2026 Best Software Awards are here!See the list
Compare GitHub and Review Board 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.4% of reviews)
Mid-Market (50.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
No pricing available
GitHub
Star Rating
(2,300)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plansReview Board
Star Rating
(16)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (50.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Review BoardSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that GitHub excels in overall user satisfaction, boasting a significantly higher G2 Score compared to Review Board. Users appreciate its robust features for version control and collaboration, with one reviewer highlighting how easy it is to share work and review code within their own branch.
- According to verified reviews, GitHub's extensive user base is reflected in its total number of reviews, which far surpasses that of Review Board. With over 2,200 reviews, users feel confident in the platform's reliability and effectiveness, especially when utilizing features like pull requests and GitHub Actions for smooth team development.
- Users say that GitHub's ease of use is a standout feature, with a high rating that indicates a user-friendly experience. Reviewers mention that the platform's intuitive interface and integration with CI/CD tools make it a favorite for both seasoned developers and newcomers alike.
- Reviewers mention that while Review Board offers a simple interface that helps new users quickly understand the code review process, it struggles to match the comprehensive capabilities of GitHub. Users appreciate the clear feedback provided by Review Board, but some feel it lacks the depth and variety of features that GitHub provides.
- According to recent user feedback, GitHub's collaborative features are particularly praised, with users noting how it facilitates teamwork across different functions. The ability to access a wide range of projects and repositories enhances the collaborative experience, making it a preferred choice for many.
- Users report that while Review Board is effective for providing feedback and improving code quality, it may not be as versatile as GitHub in terms of overall functionality. Reviewers appreciate the straightforward feedback process, but some express a desire for more advanced features that could enhance their workflow.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitHub
Free for Individuals and Organizations
$0.00
1 users
Basics for teams and developers
- Unlimited public/private repositories
- Unlimited collaborators
- 2,000 Actions minutes/month (Free for public repositories)
Review Board
No pricing availableFree Trial
GitHub
Free Trial is available
Review Board
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.3
1,990
9.2
13
Ease of Use
8.7
2,007
8.5
13
Ease of Setup
9.0
618
9.4
6
Ease of Admin
8.7
452
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.7
1,592
8.3
11
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
388
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
1,941
8.1
12
Features by Category
Administration
8.9
138
Not enough data
9.0
145
Not enough data
8.6
138
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
142
Not enough data
8.5
126
Not enough data
8.8
130
Not enough data
9.0
142
Not enough data
8.1
125
Not enough data
Processes
9.0
142
Not enough data
8.7
136
Not enough data
8.6
137
Not enough data
Administration
9.0
40
Not enough data
8.8
38
Not enough data
Analysis
8.4
39
Not enough data
8.7
42
Not enough data
8.6
39
Not enough data
8.8
44
Not enough data
Testing
9.1
40
Not enough data
8.2
34
Not enough data
8.4
36
Not enough data
8.5
33
Not enough data
8.3
32
Not enough data
8.6
33
Not enough data
8.0
32
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
9.0
90
Not enough data
9.0
89
Not enough data
8.6
90
Not enough data
9.1
93
Not enough data
Automation
8.8
90
Not enough data
8.6
82
Not enough data
8.7
89
Not enough data
8.8
83
Not enough data
IT Management
8.9
92
Not enough data
8.8
83
Not enough data
8.7
79
Not enough data
Functionality
9.1
237
Not enough data
9.1
244
Not enough data
8.8
231
Not enough data
Management
9.0
236
Not enough data
8.4
224
Not enough data
9.0
241
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
9.0
23
Not enough data
8.7
22
Not enough data
8.5
20
Not enough data
8.7
22
Not enough data
8.7
22
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.9
186
Not enough data
8.8
180
Not enough data
9.0
185
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
8.4
180
Not enough data
8.9
194
Not enough data
9.0
179
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
9.0
18
Not enough data
8.9
18
Not enough data
8.6
18
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.8
64
Not enough data
9.0
69
Not enough data
9.1
68
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.7
66
Not enough data
9.0
69
Not enough data
8.8
67
Not enough data
Management
8.8
132
Not enough data
9.1
139
Not enough data
8.6
127
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
136
Not enough data
8.9
133
Not enough data
8.6
127
Not enough data
Processes
8.9
133
Not enough data
8.8
127
Not enough data
9.1
136
Not enough data
Functionality
9.2
221
Not enough data
8.9
207
Not enough data
8.6
197
Not enough data
Management
8.8
216
Not enough data
8.8
210
Not enough data
8.2
202
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
8.4
24
Not enough data
8.5
25
Not enough data
8.5
24
Not enough data
7.8
26
Not enough data
8.2
25
Not enough data
Documentation
8.7
176
Not enough data
8.7
170
Not enough data
8.5
162
Not enough data
Security
8.2
158
Not enough data
8.5
160
Not enough data
8.9
170
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GitHub and Review Board are categorized as Peer Code Review
Unique Categories
GitHub is categorized as DevOps Platforms, Software Composition Analysis, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Application Release Orchestration, Version Control Hosting, Continuous Delivery, Gaming Tools, Bug Tracking, Configuration Management, Continuous Integration, Build Automation, and Secure Code Review
Review Board has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitHub
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Review Board
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
31.9%
Information Technology and Services
22.6%
Internet
6.6%
Higher Education
3.4%
Financial Services
3.2%
Other
32.3%
Computer Software
56.3%
Internet
12.5%
Information Technology and Services
12.5%
Telecommunications
6.3%
Legal Services
6.3%
Other
6.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is GitHub used for?
8 Comments
MK
- store software source code
- use actions to execute CI / CD and publish artefacts / create releases
- lightweight software project managementRead more
What can GitHub be used for?
5 Comments
MS
It's a platform for version controlling. Where group of people collaborate each other and work on a single project. Read more
How is GitHub shaping the landscape of collaborative software development and version control?
3 Comments
HJ
Good Read more
Review Board has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
