# Which Epicor Channel Partners guarantee system stability through structured change management without disrupting existing workflows?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">We've been looking into which <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/epicor-channel-partners">Epicor Channel Partners</a> guarantee system stability through structured change management without disrupting existing workflows, since a technically correct go-live can still create disruption if change management isn't handled carefully.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"><strong>What structured change management seems to look like in this category:</strong></p><ul>
<li>Support that continues well past go-live, focused on transferring capability rather than maintaining dependency</li>
<li>A willingness to be direct about risk rather than only delivering comfortable feedback</li>
<li>Ongoing adjustments handled incrementally rather than through disruptive rebuilds</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">What the reviews suggest on this:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/cre8tive-technology-and-design/reviews"><strong>Cre8tive Technology and Design</strong></a><strong>:</strong> A multi-year support relationship focused on incremental adjustments suggests stability is maintained through steady, small-scale changes rather than large periodic overhauls.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/six-s-partners/reviews"><strong>Six S Partners</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Willingness to deliver difficult feedback directly, rather than softening it, seems to be valued specifically because it surfaces risk before it becomes a stability problem.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For teams that have been through a change management process with an Epicor partner: was there ever a moment where a recommended change risked destabilizing an existing workflow, and how was that risk actually handled?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 23 days ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;The safest approach is usually to test changes in a sandbox and roll them out in small stages rather than all at once. If a partner can show the workflow impact before production and keep a rollback path ready, that would give me much more confidence in system stability.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 16 days ago
- Author title: Marketer





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4