# Which AI legal assistants provide accurate legal citations for litigation research?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Citation accuracy is one of the most closely watched issues in AI-assisted legal research, since an incorrect or invented citation can create serious problems in litigation. I’ve noticed AI legal assistants differ in how they source authority, whether citations link back to verifiable documents, and how easily an attorney can confirm that a case or statute says what the tool claims. Practices for checking outputs also vary by firm. Which AI legal assistants have you found provide accurate legal citations for litigation research, and how do you verify them before relying on them?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 7 days ago
- Author title: Team Lead
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;The source link is only the starting point for me. Can you jump straight to the passage used for the answer and see enough surrounding text to understand it? I&#39;d be interested in whether these tools make it easy to spot when a summary goes further than the cited passage actually does.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 6 days ago





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4