# Top 10 Onshape Alternatives & Competitors
**Average Rating:** 4.7/5
**Total Number of Reviews:** 725
Onshape is not the only option for Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD) Software. Explore other competing options and alternatives. Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD) Software is a widely used technology, and many people are seeking time saving, easy to use software solutions with cad models and bom visualization. Other important factors to consider when researching alternatives to Onshape include modeling tools. The best overall Onshape alternative is SOLIDWORKS. Other similar apps like Onshape are Autodesk Fusion, Designcenter Solid Edge, Inventor, and SketchUp. Onshape alternatives can be found in [Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD) Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/mechanical-computer-aided-design-mcad) but may also be in [General-Purpose CAD Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/general-purpose-cad) or [Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM) Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/computer-aided-manufacturing-cam).


## Best Paid & Free Alternatives to Onshape
  - [SOLIDWORKS](https://www.g2.com/products/solidworks/reviews)
  - [Autodesk Fusion](https://www.g2.com/products/autodesk-fusion/reviews)
  - [Designcenter Solid Edge](https://www.g2.com/products/designcenter-solid-edge/reviews)
  - [Inventor](https://www.g2.com/products/inventor/reviews)
  - [SketchUp](https://www.g2.com/products/sketchup/reviews)
  - [Designcenter](https://www.g2.com/products/designcenter/reviews)
  - [AutoCAD](https://www.g2.com/products/autocad/reviews)
  - [Altium Develop](https://www.g2.com/products/altium-develop/reviews)
  - [CATIA](https://www.g2.com/products/catia/reviews)
  - [Rhinoceros](https://www.g2.com/products/rhinoceros/reviews)

## Top 10 Alternatives to Onshape Recently Reviewed By G2 Community
Browse options below. Based on reviewer data, you can see how Onshape stacks up to the competition, check reviews from current & previous users in industries like Mechanical or Industrial Engineering, Machinery, and Consumer Electronics, and find the best product for your business.


  ### 1. [SOLIDWORKS](https://www.g2.com/products/solidworks/reviews)
By Dassault Systemes
**Average Rating:** 4.5/5
**Total Reviews:** 646
SOLIDWORKS offers complete 3D software tools that let you create, simulate, publish, and manage your data. SOLIDWORKS products are easy to learn and use, and help you design products better.


Reviewers say compared to Onshape, SOLIDWORKS is:
- Slower to reach roi
- More expensive
- Better at meeting requirements
Categories in common with Onshape: [Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)](https://www.g2.com/categories/mechanical-computer-aided-design-mcad), [CAD Viewers](https://www.g2.com/categories/cad-viewers), [General-Purpose CAD](https://www.g2.com/categories/general-purpose-cad), [Simulation & CAE](https://www.g2.com/categories/simulation-cae), [Sketching](https://www.g2.com/categories/sketching)

**Compare:** [Onshape vs SOLIDWORKS](https://www.g2.com/compare/onshape-vs-solidworks)
**Compare SOLIDWORKS with other alternatives:**
- [SOLIDWORKS vs Autodesk Fusion](https://www.g2.com/compare/autodesk-fusion-vs-solidworks)
- [SOLIDWORKS vs Designcenter Solid Edge](https://www.g2.com/compare/designcenter-solid-edge-vs-solidworks)
- [SOLIDWORKS vs Inventor](https://www.g2.com/compare/inventor-vs-solidworks)
- [SOLIDWORKS vs SketchUp](https://www.g2.com/compare/solidworks-vs-sketchup)
- [SOLIDWORKS vs Designcenter](https://www.g2.com/compare/designcenter-vs-solidworks)
- [SOLIDWORKS vs AutoCAD](https://www.g2.com/compare/autocad-vs-solidworks)
- [SOLIDWORKS vs Altium Develop](https://www.g2.com/compare/altium-develop-vs-solidworks)
- [SOLIDWORKS vs CATIA](https://www.g2.com/compare/catia-vs-solidworks)
- [SOLIDWORKS vs Rhinoceros](https://www.g2.com/compare/rhinoceros-vs-solidworks)

  ### 2. [Autodesk Fusion](https://www.g2.com/products/autodesk-fusion/reviews)
By Autodesk
**Average Rating:** 4.5/5
**Total Reviews:** 520
Autodesk Fusion is a comprehensive cloud software platform that integrates various tools for 3D design, manufacturing, electronics, simulation, and generative design. It serves as a collaborative, cloud-enabled CAD (Computer-Aided Design), CAM (Computer-Aided Manufacturing), CAE (Computer-Aided Engineering), and PCB (Printed Circuit Board) software.


