So, what I like most is the integration of Altair SimSolid, because it allows me to use it under a user interface that I already know. It is also relatively easy to teach other designers, as they only need to know one interface. I also like that it is not necessary to mesh. That is actually the main reason. The results, as far as I have seen, are usable. In most cases, we have had good experiences for a quick and rough assessment. It is also important to me that one can quickly and intuitively get into the interface. This has been well achieved with Altair SimSolid. Additionally, I like that I can switch between the OptiStruct interface and the solver to quickly check if it works the same way with a mesh-based solver as it does with Altair SimSolid. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The biggest problem is identifying the differences between a network-based solver and a non-network-based solver. Especially in special cases, it can happen that Altair SimSolid provides results that do not meet expectations. It would be important to explain these differences and bring Altair SimSolid closer to the correct solution, even if this is a lengthy process. I have not seen concrete examples in my daily life, but there have been academic papers on the subject that were sent to me. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Hello, We appreciate your feedback on the differences between network-based and non-network-based solvers. We are continuously working to address these differences and provide clearer explanations to ensure that Simcenter SimSolid meets your expectations. Thank you for bringing this to our attention.
