Compare Jira and OpenText Application Quality Management 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (43.9% of reviews)
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free 10 Users Per Month
No pricing available
Jira
Star Rating
(7,563)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (43.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free 10 Users Per Month
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plansOpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality ManagementSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Jira excels in providing visibility into tasks, bugs, and sprint status, with features like custom workflows and agile boards that help manage development work in a structured and transparent way. This level of organization is a significant advantage for teams looking to streamline their processes.
- Users say that OpenText Application Quality Management is effective for managing the entire software development life cycle, offering a centralized platform for requirements gathering, defect logging, and tracking. However, some users feel that while it covers many aspects, it may not be as intuitive as Jira for day-to-day task management.
- Reviewers mention that Jira's implementation process is quick and user-friendly, with an intuitive onboarding wizard that helps teams get started without a steep learning curve. This contrasts with OpenText, where some users have noted challenges in setup and configuration.
- According to verified reviews, Jira consistently receives higher ratings for overall user satisfaction, with a strong emphasis on its ability to organize and structure development workflows effectively. Users appreciate features like backlog management and sprint planning, which provide clear visibility into tasks and progress.
- Users highlight that while OpenText Application Quality Management offers robust tracking capabilities, it may not match Jira's ease of use. Some users find it convenient but mention that it can feel cumbersome compared to Jira's more streamlined interface.
- G2 reviewers note that Jira's support quality is rated higher, with users praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team. In contrast, OpenText's support has received mixed feedback, indicating that there may be room for improvement in this area.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Jira
Free
Free
10 Users Per Month
Free forever for 10 users
- Unlimited goals, projects, tasks, and forms
- Backlog, list, board, timeline, calendar, and summary views
- Reports and dashboards
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing availableFree Trial
Jira
Free Trial is available
OpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.9
6,162
8.2
118
Ease of Use
8.1
6,246
7.9
118
Ease of Setup
8.0
2,451
7.2
61
Ease of Admin
7.6
1,539
7.2
59
Quality of Support
8.3
4,841
7.7
106
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.5
1,401
7.7
56
Product Direction (% positive)
8.4
5,986
6.8
116
Features by Category
Tasks
9.3
691
Not enough data
9.0
646
Not enough data
9.1
672
Not enough data
8.7
636
Not enough data
8.5
603
Not enough data
8.2
600
Not enough data
8.5
615
Not enough data
8.4
546
Not enough data
Projects
8.9
633
Not enough data
8.7
582
Not enough data
8.2
563
Not enough data
8.4
569
Not enough data
8.6
586
Not enough data
7.8
506
Not enough data
9.2
623
Not enough data
8.3
565
Not enough data
8.1
496
Not enough data
8.1
515
Not enough data
8.6
577
Not enough data
Resource Management
8.3
536
Not enough data
8.4
559
Not enough data
8.5
542
Not enough data
Project Monitoring
8.4
533
Not enough data
8.4
543
Not enough data
8.8
600
Not enough data
Generative AI
7.4
469
Not enough data
7.6
468
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Project Management
7.5
333
Not enough data
7.8
333
Not enough data
7.9
360
Not enough data
7.7
330
Not enough data
7.7
334
Not enough data
7.5
332
Not enough data
7.9
342
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Management
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Bug Reporting
8.8
1823
8.3
11
8.8
1779
9.2
12
8.9
1860
8.5
12
Bug Monitoring
8.7
1770
9.0
12
8.9
1881
9.2
12
8.8
1746
8.6
11
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
7.7
281
Not enough data
7.8
283
Not enough data
7.7
281
Not enough data
Responses
9.5
38
Not enough data
9.4
38
Not enough data
9.4
38
Not enough data
Automation - AI Agents
9.0
37
Not enough data
9.1
36
Not enough data
9.0
37
Not enough data
9.4
37
Not enough data
9.4
37
Not enough data
Platform
9.3
38
Not enough data
9.5
41
Not enough data
9.3
38
Not enough data
Autonomy - AI Agents
9.0
37
Not enough data
9.1
37
Not enough data
9.2
37
Not enough data
9.1
37
Not enough data
Generative AI
9.3
40
Not enough data
9.2
37
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Automation
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
8.4
2728
Not enough data
8.2
2582
Not enough data
8.2
2486
Not enough data
Planning
8.7
3208
Not enough data
8.8
3312
Not enough data
8.8
3072
Not enough data
8.7
3229
Not enough data
8.3
2707
Not enough data
Workflow Management
8.6
3077
Not enough data
8.9
3459
Not enough data
7.9
2320
Not enough data
8.4
2555
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Procedural
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Agents
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Jira and OpenText Application Quality Management are categorized as Bug Tracking
Unique Categories
Jira is categorized as Product Management, Project Management, and AI Agents For Business Operations
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Test Management, Requirements Management, ALM Software, Software Testing, Automation Testing, and AWS Marketplace
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Jira
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
24.0%
Computer Software
23.7%
Financial Services
4.6%
Internet
4.1%
Marketing and Advertising
4.1%
Other
39.5%
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Discussions
Is Jira a good tool?
12 Comments
MP
Yes, It's very useful, Just start on it and give some time on that.Read more
What are the features of JIRA?
11 Comments
CS
Allows you to setup your project as your team/company flows thru the agile process. You can see what is next in the sprint, where others are, enter your...Read more
How is Jira transforming project management practices in agile software development teams?
8 Comments
VC
help teams plan sprints, manage backlogsRead more
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