Reviewers say compared to Onshape, Autodesk Fusion is:
- Slower to reach roi
- Better at meeting requirements
Categories in common with Onshape: [Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)](https://www.g2.com/categories/mechanical-computer-aided-design-mcad), [CAD Viewers](https://www.g2.com/categories/cad-viewers), [General-Purpose CAD](https://www.g2.com/categories/general-purpose-cad), [Simulation & CAE](https://www.g2.com/categories/simulation-cae), [Sketching](https://www.g2.com/categories/sketching)

**Compare:** [Onshape vs Autodesk Fusion](https://www.g2.com/compare/autodesk-fusion-vs-onshape)
**Compare Autodesk Fusion with other alternatives:**
- [Autodesk Fusion vs SOLIDWORKS](https://www.g2.com/compare/autodesk-fusion-vs-solidworks)
- [Autodesk Fusion vs Designcenter Solid Edge](https://www.g2.com/compare/autodesk-fusion-vs-designcenter-solid-edge)
- [Autodesk Fusion vs Inventor](https://www.g2.com/compare/autodesk-fusion-vs-inventor)
- [Autodesk Fusion vs SketchUp](https://www.g2.com/compare/autodesk-fusion-vs-sketchup)
- [Autodesk Fusion vs Designcenter](https://www.g2.com/compare/autodesk-fusion-vs-designcenter)
- [Autodesk Fusion vs AutoCAD](https://www.g2.com/compare/autocad-vs-autodesk-fusion)
- [Autodesk Fusion vs Altium Develop](https://www.g2.com/compare/altium-develop-vs-autodesk-fusion)
- [Autodesk Fusion vs CATIA](https://www.g2.com/compare/autodesk-fusion-vs-catia)
- [Autodesk Fusion vs Rhinoceros](https://www.g2.com/compare/autodesk-fusion-vs-rhinoceros)

  ### 3. [Designcenter Solid Edge](https://www.g2.com/products/designcenter-solid-edge/reviews)
By Siemens Digital Industries Software
**Average Rating:** 4.2/5
**Total Reviews:** 638
Solid Edge is a portfolio of affordable, easy-to-use software solutions for product development — 3D design, simulation, manufacturing, data management, cloud collaboration, and more. Solid Edge combines the speed and simplicity of direct modeling with the flexibility and control of parametric design – made possible with synchronous technology.


Reviewers say compared to Onshape, Designcenter Solid Edge is:
- Slower to reach roi
- More expensive
Categories in common with Onshape: [Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)](https://www.g2.com/categories/mechanical-computer-aided-design-mcad), [General-Purpose CAD](https://www.g2.com/categories/general-purpose-cad), [Simulation & CAE](https://www.g2.com/categories/simulation-cae), [Additive Manufacturing](https://www.g2.com/categories/additive-manufacturing)

**Compare:** [Onshape vs Designcenter Solid Edge](https://www.g2.com/compare/designcenter-solid-edge-vs-onshape)
**Compare Designcenter Solid Edge with other alternatives:**
- [Designcenter Solid Edge vs SOLIDWORKS](https://www.g2.com/compare/designcenter-solid-edge-vs-solidworks)
- [Designcenter Solid Edge vs Autodesk Fusion](https://www.g2.com/compare/autodesk-fusion-vs-designcenter-solid-edge)
- [Designcenter Solid Edge vs Inventor](https://www.g2.com/compare/designcenter-solid-edge-vs-inventor)
- [Designcenter Solid Edge vs SketchUp](https://www.g2.com/compare/designcenter-solid-edge-vs-sketchup)
- [Designcenter Solid Edge vs Designcenter](https://www.g2.com/compare/designcenter-vs-designcenter-solid-edge)
- [Designcenter Solid Edge vs AutoCAD](https://www.g2.com/compare/autocad-vs-designcenter-solid-edge)
- [Designcenter Solid Edge vs Altium Develop](https://www.g2.com/compare/altium-develop-vs-designcenter-solid-edge)
- [Designcenter Solid Edge vs CATIA](https://www.g2.com/compare/catia-vs-designcenter-solid-edge)
- [Designcenter Solid Edge vs Rhinoceros](https://www.g2.com/compare/designcenter-solid-edge-vs-rhinoceros)

  ### 4. [Inventor](https://www.g2.com/products/inventor/reviews)
By Autodesk
**Average Rating:** 4.4/5
**Total Reviews:** 440
Inventor® 3D CAD software offers an easy-to-use set of tools for 3D mechanical design, documentation, and product simulation.


