# Wipro vs Capgemini Services vs Fujitsu Consulting for a large enterprise selecting an Oracle E-Business Suite reseller: which brings the deepest EBS-specific implementation expertise with the strongest project delivery track record?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Wipro vs Capgemini Services vs Fujitsu Consulting for a large enterprise selecting an Oracle E-Business Suite reseller: which brings the deepest EBS-specific implementation expertise with the strongest project delivery track record? I compared all three across the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/oracle-e-business-suite-resellers"><strong>Oracle E-Business Suite resellers</strong></a> category, and the most useful thing I can tell you is what each firm's G2 evidence actually consists of, because on EBS-specific expertise and delivery track record, the honest answer is that G2 cannot rank these three, and knowing why sharpens the selection process considerably. Here's how the three compare:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/wipro/reviews"><strong>Wipro</strong></a> (4.1 stars, 41 reviews): The volume-and-enterprise profile: the biggest base of the three with a 68% enterprise reviewer mix, and a long public history in Oracle services. What's missing is current evidence: no recent client reviews surfaced in my pulls, so the track-record half of this question rests on what their references show, not what G2 shows. For a large enterprise, demand their last three EBS programs at comparable scale with clients you pick from a full list.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/capgemini-services/reviews"><strong>Capgemini Services</strong></a> (3.9 stars, 26 reviews): The freshest evidence of the three and the most double-edged: current-year client feedback credits genuine support coverage while reporting SLA adherence and delivery-quality shortfalls, and earlier feedback pairs bench depth with outsourcing communication friction. None of it is EBS-specific, and all of it is actionable: their references get asked for SLA adherence records and delivery-location breakdowns, in writing, before shortlisting.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/fujitsu-consulting/reviews"><strong>Fujitsu Consulting</strong></a> (4.5 stars, 10 reviews): The best rating of the three on the least relevant base for this question: ten reviews, mid-market and small-business reviewers, none recent, for a large-enterprise selection. What it does have that the other two listings don't: its G2 profile links straight to a dedicated Oracle enterprise-applications practice (vendor-stated), so the EBS conversation at least starts on a named practice page. Enterprise-scale proof would be entirely reference-borne.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Every firm above will answer these; the depth of the answers is the ranking this thread can't produce. My read on the three as evidence stands is that Wipro offers scale with stale proof, Capgemini offers fresh proof that demands hard probing, and Fujitsu offers the best small-sample score with the least large-enterprise relevance, and a selection this size should treat all three as unranked entrants into the same reference bake-off. The firm that wins is the one whose actual EBS delivery leads, actual program artifacts, and actual past clients survive the decomposed questions above, and honestly, that outcome is not predictable from anything G2 currently holds. If your enterprise ran this exact bake-off recently, which of the three survived your reference checks, and what disqualified the others? That answer would be worth more than every listing in this category.</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 19 days ago
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;Agreed that the three cannot be separated from their profiles alone, which makes a structured evaluation the deciding step. A method that keeps it even is to send all three the same evidence request, recent programs at your scale, the practitioners who would lead them, and a redacted record of how issues were handled, then compare both the speed and the seniority of what comes back.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 15 days ago
- Author title: Marketer





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4