# Top 10 QuarkXPress Alternatives & Competitors
**Average Rating:** 4.0/5
**Total Number of Reviews:** 304
QuarkXPress is not the only option for Desktop Publishing Software. Explore other competing options and alternatives. Other important factors to consider when researching alternatives to QuarkXPress include user interface and design. The best overall QuarkXPress alternative is Canva. Other similar apps like QuarkXPress are Adobe InDesign, Microsoft Publisher, Marq, and Scribus. QuarkXPress alternatives can be found in [Desktop Publishing Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/desktop-publishing) but may also be in [PDF Editors](https://www.g2.com/categories/pdf-editor) or [Content Creation Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/content-creation).


## Best Paid & Free Alternatives to QuarkXPress
  - [Canva](https://www.g2.com/products/canva/reviews)
  - [Adobe InDesign](https://www.g2.com/products/adobe-indesign/reviews)
  - [Microsoft Publisher](https://www.g2.com/products/microsoft-publisher/reviews)
  - [Marq](https://www.g2.com/products/charles-thayne-capital-marq/reviews)
  - [Scribus](https://www.g2.com/products/scribus/reviews)
  - [Wondershare PDFelement](https://www.g2.com/products/wondershare-wondershare-pdfelement/reviews)
  - [Visme](https://www.g2.com/products/visme/reviews)
  - [Foxit PDF Editor](https://www.g2.com/products/foxit-pdf-editor/reviews)
  - [Bynder](https://www.g2.com/products/bynder/reviews)
  - [Semrush](https://www.g2.com/products/semrush/reviews)

## Top 10 Alternatives to QuarkXPress Recently Reviewed By G2 Community
Browse options below. Based on reviewer data, you can see how QuarkXPress stacks up to the competition, check reviews from current & previous users in industries like Graphic Design, Printing, and Newspapers, and find the best product for your business.


  ### 1. [Canva](https://www.g2.com/products/canva/reviews)
By Canva
**Average Rating:** 4.7/5
**Total Reviews:** 7,647
Canva is an online design and publishing platform that provides user friendly design tools for non-designers.


Reviewers say compared to QuarkXPress, Canva is:
- More usable
- Easier to do business with
- Easier to admin
Categories in common with QuarkXPress: [Desktop Publishing](https://www.g2.com/categories/desktop-publishing), [Content Creation](https://www.g2.com/categories/content-creation)

**Compare:** [QuarkXPress vs Canva](https://www.g2.com/compare/canva-vs-quarkxpress)
**Compare Canva with other alternatives:**
- [Canva vs Adobe InDesign](https://www.g2.com/compare/adobe-indesign-vs-canva)
- [Canva vs Microsoft Publisher](https://www.g2.com/compare/canva-vs-microsoft-publisher)
- [Canva vs Marq](https://www.g2.com/compare/canva-vs-charles-thayne-capital-marq)
- [Canva vs Scribus](https://www.g2.com/compare/canva-vs-scribus)
- [Canva vs Wondershare PDFelement](https://www.g2.com/compare/canva-vs-wondershare-wondershare-pdfelement)
- [Canva vs Visme](https://www.g2.com/compare/canva-vs-visme)
- [Canva vs Foxit PDF Editor](https://www.g2.com/compare/canva-vs-foxit-pdf-editor)
- [Canva vs Bynder](https://www.g2.com/compare/bynder-vs-canva)
- [Canva vs Semrush](https://www.g2.com/compare/canva-vs-semrush)

  ### 2. [Adobe InDesign](https://www.g2.com/products/adobe-indesign/reviews)
By Adobe
**Average Rating:** 4.6/5
**Total Reviews:** 3,439
Adobe InDesign is a versatile desktop publishing application that gives you pixel- perfect control over design and typography.


Reviewers say compared to QuarkXPress, Adobe InDesign is:
- Better at meeting requirements
- Easier to do business with
- More expensive
Categories in common with QuarkXPress: [Desktop Publishing](https://www.g2.com/categories/desktop-publishing)