Reviewers say compared to Onshape, Inventor is:
- Slower to reach roi
- More expensive
- Better at meeting requirements
Categories in common with Onshape: [Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)](https://www.g2.com/categories/mechanical-computer-aided-design-mcad), [General-Purpose CAD](https://www.g2.com/categories/general-purpose-cad), [Simulation & CAE](https://www.g2.com/categories/simulation-cae)

**Compare:** [Onshape vs Inventor](https://www.g2.com/compare/inventor-vs-onshape)
**Compare Inventor with other alternatives:**
- [Inventor vs SOLIDWORKS](https://www.g2.com/compare/inventor-vs-solidworks)
- [Inventor vs Autodesk Fusion](https://www.g2.com/compare/autodesk-fusion-vs-inventor)
- [Inventor vs Designcenter Solid Edge](https://www.g2.com/compare/designcenter-solid-edge-vs-inventor)
- [Inventor vs SketchUp](https://www.g2.com/compare/inventor-vs-sketchup)
- [Inventor vs Designcenter](https://www.g2.com/compare/designcenter-vs-inventor)
- [Inventor vs AutoCAD](https://www.g2.com/compare/autocad-vs-inventor)
- [Inventor vs Altium Develop](https://www.g2.com/compare/altium-develop-vs-inventor)
- [Inventor vs CATIA](https://www.g2.com/compare/catia-vs-inventor)
- [Inventor vs Rhinoceros](https://www.g2.com/compare/inventor-vs-rhinoceros)

  ### 5. [SketchUp](https://www.g2.com/products/sketchup/reviews)
By Trimble
**Average Rating:** 4.5/5
**Total Reviews:** 1,327
SketchUp is intuitive, powerful 3D modeling software built for professionals and creatives of all kinds.


Reviewers say compared to Onshape, SketchUp is:
- Slower to reach roi
- More expensive
- Better at meeting requirements
Categories in common with Onshape: [General-Purpose CAD](https://www.g2.com/categories/general-purpose-cad), [Sketching](https://www.g2.com/categories/sketching)

**Compare:** [Onshape vs SketchUp](https://www.g2.com/compare/onshape-vs-sketchup)
**Compare SketchUp with other alternatives:**
- [SketchUp vs SOLIDWORKS](https://www.g2.com/compare/solidworks-vs-sketchup)
- [SketchUp vs Autodesk Fusion](https://www.g2.com/compare/autodesk-fusion-vs-sketchup)
- [SketchUp vs Designcenter Solid Edge](https://www.g2.com/compare/designcenter-solid-edge-vs-sketchup)
- [SketchUp vs Inventor](https://www.g2.com/compare/inventor-vs-sketchup)
- [SketchUp vs Designcenter](https://www.g2.com/compare/designcenter-vs-sketchup)
- [SketchUp vs AutoCAD](https://www.g2.com/compare/autocad-vs-sketchup)
- [SketchUp vs Altium Develop](https://www.g2.com/compare/altium-develop-vs-sketchup)
- [SketchUp vs CATIA](https://www.g2.com/compare/catia-vs-sketchup)
- [SketchUp vs Rhinoceros](https://www.g2.com/compare/rhinoceros-vs-sketchup)

  ### 6. [Designcenter](https://www.g2.com/products/designcenter/reviews)
By Siemens Digital Industries Software
**Average Rating:** 4.4/5
**Total Reviews:** 670
Designcenter is an integrated product design solution that streamlines and accelerates the product development process for engineers who need to deliver innovative products in a collaborative environment.


