# Which enterprise idea management platforms work well for large organizations that need to collect and triage thousands of ideas from employees across multiple departments?

 I've been going through G2 reviews as part of a buyer's guide focused specifically on enterprise idea management platforms;  which ones work well for large organizations that need to collect and triage thousands of ideas from employees across multiple departments. Filtered to reviews from enterprise users to see what's actually holding up at scale. Here's what stood out:   HYPE Innovation Management (4.8 stars, 66 reviews): Minimal training required; employees across departments can submit, comment, and vote with almost no learning curve. Supports global deployments and reviewers highlight strong post-launch customer support.  Wazoku (4.4 stars, 120 reviews): Runs focused idea challenges around specific business questions rather than an always-open inbox. Has an AI assistant for idea evaluation.  Qmarkets Impact-Driven Innovation Software (4.5 stars, 43 reviews): Highly configurable; can mirror your org hierarchy, automate stage-gate transitions, and route evaluations without manual admin work. Trusted by large multinationals across consumer goods and automotive.  Planview IdeaPlace (4.0 stars, 61 reviews): Built for large-scale deployments; reviewers describe use cases with 60,000+ users and 4,000+ ideas across 100+ simultaneous challenges. Gives submissions social-media-style visibility to keep contributors engaged.  Sideways 6 (4.4 stars, 41 reviews): Runs inside Microsoft Teams, so distributed and shift-based employees submit ideas without a separate login. Good fit for retail, logistics, and non-desk workforces.  Ideawake (4.6 stars, 63 reviews): Tracks ideas from submission through implementation with configurable review stages and ROI tracking. Works well for orgs running both always-on improvement programs and periodic hackathon-style events.   Which of these have you used at scale? What did triage actually look like once ideas started coming in faster than your team could review them; and did you end up using one platform for the full lifecycle, or combining tools for different parts of the process? 

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 3 months ago
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

<p>At enterprise scale the collecting was never the problem, triage was. Ideas came in far faster than anyone could review them by hand. Two things fixed that for us. Scoping the intake helped most, running time-boxed challenges around a specific question, the way Wazoku does, so we weren't drowning in an always-open inbox with no context. And automating the routing, Qmarkets let us mirror the org hierarchy and move ideas through stage gates to the right evaluators without an admin pushing each one, which is what kept pace with the volume. On the one-tool question, we ran a single platform end to end rather than stitching several together, since the handoffs between tools were where ideas got lost. The real bottleneck is the review process, not the intake.</p>

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 3 months ago
- Author title: SEO Content Writer





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4