**Compare:** [QuarkXPress vs Adobe InDesign](https://www.g2.com/compare/adobe-indesign-vs-quarkxpress)
**Compare Adobe InDesign with other alternatives:**
- [Adobe InDesign vs Canva](https://www.g2.com/compare/adobe-indesign-vs-canva)
- [Adobe InDesign vs Microsoft Publisher](https://www.g2.com/compare/adobe-indesign-vs-microsoft-publisher)
- [Adobe InDesign vs Marq](https://www.g2.com/compare/adobe-indesign-vs-charles-thayne-capital-marq)
- [Adobe InDesign vs Scribus](https://www.g2.com/compare/adobe-indesign-vs-scribus)
- [Adobe InDesign vs Wondershare PDFelement](https://www.g2.com/compare/adobe-indesign-vs-wondershare-wondershare-pdfelement)
- [Adobe InDesign vs Visme](https://www.g2.com/compare/adobe-indesign-vs-visme)
- [Adobe InDesign vs Foxit PDF Editor](https://www.g2.com/compare/adobe-indesign-vs-foxit-pdf-editor)
- [Adobe InDesign vs Bynder](https://www.g2.com/compare/adobe-indesign-vs-bynder)
- [Adobe InDesign vs Semrush](https://www.g2.com/compare/adobe-indesign-vs-semrush)

  ### 3. [Microsoft Publisher](https://www.g2.com/products/microsoft-publisher/reviews)
By Microsoft
**Average Rating:** 4.3/5
**Total Reviews:** 1,007
Microsoft Publisher is a desktop publishing application designed to help users create professional-quality publications with ease. It offers a range of pre-designed templates and intuitive tools, enabling the creation of various materials such as brochures, newsletters, greeting cards, and more. With a focus on page layout and design, Publisher allows for precise control over text, images, and other elements, ensuring that the final product appears exactly as intended, whether in print, online, or via email. Key Features and Functionality: - Pre-Designed Templates: Access a wide array of customizable templates to quickly start projects like brochures, newsletters, and postcards. - Advanced Layout Tools: Utilize detailed rulers and guides for accurate placement of text and images, ensuring a polished and professional appearance. - Image Editing Capabilities: Incorporate high-quality images with built-in editing tools, allowing for adjustments and enhancements directly within the application. - Mail Merge Functionality: Personalize publications by merging text and images from databases, ideal for creating tailored marketing materials. - Versatile Publishing Options: Share publications through various formats, including print, email, or export to industry-standard non-editable formats. Primary Value and User Solutions: Microsoft Publisher empowers users, particularly small businesses and individuals without formal design training, to produce high-quality, professional publications in-house. By providing user-friendly tools and templates, it eliminates the need for expensive design software or professional designers, making it accessible for creating marketing materials, event invitations, and more. This accessibility ensures that users can maintain brand consistency and effectively communicate their messages to their target audience.


Reviewers say compared to QuarkXPress, Microsoft Publisher is:
- More usable
- Easier to admin
- Easier to set up
Categories in common with QuarkXPress: [Desktop Publishing](https://www.g2.com/categories/desktop-publishing)

**Compare:** [QuarkXPress vs Microsoft Publisher](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-publisher-vs-quarkxpress)
**Compare Microsoft Publisher with other alternatives:**
- [Microsoft Publisher vs Canva](https://www.g2.com/compare/canva-vs-microsoft-publisher)
- [Microsoft Publisher vs Adobe InDesign](https://www.g2.com/compare/adobe-indesign-vs-microsoft-publisher)
- [Microsoft Publisher vs Marq](https://www.g2.com/compare/charles-thayne-capital-marq-vs-microsoft-publisher)
- [Microsoft Publisher vs Scribus](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-publisher-vs-scribus)
- [Microsoft Publisher vs Wondershare PDFelement](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-publisher-vs-wondershare-wondershare-pdfelement)
- [Microsoft Publisher vs Visme](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-publisher-vs-visme)
- [Microsoft Publisher vs Foxit PDF Editor](https://www.g2.com/compare/foxit-pdf-editor-vs-microsoft-publisher)
- [Microsoft Publisher vs Bynder](https://www.g2.com/compare/bynder-vs-microsoft-publisher)
- [Microsoft Publisher vs Semrush](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-publisher-vs-semrush)

  ### 4. [Marq](https://www.g2.com/products/charles-thayne-capital-marq/reviews)
By Marq
**Average Rating:** 4.5/5
**Total Reviews:** 210
Marq is a web-based layout and design tool with real-time collaboration. Work with anyone, on any browser, at any time.