Reviewers say compared to Onshape, Designcenter is:
- More expensive
- Slower to reach roi
- Better at meeting requirements
Categories in common with Onshape: [Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)](https://www.g2.com/categories/mechanical-computer-aided-design-mcad), [Additive Manufacturing](https://www.g2.com/categories/additive-manufacturing)

**Compare:** [Onshape vs Designcenter](https://www.g2.com/compare/designcenter-vs-onshape)
**Compare Designcenter with other alternatives:**
- [Designcenter vs SOLIDWORKS](https://www.g2.com/compare/designcenter-vs-solidworks)
- [Designcenter vs Autodesk Fusion](https://www.g2.com/compare/autodesk-fusion-vs-designcenter)
- [Designcenter vs Designcenter Solid Edge](https://www.g2.com/compare/designcenter-vs-designcenter-solid-edge)
- [Designcenter vs Inventor](https://www.g2.com/compare/designcenter-vs-inventor)
- [Designcenter vs SketchUp](https://www.g2.com/compare/designcenter-vs-sketchup)
- [Designcenter vs AutoCAD](https://www.g2.com/compare/autocad-vs-designcenter)
- [Designcenter vs Altium Develop](https://www.g2.com/compare/altium-develop-vs-designcenter)
- [Designcenter vs CATIA](https://www.g2.com/compare/catia-vs-designcenter)
- [Designcenter vs Rhinoceros](https://www.g2.com/compare/designcenter-vs-rhinoceros)

  ### 7. [AutoCAD](https://www.g2.com/products/autocad/reviews)
By Autodesk
**Average Rating:** 4.4/5
**Total Reviews:** 1,940
2D and 3D CAD design software tools.


Reviewers say compared to Onshape, AutoCAD is:
- Slower to reach roi
- More expensive
- Better at meeting requirements
Categories in common with Onshape: [Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)](https://www.g2.com/categories/mechanical-computer-aided-design-mcad), [General-Purpose CAD](https://www.g2.com/categories/general-purpose-cad)

**Compare:** [Onshape vs AutoCAD](https://www.g2.com/compare/autocad-vs-onshape)
**Compare AutoCAD with other alternatives:**
- [AutoCAD vs SOLIDWORKS](https://www.g2.com/compare/autocad-vs-solidworks)
- [AutoCAD vs Autodesk Fusion](https://www.g2.com/compare/autocad-vs-autodesk-fusion)
- [AutoCAD vs Designcenter Solid Edge](https://www.g2.com/compare/autocad-vs-designcenter-solid-edge)
- [AutoCAD vs Inventor](https://www.g2.com/compare/autocad-vs-inventor)
- [AutoCAD vs SketchUp](https://www.g2.com/compare/autocad-vs-sketchup)
- [AutoCAD vs Designcenter](https://www.g2.com/compare/autocad-vs-designcenter)
- [AutoCAD vs Altium Develop](https://www.g2.com/compare/altium-develop-vs-autocad)
- [AutoCAD vs CATIA](https://www.g2.com/compare/autocad-vs-catia)
- [AutoCAD vs Rhinoceros](https://www.g2.com/compare/autocad-vs-rhinoceros)

  ### 8. [Altium Develop](https://www.g2.com/products/altium-develop/reviews)
By Altium
**Average Rating:** 4.5/5
**Total Reviews:** 1,050
Altium Develop empowers teams to streamline and accelerate product development by connecting design, engineering, and collaboration tools in one unified platform — keeping every stage of innovation aligned and accessible.


Reviewers say compared to Onshape, Altium Develop is:
- Slower to reach roi
- More expensive
- Better at meeting requirements
Categories in common with Onshape: [Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)](https://www.g2.com/categories/mechanical-computer-aided-design-mcad), [Product Data Management (PDM)](https://www.g2.com/categories/product-data-management-pdm), [General-Purpose CAD](https://www.g2.com/categories/general-purpose-cad), [PCB Design](https://www.g2.com/categories/pcb-design)

**Compare:** [Onshape vs Altium Develop](https://www.g2.com/compare/altium-develop-vs-onshape)
**Compare Altium Develop with other alternatives:**
- [Altium Develop vs SOLIDWORKS](https://www.g2.com/compare/altium-develop-vs-solidworks)
- [Altium Develop vs Autodesk Fusion](https://www.g2.com/compare/altium-develop-vs-autodesk-fusion)
- [Altium Develop vs Designcenter Solid Edge](https://www.g2.com/compare/altium-develop-vs-designcenter-solid-edge)
- [Altium Develop vs Inventor](https://www.g2.com/compare/altium-develop-vs-inventor)
- [Altium Develop vs SketchUp](https://www.g2.com/compare/altium-develop-vs-sketchup)
- [Altium Develop vs Designcenter](https://www.g2.com/compare/altium-develop-vs-designcenter)
- [Altium Develop vs AutoCAD](https://www.g2.com/compare/altium-develop-vs-autocad)
- [Altium Develop vs CATIA](https://www.g2.com/compare/altium-develop-vs-catia)
- [Altium Develop vs Rhinoceros](https://www.g2.com/compare/altium-develop-vs-rhinoceros)

