# What's the best VR collaboration software for distributed teams needing immersive presence?

Hey G2 community, I've been trying to answer what's the best VR collaboration software for distributed teams needing immersive presence for my own scattered team, and working through the VR collaboration category, I found that immersive presence is the one thing every vendor promises and no recent review verifies, so I sorted the field by what each platform's presence is actually for. Here's what I found:

MeetinVR: The most direct match to this question's wording I found: a platform built specifically for business meetings in distributed teams, with the vendor positioning its value exactly on presence outcomes, more connected meetings and improved team cohesion for remote work culture (vendor-stated). Its historical base is the second-largest among the business platforms. What no current review tells you is how that presence holds up in 2026 headsets and calendars, which is what your two-week trial is for.
Glue: The presence-purist positioning: remote meetings as great as face-to-face is the entire stated pitch (vendor-stated), on a small historical base with strong marks. For a distributed team whose specific pain is that video calls don't feel like being together, this is the claim to test head-on, and the smallness of the vendor is the counterweight to check on the same call.
Arthur: The enterprise version of presence: freeing teams from geographic constraints with 3D interactive spaces plus productivity features, with historical reviews crediting realistic immersive collaboration and multinational organizations in the customer list (vendor-stated). If your distributed team needs presence plus governance, this is where I'd start.
Spatial: The honest answer to distributed teams as they actually exist: some of your team won't have headsets, and Spatial's cross-device design lets VR, AR, desktop, and mobile participants share the same space (vendor-stated). Presence purists will note desktop attendees are less present, and they're right, but a presence tool your whole team can't enter delivers zero presence, which makes this the pragmatic pick for mixed-hardware teams.

The finding I can't skip, because it shapes everything above: not one authentic review landed anywhere in this category in my twelve-month pulls, so every presence claim here is vendor positioning plus historical praise. For this question specifically, that means your pilot is the evidence: run three real recurring meetings, not demos, in your top pick, and survey the team against your current video baseline. Presence is the single most testable claim in software; it either shows up in your team's own reactions or it doesn't. Distributed team folks, has anyone measured meeting quality before and after moving a recurring meeting into VR? Even informal team feedback posted here would be the freshest evidence this category has

##### Post Metadata - Posted at: 6 days ago - Net upvotes: 1 ## Comments ### Comment 1 <p>I've tried running recurring team meetings in VR and the presence thing is real, but it only works when everyone's actually in a headset. The sessions where half the team joins from a browser felt more disconnected than a regular video call, not less. If your whole team isn't going to wear headsets, I'd think hard about whether the presence benefit even lands.</p> ##### Comment Metadata - Posted at: 1 day ago - Author title: SEO Content Specialist ## Related discussions - [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team) - Posted at: about 13 years ago - Comments: 6 - [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section) - Posted at: about 13 years ago - Comments: 0 - [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm) - Posted at: about 13 years ago - Comments: 4