Reviewers say compared to QuarkXPress, Marq is:
- More usable
- Easier to do business with
- Easier to admin
Categories in common with QuarkXPress: [Desktop Publishing](https://www.g2.com/categories/desktop-publishing), [Content Creation](https://www.g2.com/categories/content-creation)

**Compare:** [QuarkXPress vs Marq](https://www.g2.com/compare/charles-thayne-capital-marq-vs-quarkxpress)
**Compare Marq with other alternatives:**
- [Marq vs Canva](https://www.g2.com/compare/canva-vs-charles-thayne-capital-marq)
- [Marq vs Adobe InDesign](https://www.g2.com/compare/adobe-indesign-vs-charles-thayne-capital-marq)
- [Marq vs Microsoft Publisher](https://www.g2.com/compare/charles-thayne-capital-marq-vs-microsoft-publisher)
- [Marq vs Scribus](https://www.g2.com/compare/charles-thayne-capital-marq-vs-scribus)
- [Marq vs Wondershare PDFelement](https://www.g2.com/compare/charles-thayne-capital-marq-vs-wondershare-wondershare-pdfelement)
- [Marq vs Visme](https://www.g2.com/compare/charles-thayne-capital-marq-vs-visme)
- [Marq vs Foxit PDF Editor](https://www.g2.com/compare/foxit-pdf-editor-vs-charles-thayne-capital-marq)
- [Marq vs Bynder](https://www.g2.com/compare/bynder-vs-charles-thayne-capital-marq)
- [Marq vs Semrush](https://www.g2.com/compare/charles-thayne-capital-marq-vs-semrush)

  ### 5. [Scribus](https://www.g2.com/products/scribus/reviews)
By The Scribus Team
**Average Rating:** 4.1/5
**Total Reviews:** 28
Scribus is an open source alternative for entry-level desktop publishing.


Reviewers say compared to QuarkXPress, Scribus is:
- Easier to set up
- Better at meeting requirements
- Better at support
Categories in common with QuarkXPress: [Desktop Publishing](https://www.g2.com/categories/desktop-publishing)

**Compare:** [QuarkXPress vs Scribus](https://www.g2.com/compare/quarkxpress-vs-scribus)
**Compare Scribus with other alternatives:**
- [Scribus vs Canva](https://www.g2.com/compare/canva-vs-scribus)
- [Scribus vs Adobe InDesign](https://www.g2.com/compare/adobe-indesign-vs-scribus)
- [Scribus vs Microsoft Publisher](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-publisher-vs-scribus)
- [Scribus vs Marq](https://www.g2.com/compare/charles-thayne-capital-marq-vs-scribus)
- [Scribus vs Wondershare PDFelement](https://www.g2.com/compare/scribus-vs-wondershare-wondershare-pdfelement)
- [Scribus vs Visme](https://www.g2.com/compare/scribus-vs-visme)
- [Scribus vs Foxit PDF Editor](https://www.g2.com/compare/foxit-pdf-editor-vs-scribus)
- [Scribus vs Bynder](https://www.g2.com/compare/bynder-vs-scribus)
- [Scribus vs Semrush](https://www.g2.com/compare/scribus-vs-semrush)

  ### 6. [Wondershare PDFelement](https://www.g2.com/products/wondershare-wondershare-pdfelement/reviews)
By Wondershare
**Average Rating:** 4.5/5
**Total Reviews:** 1,044
As a top-rated PDF software, PDFelement ensures high-quality PDF editing with unmatched precision. Easily modify text, images, and layouts in your PDF files, or convert PDFs to and from Word, Excel, PPT, and more while preserving formatting. Its robust security features allow you to password-protect, redact sensitive data, and sign PDFs electronically for secure collaboration.


Reviewers say compared to QuarkXPress, Wondershare PDFelement is:
- More usable
- Easier to set up
- Easier to do business with
Categories in common with QuarkXPress: [Desktop Publishing](https://www.g2.com/categories/desktop-publishing)

**Compare:** [QuarkXPress vs Wondershare PDFelement](https://www.g2.com/compare/quarkxpress-vs-wondershare-wondershare-pdfelement)
**Compare Wondershare PDFelement with other alternatives:**
- [Wondershare PDFelement vs Canva](https://www.g2.com/compare/canva-vs-wondershare-wondershare-pdfelement)
- [Wondershare PDFelement vs Adobe InDesign](https://www.g2.com/compare/adobe-indesign-vs-wondershare-wondershare-pdfelement)
- [Wondershare PDFelement vs Microsoft Publisher](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-publisher-vs-wondershare-wondershare-pdfelement)
- [Wondershare PDFelement vs Marq](https://www.g2.com/compare/charles-thayne-capital-marq-vs-wondershare-wondershare-pdfelement)
- [Wondershare PDFelement vs Scribus](https://www.g2.com/compare/scribus-vs-wondershare-wondershare-pdfelement)
- [Wondershare PDFelement vs Visme](https://www.g2.com/compare/visme-vs-wondershare-wondershare-pdfelement)
- [Wondershare PDFelement vs Foxit PDF Editor](https://www.g2.com/compare/foxit-pdf-editor-vs-wondershare-wondershare-pdfelement)
- [Wondershare PDFelement vs Bynder](https://www.g2.com/compare/bynder-vs-wondershare-wondershare-pdfelement)
- [Wondershare PDFelement vs Semrush](https://www.g2.com/compare/semrush-vs-wondershare-wondershare-pdfelement)

