WE'd been struggling to get the whole team involved in automation; most of it fell on two engineers. After switching to ACCELQ, that changed pretty quickly. the visual test building and Design-First AI architech meant our non-dev folks could actually contribute without needing hand-holding. the autonomous discover for faster test coverage and reusable assets helped cut down repeated scripts and speed up releases. the Agentic AI-powered test automation capabilities really changed how we approach QA> We're not going back. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Advanced scenarios have a learning curve, and i think some more detailed documentation would help. And auto-retry or occasional page load issues would also imprve reliability. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What stands out most about ACCELQ is its model-based, codeless automation approach, which significantly reduces test maintenance compared to traditional script-heavy tools. Once the application behavior is defined, tests become easier to reuse and adapt as the application evolves. The platform also supports web and API testing in a unified way, which helps us manage end-to-end test scenarios more effectively. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There is a learning curve at the beginning, especially for teams transitioning from script-based automation. Some advanced scenarios require deeper familiarity with the platform’s structure, and reporting, while useful, could benefit from more customization options for different stakeholders. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What we appreciate most about ACCELQ is t's no code approach to automation. Our teams are able to design and execute automated tests for both web and API applications without writing code. This has made collaboration between QA engineers, analysts, and business stakeholders much easier. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Advanced customization may require guidance from documentation or support. Initial setup and learning the platform structure can take some time. But kind of easy to integrate if you have Tech experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really like ACCELQ's no Code Automation and its robust support for web, mobile, and API testing. It allows our teams to quickly create and maintain tests, integrate with CI/CD pipelines, and gain real-time insights into quality metrics. The platform's intuitive interface and collaborative features help us maintain high-quality standards and regulatory compliance efficiently. Additionally, ACCELQ's automation speeds up onboarding and reduces dependency on specialized resources, and its support across critical systems ensures comprehensive coverage, which is vital for our medical devices and internal applications. The initial setup was smooth and straightforward, with guided configuration enabling us to start automating tests and managing workflows efficiently. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While ACCELQ is a powerful platform, there are a few areas that could be improved to better serve complex medical device environments. Reporting and dashboard capabilities could be more customizable, allowing us to track specific metrics and trends across multiple projects more efficiently. Enhanced integration with certain legacy systems and specialized medical software would also be valuable, as it would streamline workflows and reduce manual coordination. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use ACCELQ mainly for automating our API and web application testing as part of our QA process, and it helps us manage both manual and automated testing in one place. What I like most about ACCELQ is its no-code automation and how easy it is for the team to start using it. Testers don't need strong programming skills, but they can still build and run automation tests. With ACCELQ's no-code approach, updates are much easier and the maintenance effort is much lower. Our team mostly uses the no-code test design features, which allow testers to create automation without writing scripts. We also use the API testing and web automation capabilities quite often. Having both on the same platform helps us cover different layers of the application without switching tools. The initial setup was fairly straightforward for our team since ACCELQ is cloud-based, so we didn't have to spend time on infrastructure or local setup. Additionally, it works well with CI/CD tools, so we can include automated tests as part of our build and release process. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think the learning curve could be improved with more beginner friendly onboarding materials. For example, step by step tutorials or short videos that show how to create a test from start to finish would really help new team members understand the workflow faster. One area that could improve is the learning curve at the beginning. Since ACCELQ has many features, it can take some time for new team members to fully understand the platform. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like ACCELQ for its user-friendly and codeless automation approach, which makes testing easier and faster. It streamlines test creation and execution without needing advanced programming skills and supports strong collaboration among team members. Its ability to provide accurate and reliable testing results is helpful. Plus, the platform helps automate software testing and improve test coverage, creating, managing, and executing test cases with ease. It speeds up the testing process and helps identify bugs early, improving software quality. I also appreciate how ACCELQ integrates with tools like Jira, Azure DevOps, ClickUp, Jenkins, GitHub Actions, Bamboo, BrowserStack, and Sauce Labs to enhance testing and development workflows. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One area that could be improved in ACCELQ is its learning curve for new users, as some advanced features can be slightly complex to understand. The platform interface can sometimes feel slow when handling large test suites. More detailed documentation or tutorials would help users get started faster. Additionally, expanding integration options with other tools could make it even more flexible. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The codeless automation approach is the biggest advantage. It makes test creation and maintenance much simpler, supports reusability, and integrates well with CI/CD pipelines, helping teams deliver faster with less effort. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The platform has a learning curve for first-time users, and some advanced customizations can be less intuitive. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like ACCELQ's codeless automation approach and user-friendly interface, which makes test creation quick and simple for everyone. It helps both technical and non-technical team members to create and manage tests without needing programming skills. This allows us to build test cases faster, reduce dependency on developers, and quickly update tests whenever requirements change. The integrations with tools like Jenkins, Jira, and Git streamline our workflow. Connecting with Jenkins allows us to automatically trigger test executions as part of our CI/CD pipeline, which saves time and ensures continuous testing with every build or deployment. Integration with Jira helps us easily track defects and link test cases. Since ACCELQ is a cloud-based and codeless platform, there was no need for complex installations or heavy technical configuration, which saved us a lot of time. We were able to onboard the team quickly, connect our applications, and start creating test cases almost immediately. I rated ACCELQ a 10 out of 10 for recommendation because it has made our testing process faster, easier, and more efficient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think there could be more advanced customization options and deeper reporting or analytics features. It would be helpful to have more flexibility in configuring workflows, reusable components, and test logic to better match our specific project requirements. Options like custom templates, advanced parameterization, and more control over execution settings would allow us to design tests that fit complex scenarios more easily. For reporting, I would like more detailed dashboards that show pass/fail rates over time, flaky test detection, execution history, and defect trends to help us quickly identify problem areas and improve stability. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use ACCELQ for automated testing of web and mobile applications. I really like its no-code automation approach because it makes test creation fast and easy, even without heavy scripting. Its smart self-healing capabilities and reusable test logic work especially well. I also appreciate how ACCELQ integrates with CI/CD tools like Jenkins for continuous testing and with Jira for test management. The combination of these features led our team to highly rate ACCELQ a 10 out of 10. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

ACCELQ is powerful, but the initial setup and learning curve can be a bit challenging for new users. It could be improved by offering more guided onboarding, such as step-by-step setup. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like the natural language approach for creating test cases in ACCELQ. It makes the tests easier to understand and maintain, even for team members who are not deeply technical. The platform also provides clear visibility into test results, which helps the team track progress and quickly identify issues. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some areas of the platform take time to get familiar with, especially when setting up more complex test scenarios. In addition, the documentation could include more practical examples to help new users get started more quickly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.