# Which AI legal assistant outputs need attorney review before filing in high-stakes matters?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">AI legal assistants can draft, summarize, and research quickly, but in high-stakes matters, anything headed for filing carries real professional risk. Practices differ on which outputs can be trusted with a light check and which need full attorney review. I’ve noticed the answer often depends on the type of output, such as citations, drafted arguments, factual summaries, or deadline calculations, as well as the complexity of the matter. Which AI legal assistant outputs need attorney review before filing in high-stakes matters, and what review practices have you found necessary?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 8 days ago
- Author title: Team Lead
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;I&#39;d be interested in the review workflow itself. Can the attorney open the source passage beside a generated statement, leave a correction, and see whether that correction made it into the final version? A polished draft with no easy way to trace its claims seems like it could create quite a lot of checking work.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 6 days ago





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4