  ### 7. [Visme](https://www.g2.com/products/visme/reviews)
By Visme
**Average Rating:** 4.5/5
**Total Reviews:** 512
An intuitive cloud based tool empowering individuals and organizations to create and present stories and boring data into stunning Presentations, Infographics, Reports and other forms of visual content.


Reviewers say compared to QuarkXPress, Visme is:
- Easier to do business with
- More usable
- Better at support
Categories in common with QuarkXPress: [Desktop Publishing](https://www.g2.com/categories/desktop-publishing), [Content Creation](https://www.g2.com/categories/content-creation)

**Compare:** [QuarkXPress vs Visme](https://www.g2.com/compare/quarkxpress-vs-visme)
**Compare Visme with other alternatives:**
- [Visme vs Canva](https://www.g2.com/compare/canva-vs-visme)
- [Visme vs Adobe InDesign](https://www.g2.com/compare/adobe-indesign-vs-visme)
- [Visme vs Microsoft Publisher](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-publisher-vs-visme)
- [Visme vs Marq](https://www.g2.com/compare/charles-thayne-capital-marq-vs-visme)
- [Visme vs Scribus](https://www.g2.com/compare/scribus-vs-visme)
- [Visme vs Wondershare PDFelement](https://www.g2.com/compare/visme-vs-wondershare-wondershare-pdfelement)
- [Visme vs Foxit PDF Editor](https://www.g2.com/compare/foxit-pdf-editor-vs-visme)
- [Visme vs Bynder](https://www.g2.com/compare/bynder-vs-visme)
- [Visme vs Semrush](https://www.g2.com/compare/semrush-vs-visme)

  ### 8. [Foxit PDF Editor](https://www.g2.com/products/foxit-pdf-editor/reviews)
By Foxit
**Average Rating:** 4.6/5
**Total Reviews:** 3,699
Founded in 2001, Foxit is a leading provider of innovative PDF and eSignature products and services, helping knowledge workers increase productivity and do more with documents. Foxit combines easy-to-use desktop software, mobile apps, and cloud services in one powerful solution: The Foxit PDF Editor. This Intelligent Document Platform allows users to create, edit, fill, and sign documents through their integrated PDF Editor and eSign offerings – from anywhere and on any device. Foxit also enables software developers to incorporate innovative PDF technology into their applications via powerful, multi-platform Software Developer Kits (SDK). Winner of numerous awards, Foxit has over 700 million users and has sold to over 485,000 customers, ranging from SMBs to global enterprises worldwide. Foxit products are ISO 32000-1/PDF 1.7 standard compliant, therefore, compatible with your existing PDF documents and forms.


Reviewers say compared to QuarkXPress, Foxit PDF Editor is:
- Better at meeting requirements
- More usable
- Better at support
Categories in common with QuarkXPress: [Desktop Publishing](https://www.g2.com/categories/desktop-publishing)

**Compare:** [QuarkXPress vs Foxit PDF Editor](https://www.g2.com/compare/foxit-pdf-editor-vs-quarkxpress)
**Compare Foxit PDF Editor with other alternatives:**
- [Foxit PDF Editor vs Canva](https://www.g2.com/compare/canva-vs-foxit-pdf-editor)
- [Foxit PDF Editor vs Adobe InDesign](https://www.g2.com/compare/adobe-indesign-vs-foxit-pdf-editor)
- [Foxit PDF Editor vs Microsoft Publisher](https://www.g2.com/compare/foxit-pdf-editor-vs-microsoft-publisher)
- [Foxit PDF Editor vs Marq](https://www.g2.com/compare/foxit-pdf-editor-vs-charles-thayne-capital-marq)
- [Foxit PDF Editor vs Scribus](https://www.g2.com/compare/foxit-pdf-editor-vs-scribus)
- [Foxit PDF Editor vs Wondershare PDFelement](https://www.g2.com/compare/foxit-pdf-editor-vs-wondershare-wondershare-pdfelement)
- [Foxit PDF Editor vs Visme](https://www.g2.com/compare/foxit-pdf-editor-vs-visme)
- [Foxit PDF Editor vs Bynder](https://www.g2.com/compare/bynder-vs-foxit-pdf-editor)
- [Foxit PDF Editor vs Semrush](https://www.g2.com/compare/foxit-pdf-editor-vs-semrush)

