class names (like styled-components or Tailwind), the element selector can lose its anchor. This causes tooltips to misalign, clip off-screen, or fail to render entirely when a page updates.

Complex Multi-Page Flows (Performance & Logic)

The platform handles linear, single-page walkthroughs beautifully, but complex, branching user journeys across multiple URLs or deep paths can be fragile.

The Workflow Friction: If a user needs to complete Step 1 on a dashboard, navigate through a sidebar, open a slide-out drawer, and complete Step 2, the guide engine occasionally drops the sequence. Managing conditional branching (e.g., "If the user clicks X, show Guide B; if they click Y, skip to Step 5") requires intricate setup that quickly becomes messy to maintain.

Analytics Integration & Deep Reporting

Ironically, even though it sits inside a world-class analytics platform, the native reporting dashboards for the Guides and Surveys themselves can feel surprisingly basic.

The Unexpected Disappointment: The out-of-the-box charts give you high-level stats (views, completions, dismissals, text responses), but they lack depth. If you want to run complex funnel analysis on exactly where users drop off within a 5-step onboarding guide, or cross-reference survey text responses with specific granular user properties, you have to manually build custom charts in core Amplitude Analytics using the raw underlying engagement events. It forces an extra step that should be seamlessly integrated into the Guide UI.

AI & Intelligence Limitations

The prioritization logic and cooldowns prevent you from spamming users, but the "intelligence" is still fundamentally reactive rather than truly predictive.

The Reality: You still have to do the heavy lifting of manually defining the logic, setting up the triggers, and anticipating where users will struggle. The AI elements don't yet proactively suggest, "Hey, we notice 40% of users drop off at this specific UI form; you should automatically deploy a tooltip here." It still relies heavily on manual configuration. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Commercial Real Estate
UC
Verified User in Commercial Real Estate
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Challenging for Software with Complex URL Structures"
1.5/5
What do you like best about Amplitude Guides and Surveys?

I appreciate that Amplitude Guides and Surveys allows us to bring product announcements directly within the product. It keeps the announcements where our users actually are, providing effective communication directly in the product rather than through external means. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Amplitude Guides and Surveys?

Honestly, I do not like the platform. In terms of URL structure and being able to map to components, it is incredibly difficult for us to have multistep guides without breaking the whole product. It is nearly impossible for us to have multistep guides. We basically only use it for product announcements because the way that our product is structured, it is really hard to map to URLs because every single customer has a different URL. And individual elements on the page every customer has a unique setup. It's nearly impossible to map to elements because every single customer has different elements shown. And when I map it to an element, it often breaks the entire guide for customers who don't have that element, or those who do have that element but are lacking other ones. I find it hard to use and very limiting. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Amanda Brush of Amplitude Guides and Surveys

Multistep guides breaking because every customer has a different URL structure and different elements on the page is a real limitation, not just a rough edge. Targeting that has to flex per-customer like that is hard for any in-product guide tool, and it sounds like ours isn't holding up for your setup. If you're up for helping us improve, please send the specifics on how your URLs and elements vary to support.amplitude.com or your account team. That detail is exactly what helps our product team enhance targeting for cases like this.

Verified User in Information Technology and Services
UI
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Easy Setup and Solid Guides, but Limited Customization and Translation Control"
3/5
What do you like best about Amplitude Guides and Surveys?

It's easy to set up and is quite straightforward, also appreciate the different options for guides and surveys. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Amplitude Guides and Surveys?

In comparison to other tools that are able to offer in-app guides and surveys, Amplitude is quite limited here. Lacks advanced features like being able to add nice cover photos, moving them around. Also unable to manually translate while only being able to rely on AI translations without being able to edit it. For a global company, this is important as we have multiple customers from all over and if AI translations are wrong, then touche. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Chris J.
CJ
Chris J.
PMM
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Closes the Analytics-Action Loop Efficiently"
4/5
What do you like best about Amplitude Guides and Surveys?

I like how Amplitude Guides and Surveys lets me target specific cohorts with guides and surveys, which helps in pinpointing where there's a drop between steps and getting instant qualitative feedback. I appreciate the speed of deploying new guides or surveys without needing coding, which has streamlined our ability to run various experiments smoothly, eliminating the need for dev tickets and release cycles. I also enjoy how the theming matches our product's type, spacing, and components, ensuring users aren't disrupted in their experience. This consistency makes guides and surveys that integrate with our design more likely to be read and interacted with. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Amplitude Guides and Surveys?

1. The insights on individual guides could be deeper. I can't easily see things like how long someone actually engaged with a multi-step guide, where they dropped off, and more. 2. Mobile is still behind web. 3. Targeting can be more nuanced with its conditions. 4. The learning curve on the more advanced setup is real - especially for multi-step flows. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.