It allows me to create great content and to scale the output. Once the workflow is ready to go you can apply it to hundreds of pages in minutes! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don't think it's necessary to go towards the AI prompt tracking tool path. There are other tools doing this, and better than them. I think they should focus on the workflows and how to keep improving them, this is where they have a competitive advantage Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

AirOps helped us develop stronger strategies and produce content at a high scale.

It also handles much of the heavy lifting around AEO/GEO. It helps you build a repeatable system, and you can bring your own workflow through the co-pilot. You focus on the strategy, and it sets up a workflow that’s ready to execute on your behalf...consistently and at scale Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Not much to add. It’s just that if you don’t know how to run a workflow properly, you might hit your task limits very quickly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The ability to create recurring tasks for items and lists that would grow our backlog. Also the ability for the workflow to loop and refresh its knowledge base with feedback Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The learning curve, but once you get past it. You can really take off and scale workflows. Just need to start small and build from there. I also dont like how tests take up credits, they should be at least minimum small credits Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Customizable AI prmpts, easy to understand UX without technical knowledge Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The price feels high relative to how quickly usage can scale, especially when running larger or more experimental workflows. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

AirOps does a great job of bridging strategy and execution. It’s not just about generating content faster — it’s about building repeatable, scalable systems for content creation, refresh, and optimization that still leave room for human judgment.

The workflows and grids make it easy to turn subject-matter expertise and real business moments (like webinars or product launches) into SEO- and AEO-ready content, social posts, and demand-gen assets without starting from scratch each time. It’s especially strong for teams that care about quality, consistency, and long-term discoverability rather than one-off outputs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The learning curve can feel steep at first, especially for teams new to thinking about content as systems rather than individual assets. To get the most value, you need to invest time upfront in experimenting with workflows and grids — it’s not an instant “plug-and-play” tool.

That said, once you make that investment, the payoff is significant, and the structure actually becomes a strength rather than a limitation. They also have a fantastic certification and academy that I would encourage anyone using AirOps take part in. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

AirOps lets me build systems instead of chasing individual prompts. Most AI tools help you write faster; AirOps helps you produce smarter by turning SEO/AEO into repeatable workflows you can scale across dozens or hundreds of keywords.

The free trial is also a huge plus; you can actually test the platform properly before committing. You understand the value once you use it.

Another thing I really appreciate is the Content Engine course. It teaches you how to think like a Content Engineer, with simple, practical lessons that show you how to build real workflows.

The Brand Kit + Knowledge Base setup feels like having your own style content system. It keeps everything consistent and factual. It’s a small thing that makes a massive difference in quality.

I love Power Agents because they save me hours of work while I learn! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There’s a learning curve. Not huge, but you do need to shift your mindset. The price is not clear. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

AirOps helps us turn manual SEO and competitive research into repeatable workflows. We use it for structured briefs and multi-step analysis, which improves consistency and reduces rework across projects. It’s strong when you need systemized outputs, not just one-off AI drafts. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

To get real value, you need clear inputs and well-designed workflows. It’s powerful, but not a plug-and-play content generator. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The flexibility this platform offers to build custom content workflows without coding experience and without in-depth knowledge of API integrations is what sets it apart from other similar tools in this space. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The brand settings could do with a bit of a facelift but this is just me searching for something that could potentially be improved rather than something I genuinely dislike. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

AirOps makes it so much easier to leverage AI for content creation. Instead of manually repeating the same prompts into different AI tools, endless copy and pasting, and wildly different outputs each time, I'm able to construct a workflow that delivers consistent results tailored to my needs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

AirOps is pricey. If you have the budget, it's totally worth the investment, but I know that most smaller teams might not be able to afford it, which is a bummer. We'd love to use it even more than we are now, but are limited because of budget. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It combine AI visibility with workflow actions. Sounds promising but.. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The tool sounds very promising but is simply selling a dream. The workflow builder is so unusable and it is taking me hours to figure out something simple.

I just need to configure 3 steps in a workflow and it took me a day to figure things out. Their AI assistant is not helpful. The support is slow and the sales people are not helpful at all.

Overall, the tool's UI/UX is so bad and buggy they make it hard for you to test out the platform so that you would need to pay more to hire their implementation team. This is super unacceptable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.