  ### 9. [CATIA](https://www.g2.com/products/catia/reviews)
By Dassault Systemes
**Average Rating:** 4.2/5
**Total Reviews:** 255
CATIA is a comprehensive software suite developed by Dassault Systèmes, designed to facilitate the entire product development process from conceptualization to manufacturing. It integrates advanced 3D modeling, simulation, and collaboration tools, enabling users to design, analyze, and manage complex products and systems efficiently. CATIA's intuitive interface and robust capabilities support a wide range of industries, including aerospace, automotive, construction, and consumer goods, fostering innovation and enhancing product quality. Key Features and Functionality: - 3D Modeling and Design: Offers parametric and non-parametric modeling tools for creating precise and complex geometries, accommodating both mechanical and surface design needs. - Simulation and Analysis: Provides integrated simulation capabilities to test and validate product performance under real-world conditions, reducing the need for physical prototypes. - Systems Engineering: Supports model-based systems engineering (MBSE) to manage complex product architectures, ensuring consistency across mechanical, electrical, and software components. - Collaboration Tools: Facilitates real-time collaboration among multidisciplinary teams through a unified platform, enhancing communication and decision-making processes. - Knowledge Management: Enables the capture and reuse of design knowledge and best practices, promoting standardization and efficiency across projects. Primary Value and User Solutions: CATIA addresses the challenges of modern product development by providing a unified environment that integrates design, simulation, and collaboration tools. This integration allows organizations to accelerate innovation, improve product quality, and reduce time-to-market. By supporting a wide range of disciplines and industries, CATIA helps users manage complex product lifecycles, ensure design accuracy, and foster collaboration across global teams, ultimately leading to more sustainable and impactful customer experiences.


Reviewers say compared to Onshape, CATIA is:
- More expensive
- Better at meeting requirements
Categories in common with Onshape: [Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)](https://www.g2.com/categories/mechanical-computer-aided-design-mcad), [Simulation & CAE](https://www.g2.com/categories/simulation-cae)

**Compare:** [Onshape vs CATIA](https://www.g2.com/compare/catia-vs-onshape)
**Compare CATIA with other alternatives:**
- [CATIA vs SOLIDWORKS](https://www.g2.com/compare/catia-vs-solidworks)
- [CATIA vs Autodesk Fusion](https://www.g2.com/compare/autodesk-fusion-vs-catia)
- [CATIA vs Designcenter Solid Edge](https://www.g2.com/compare/catia-vs-designcenter-solid-edge)
- [CATIA vs Inventor](https://www.g2.com/compare/catia-vs-inventor)
- [CATIA vs SketchUp](https://www.g2.com/compare/catia-vs-sketchup)
- [CATIA vs Designcenter](https://www.g2.com/compare/catia-vs-designcenter)
- [CATIA vs AutoCAD](https://www.g2.com/compare/autocad-vs-catia)
- [CATIA vs Altium Develop](https://www.g2.com/compare/altium-develop-vs-catia)
- [CATIA vs Rhinoceros](https://www.g2.com/compare/catia-vs-rhinoceros)

