# Which one is better, a penetration test or a bug bounty?

I can't decide which is better for identifying and mitigating security vulnerabilities: a penetration test or a bug bounty program? Both seem to have their own advantages and limitations, and I am trying to determine the best approach for my organization. Can you help me understand the pros and cons of each, and perhaps offer some insight into how I can make a more informed decision?

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: over 3 years ago
- Author title: Security Manager
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

Hi Suzanne, 

These two services are suited to different needs. A traditional pentest is a great way to test the security of your assets, although they tend to be time-boxed exercises in a continuously changing environment. Given that traditional pentests are often carried out by expert third-party consultants, they can also be extremely expensive.   

A bug bounty, meanwhile, gives continuous security protection over time, where the bounties are open to a wide cross-section of ethical hackers. 

For those in search of some middle ground, Intigriti’s Hybrid Pentest is suitable for fast, targeted checks on assets and if you need proof of attestation for specific compliance. 

 

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: over 3 years ago
- Author title: Product Marketing Manager




## Related Product
[Intigriti](https://www.g2.com/products/intigriti/reviews)

## Related Category
[Bug Tracking](https://www.g2.com/categories/bug-tracking)

## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4