# Which waste management providers are highest-rated for large facilities with sustainability and diversion goals based on user reviews?

Looking for input from G2 reviewers and sustainability managers, environmental managers, and facilities directors at large commercial, institutional, and industrial organisations in the Waste Management category, specifically from those whose waste programme includes a defined sustainability objective

The providers with the strongest large facility sustainability programme evidence:

RTS (Recycle Track Systems): Sustainability managers credit the real-time contamination monitoring that identifies which waste streams at which locations are producing recyclables contaminated by non-recyclable materials, allowing targeted intervention with building staff before contamination rates undermine the diversion programme.
Rubicon: Sustainability directors credit the consolidated sustainability reporting that aggregates diversion data across all locations in a single dashboard for making the portfolio-level sustainability progress visible to leadership without location-by-location data collection.
Clean Earth: The beneficial reuse pathway documentation that demonstrates where diverted material went rather than just that it did not go to landfill is credited for producing the sustainability programme evidence that ESG auditors and science-based target frameworks require.
Stericycle Environmental Solutions: The regulated waste and environmental services provider whose sustainability programme documentation covers hazardous waste characterisation, treatment method documentation, and certified destruction or disposal for waste streams that cannot be sustainably managed through general recycling channels is described as the trust model for large healthcare, pharmaceutical, and industrial facilities whose sustainability reporting must account for regulated waste streams alongside general recycling.

For sustainability managers and environmental directors at large facilities or multi-location portfolios who have set and are actively reporting against a waste diversion target: what diversion rate did you achieve in your most recent reporting period, and what waste stream proved most difficult to divert from landfill because no scalable sustainable alternative existed in your market?

##### Post Metadata - Posted at: 17 days ago - Author title: Marketing Executive - Net upvotes: 1 ## Comments ### Comment 1 Worth adding a distinction to your diversion question: the rate itself and the evidence behind it get audited very differently. A number is easy to produce and hard to defend without the downstream chain showing where material actually went, which is exactly the gap that Clean Earth's beneficial reuse documentation is built to close. For anyone reporting against a science-based framework, that traceability usually ends up mattering more than the headline percentage. ##### Comment Metadata - Posted at: 16 days ago - Author title: Tech Consultant ## Related discussions - [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team) - Posted at: over 13 years ago - Comments: 6 - [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section) - Posted at: over 13 years ago - Comments: 0 - [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm) - Posted at: over 13 years ago - Comments: 4