  ### 10. [Rhinoceros](https://www.g2.com/products/rhinoceros/reviews)
By McNeel
**Average Rating:** 4.4/5
**Total Reviews:** 192
Rhinoceros, commonly known as Rhino, is a 3D computer-aided design (CAD) application developed by Robert McNeel & Associates. It specializes in free-form NURBS (Non-Uniform Rational B-Splines) modeling, enabling users to create, edit, analyze, document, render, animate, and translate complex 3D geometries with precision. Widely adopted across various industries—including architecture, industrial design, naval engineering, jewelry design, and multimedia—Rhino offers a comprehensive suite of tools for professionals seeking accuracy and flexibility in their design processes. Key Features and Functionality: - Comprehensive Modeling Tools: Rhino provides an extensive array of tools for creating and editing points, curves, surfaces, solids, meshes, and subdivision geometry (SubD). Users can generate complex shapes through operations like lofting, sweeping, and blending, facilitating intricate design work. - Precision and Accuracy: The software ensures high levels of accuracy, essential for designing, prototyping, engineering, and manufacturing applications ranging from intricate jewelry pieces to large-scale architectural projects. - Extensive Compatibility: Rhino supports over 30 CAD file formats, including DWG/DXF, IGES, STEP, and STL, allowing seamless integration with other design, drafting, CAM, engineering, analysis, rendering, animation, and illustration software. - Advanced Rendering and Presentation: With built-in rendering capabilities and support for various third-party rendering plugins, Rhino enables users to produce high-quality visualizations and presentations of their designs. - Grasshopper Integration: The inclusion of Grasshopper, a visual programming language, allows for parametric and algorithmic design, enabling users to create generative forms and automate complex modeling tasks without prior programming knowledge. - Customization and Extensibility: Rhino's open architecture and SDK facilitate customization of the interface and the creation of custom commands and menus. Additionally, a vast ecosystem of plugins extends its functionality to cater to specific industry needs. Primary Value and User Solutions: Rhino's primary value lies in its ability to provide an affordable yet powerful 3D modeling solution that balances flexibility, precision, and user-friendliness. It addresses the needs of professionals who require accurate and complex modeling capabilities without the steep learning curve or high costs associated with other high-end CAD software. By supporting a wide range of file formats and offering extensive customization options, Rhino ensures seamless workflow integration and adaptability to various project requirements. Its integration with Grasshopper further empowers users to explore parametric design and computational modeling, fostering innovation and efficiency in the design process.


Reviewers say compared to Onshape, Rhinoceros is:
- Slower to reach roi
- More expensive
- Better at meeting requirements
Categories in common with Onshape: [Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)](https://www.g2.com/categories/mechanical-computer-aided-design-mcad), [General-Purpose CAD](https://www.g2.com/categories/general-purpose-cad)

**Compare:** [Onshape vs Rhinoceros](https://www.g2.com/compare/onshape-vs-rhinoceros)
**Compare Rhinoceros with other alternatives:**
- [Rhinoceros vs SOLIDWORKS](https://www.g2.com/compare/rhinoceros-vs-solidworks)
- [Rhinoceros vs Autodesk Fusion](https://www.g2.com/compare/autodesk-fusion-vs-rhinoceros)
- [Rhinoceros vs Designcenter Solid Edge](https://www.g2.com/compare/designcenter-solid-edge-vs-rhinoceros)
- [Rhinoceros vs Inventor](https://www.g2.com/compare/inventor-vs-rhinoceros)
- [Rhinoceros vs SketchUp](https://www.g2.com/compare/rhinoceros-vs-sketchup)
- [Rhinoceros vs Designcenter](https://www.g2.com/compare/designcenter-vs-rhinoceros)
- [Rhinoceros vs AutoCAD](https://www.g2.com/compare/autocad-vs-rhinoceros)
- [Rhinoceros vs Altium Develop](https://www.g2.com/compare/altium-develop-vs-rhinoceros)
- [Rhinoceros vs CATIA](https://www.g2.com/compare/catia-vs-rhinoceros)


---
## Onshape Alternatives FAQs

### How does Onshape compare to SOLIDWORKS?

According to G2 data, [Onshape](https://www.g2.com/products/onshape/reviews) holds a higher average rating of 4.7/5 across 695 reviews compared to [SOLIDWORKS](https://www.g2.com/products/solidworks/reviews) with 4.5/5 from 643 reviews. Onshape excels in ease of setup (9.3 vs 8.3) and ease of administration (9.1 vs 8.0), showing a 1.0 and 1.1 point lead respectively. It also leads in support quality (9.3 vs 8.2) and ease of doing business (9.3 vs 8.3) by over 1 point each. Conversely, SOLIDWORKS scores higher in meeting requirements (8.8 vs 8.4) and usability (8.6 vs 9.0), with Onshape leading usability by 0.4 points. User sentiment highlights Onshape's strengths in ease of use (28 mentions), collaboration (22), online accessibility (21), version control (13), and cloud services (14). Its cloud-native architecture enables real-time collaboration, seamless sharing, and access from any device without installation. SOLIDWORKS users praise its comprehensive feature set (28 mentions), 3D modeling capabilities (25), simulation tools (15), and strong community support. It is recognized for robust parametric design, simulation, and integration with manufacturing workflows. Overall, Onshape offers superior cloud-based collaboration, ease of administration, and accessibility, while SOLIDWORKS provides a more mature feature set and simulation capabilities favored in traditional engineering environments.