  ### 9. [Bynder](https://www.g2.com/products/bynder/reviews)
By Bynder
**Average Rating:** 4.5/5
**Total Reviews:** 1,165
Brand Portal & Digital Asset Management Software


Reviewers say compared to QuarkXPress, Bynder is:
- Better at support
- Easier to do business with
- More usable
Categories in common with QuarkXPress: [Content Creation](https://www.g2.com/categories/content-creation)

**Compare:** [QuarkXPress vs Bynder](https://www.g2.com/compare/bynder-vs-quarkxpress)
**Compare Bynder with other alternatives:**
- [Bynder vs Canva](https://www.g2.com/compare/bynder-vs-canva)
- [Bynder vs Adobe InDesign](https://www.g2.com/compare/adobe-indesign-vs-bynder)
- [Bynder vs Microsoft Publisher](https://www.g2.com/compare/bynder-vs-microsoft-publisher)
- [Bynder vs Marq](https://www.g2.com/compare/bynder-vs-charles-thayne-capital-marq)
- [Bynder vs Scribus](https://www.g2.com/compare/bynder-vs-scribus)
- [Bynder vs Wondershare PDFelement](https://www.g2.com/compare/bynder-vs-wondershare-wondershare-pdfelement)
- [Bynder vs Visme](https://www.g2.com/compare/bynder-vs-visme)
- [Bynder vs Foxit PDF Editor](https://www.g2.com/compare/bynder-vs-foxit-pdf-editor)
- [Bynder vs Semrush](https://www.g2.com/compare/bynder-vs-semrush)

  ### 10. [Semrush](https://www.g2.com/products/semrush/reviews)
By Adobe
**Average Rating:** 4.4/5
**Total Reviews:** 4,026
Online Visibility and Content Marketing SaaS Platform


Reviewers say compared to QuarkXPress, Semrush is:
- Easier to do business with
- Better at meeting requirements
- Better at support
Categories in common with QuarkXPress: [Content Creation](https://www.g2.com/categories/content-creation)

**Compare:** [QuarkXPress vs Semrush](https://www.g2.com/compare/quarkxpress-vs-semrush)
**Compare Semrush with other alternatives:**
- [Semrush vs Canva](https://www.g2.com/compare/canva-vs-semrush)
- [Semrush vs Adobe InDesign](https://www.g2.com/compare/adobe-indesign-vs-semrush)
- [Semrush vs Microsoft Publisher](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-publisher-vs-semrush)
- [Semrush vs Marq](https://www.g2.com/compare/charles-thayne-capital-marq-vs-semrush)
- [Semrush vs Scribus](https://www.g2.com/compare/scribus-vs-semrush)
- [Semrush vs Wondershare PDFelement](https://www.g2.com/compare/semrush-vs-wondershare-wondershare-pdfelement)
- [Semrush vs Visme](https://www.g2.com/compare/semrush-vs-visme)
- [Semrush vs Foxit PDF Editor](https://www.g2.com/compare/foxit-pdf-editor-vs-semrush)
- [Semrush vs Bynder](https://www.g2.com/compare/bynder-vs-semrush)


---
## QuarkXPress Alternatives FAQs

### How does Quark compare to Canva?

According to G2 data, [Quark](https://www.g2.com/products/quarkxpress/reviews) has an average rating of 4.0/5 from 304 reviews, whereas [Canva](https://www.g2.com/products/canva/reviews) holds a significantly higher average rating of 4.7/5 based on 7,518 reviews. Canva leads Quark by 1.1 points in meeting requirements (9.2 vs 8.1), 1.5 points in usability (9.4 vs 7.9), 1.1 points in ease of setup (9.6 vs 8.5), 1.2 points in ease of administration (9.4 vs 8.2), 1.0 point in support (8.9 vs 7.9), and 1.3 points in ease of doing business (9.4 vs 8.1). User feedback highlights Canva's extensive template library, intuitive drag-and-drop interface, and AI-powered features that simplify design creation for both beginners and professionals. In contrast, Quark is praised for its professional-level layout and print capabilities. Canva's cloud-based platform offers seamless collaboration and accessibility across devices, while Quark is recognized for its strong print data output and integration with common file formats. Overall, Canva excels in ease of use, feature variety, and user satisfaction, making it a preferred choice for a broad audience, whereas Quark caters more to specialized professional publishing needs.



