# Which Smart Contract Audit Services platforms let teams choose qualified smart contract auditors for security verification?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I'm looking at which smart contract audit services actually let a team pick a specific, qualified auditor rather than just submitting code into a queue. Same caveat as always with this space on G2, the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/smart-contract-audit-services">Smart Contract Audit Services</a> category has very few reviewed listings, so this is drawn from a small pool. <strong>HackenProof</strong>, <strong>Softstack</strong>, and <strong>Antier Solutions</strong> stand out for offering more direct control over who does the review.</p><ol>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/hackenproof/reviews"><strong>HackenProof</strong></a>: structures its audits around named security researchers rather than an anonymous process, giving teams more visibility into who is actually doing the verification work.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/softstack/reviews"><strong>Softstack</strong></a>: works directly with clients to scope the audit, which in practice means more say over who's assigned and how deep the review goes.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/antier-solutions/reviews"><strong>Antier Solutions</strong></a>: pairs development and audit teams closely, so clients typically know the specific auditors reviewing their contracts rather than a black box process.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/plavno/reviews"><strong>Plavno</strong></a>: smaller team structure means clients tend to work with the same auditors throughout a project.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/hashlock/reviews"><strong>Hashlock</strong></a>: limited reviews so far, but what's there points to a hands on process rather than an automated scan and report.</li>
</ol><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Has anyone actually gotten to choose or vet the specific auditor on a contract review, and did that level of control change how much you trusted the final report?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 12 days ago
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;HackenProof structuring audits around named security researchers instead of an anonymous process gives a team real visibility into who&#39;s actually doing the review, which matters a lot more than people usually assume going in.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 11 days ago
- Author title: SEO Content Specialist





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4