### What are the best alternatives to Onshape?

The best alternatives to Onshape include [SOLIDWORKS](https://www.g2.com/products/solidworks/reviews) (4.5/5 stars, 643 reviews), [Autodesk Fusion](https://www.g2.com/products/autodesk-fusion/reviews) (4.5/5 stars, 519 reviews), and [Designcenter Solid Edge](https://www.g2.com/products/designcenter-solid-edge/reviews) (4.3/5 stars, 606 reviews). These alternatives offer robust 3D modeling, simulation, and collaboration features, with strong user satisfaction and extensive capabilities for complex mechanical design.



### What features do alternatives offer that Onshape does not?

Onshape lacks advanced 3D sketching, surface editing tools like patching and sculpting, integrated animation capabilities, and a fully developed drawing environment with features such as auto dimensioning, break and section views in the same drawing, and comprehensive GD&T support. It also does not support offline access and has limited CAM and circuit design functionalities compared to some alternatives.



### Which Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD) tools do reviewers recommend instead of Onshape?

Reviewers recommend [SOLIDWORKS](https://www.g2.com/products/solidworks/reviews) for its intuitive parametric modeling, extensive simulation tools, and strong industry adoption, making it suitable for both beginners and professionals. [Autodesk Fusion](https://www.g2.com/products/autodesk-fusion/reviews) is favored for its all-in-one cloud platform integrating CAD, CAM, CAE, and PCB design, with excellent collaboration and ease of use. [Designcenter Solid Edge](https://www.g2.com/products/designcenter-solid-edge/reviews) is praised for its synchronous technology blending direct and parametric modeling, AI-powered features, and efficient handling of large assemblies. These tools are recommended for users seeking comprehensive MCAD solutions with advanced features beyond Onshape's current offerings.



### Why do users choose SOLIDWORKS over Onshape?

Users choose [SOLIDWORKS](https://www.g2.com/products/solidworks/reviews) over Onshape primarily for its comprehensive and mature feature set, especially in advanced 3D modeling, simulation, and parametric design. With 28 mentions praising its features and 15 highlighting simulation tools, SOLIDWORKS is favored for complex engineering tasks requiring detailed analysis and manufacturing integration. SOLIDWORKS is widely regarded as an industry standard with a large user community and extensive tutorials, making it attractive for professionals seeking robust CAD capabilities. Its strong integration with other CAD and CAM tools and support for complex assemblies further solidify its appeal. Despite higher system requirements and licensing costs, users appreciate SOLIDWORKS for its precision, extensive toolset, and reliability in professional settings. The software’s ability to handle detailed surface modeling, sheet metal design, and motion analysis are key reasons users prefer it. Additionally, some users find SOLIDWORKS’ UI and workflows more familiar and intuitive for traditional CAD practices, which influences their choice over Onshape’s cloud-based, browser-dependent platform.




## Explore Articles
- [Insight Assurance vs A-LIGN: which IT compliance services provider deploys faster with less need for external consultants?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/insight-assurance-vs-a-lign-which-it-compliance-services-provider-deploys-faster-with-less-need-for-external-consultants)
- [Is a dedicated client-side protection platform worth it for a mid-size retail site?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/is-a-dedicated-client-side-protection-platform-worth-it-for-a-mid-size-retail-site)
- [What are the most trusted library management systems by library operations managers based on user reviews?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-are-the-most-trusted-library-management-systems-by-library-operations-managers-based-on-user-reviews)
- [Which FSM platforms work well for teams that deal with complex multi-step jobs but do not have dedicated IT staff on hand?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/which-fsm-platforms-work-well-for-teams-that-deal-with-complex-multi-step-jobs-but-do-not-have-dedicated-it-staff-on-hand)
- [NEOGOV vs Watermark Faculty Success: which is better for faculty tracking and accreditation management?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/neogov-vs-watermark-faculty-success-which-is-better-for-faculty-tracking-and-accreditation-management)
- [What key capabilities should teams look for in resilience-focused orchestration platforms for mission-critical operations?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-key-capabilities-should-teams-look-for-in-resilience-focused-orchestration-platforms-for-mission-critical-operations)

## Spotlight Categories
- [Job Search Sites](https://www.g2.com/categories/job-search-sites)
- [Operational Risk Management Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/operational-risk-management)
- [SEO Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/seo-tools)