### What are the best alternatives to Quark?

Top alternatives to Quark include [Canva](https://www.g2.com/products/canva/reviews) (4.7/5 stars, 7,518 reviews), [Adobe InDesign](https://www.g2.com/products/adobe-indesign/reviews) (4.6/5 stars, 3,436 reviews), and [Microsoft Publisher](https://www.g2.com/products/microsoft-publisher/reviews) (4.3/5 stars, 1,005 reviews). Other notable options are [Marq](https://www.g2.com/products/charles-thayne-capital-marq/reviews) (4.5/5 stars, 210 reviews) and [Affinity Publisher](https://www.g2.com/products/affinity-publisher/reviews) (4.7/5 stars, 73 reviews). These alternatives offer higher user satisfaction, better ease of administration, and more robust support.



### What features do alternatives offer that Quark does not?

Quark lacks advanced cloud collaboration tools, seamless integration with popular design ecosystems like Adobe Creative Cloud, and modern AI-powered design assistance features that alternatives provide. It also has limited support for multi-layout documents within a single file and less intuitive digital publishing capabilities.



### Which Desktop Publishing tools do reviewers recommend instead of Quark?

Reviewers recommend [Adobe InDesign](https://www.g2.com/products/adobe-indesign/reviews) for its pixel-perfect control over typography, seamless integration with Adobe Creative Cloud, and superior handling of multi-page and complex documents. [Canva](https://www.g2.com/products/canva/reviews) is favored for its ease of use, extensive template library, and AI-powered design features that enable quick creation of professional visuals without advanced skills. [Microsoft Publisher](https://www.g2.com/products/microsoft-publisher/reviews) is suggested for users seeking a familiar Microsoft Office interface with strong template availability and straightforward layout tools. Additionally, [Affinity Publisher](https://www.g2.com/products/affinity-publisher/reviews) is recommended as a cost-effective, one-time purchase alternative with powerful desktop publishing features and integration with Affinity Designer and Photo. Users emphasize the importance of training and exploring the feature sets of these tools to maximize their benefits over Quark.



### Why do users choose Canva over Quark?

Users choose [Canva](https://www.g2.com/products/canva/reviews) over Quark primarily for its superior ease of use and accessibility, as reflected in its 9.4 usability score compared to Quark's 7.9. With over 1,700 mentions of ease of use and 1,200 mentions of template availability, Canva enables users—including those without design experience—to create professional-quality content quickly using a vast library of customizable templates and AI-powered tools. Its cloud-based platform supports seamless collaboration and cross-device access, which is highly valued by teams and individual users alike. Additionally, Canva's faster setup (9.6 vs 8.5) and stronger support (8.9 vs 7.9) contribute to a smoother onboarding and ongoing experience. While Quark offers advanced print and layout features, its steeper learning curve and less intuitive interface make Canva the preferred choice for users seeking efficiency, versatility, and a lower barrier to entry. Canva's extensive integration options and continuous feature updates further enhance its appeal, making it a cost-effective and user-friendly solution for a wide range of design needs, from social media graphics to presentations and marketing materials.




## Explore Articles
- [Best video conferencing app for small business](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-s-the-best-video-conferencing-app-for-small-businesses)
- [What's the most effective AR training simulator software for onboarding new employees?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-s-the-most-effective-ar-training-simulator-software-for-onboarding-new-employees)
- [Which enterprise content delivery network (eCDN) platforms have pre-built connectors to streaming infrastructure and broadcast systems?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/which-enterprise-content-delivery-network-ecdn-platforms-have-pre-built-connectors-to-streaming-infrastructure-and-broadcast-systems)
- [SurveyMonkey vs Typeform for a research team that needs proper logic, skip patterns and analytics built in?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/surveymonkey-vs-typeform-for-a-research-team-that-needs-proper-logic-skip-patterns-and-analytics-built-in)
- [What is the most affordable job description management tool for SMBs?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-is-the-most-affordable-job-description-management-tool-for-smbs)
- [Which vendor offers the most secure encrypted video calls?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/which-vendor-offers-the-most-secure-encrypted-video-calls)

## Spotlight Categories
- [Contact Center Workforce Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/contact-center-workforce)
- [Survey Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/survey)
- [Professional Services Automation Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/professional-services-automation)