# What Oracle E-Business Suite deployment trends should enterprise teams understand when evaluating reseller partners?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I've been researching the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/oracle-e-business-suite-resellers"><strong>Oracle E-Business Suite resellers</strong></a> category for a while, and the most useful trend evidence I found isn't in any review, it's in how the partner market itself is now structured. So, what Oracle E-Business Suite deployment trends should enterprise teams understand when evaluating reseller partners? Going by what the providers in this category say about themselves, the market has reorganized around one fork: run-and-improve EBS where it is, or move the workload, and your reseller evaluation should test both sides. Here's what I found:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/centroid/reviews"><strong>Centroid</strong></a>: The clearest statement of where deployment has gone: it positions around running Oracle enterprise workloads across Oracle's cloud, Azure, Amazon, Google, and private cloud, with consulting and managed services for modernization (vendor-stated). Pick a cloud, any cloud is literally its pitch, which tells you infrastructure choice has become part of the reseller conversation, not a separate one.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/gosaas-inc/reviews"><strong>GoSaaS</strong></a>: The pull toward migration: an Oracle-certified partner describing 250+ cloud deployments and Oracle ERP Cloud services for Fortune 1000 and mid-size companies (vendor-stated). Partners that once sold EBS now lead with the destination system, and an enterprise staying on EBS should ask any such partner how much of their bench still works in EBS itself.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/ast-corporation/reviews"><strong>AST Corporation</strong></a>: The counter-example: a provider whose whole G2 descriptor is Oracle E-Business Suite integrator (vendor-stated), representing the specialist end that still exists for enterprises committed to the platform. Zero review evidence either way, so the depth question goes to references.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/btss-corp-solutions-provider/reviews"><strong>BTSS Corp</strong></a>: The same fork from a boutique: Oracle consulting positioned entirely around cloud strategy, migration, and integration on Oracle's cloud platform (vendor-stated). When even the small shops lead with migration, that's the trend talking.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">It's also worth knowing that G2 itself now maintains separate reseller categories for EBS, Oracle Cloud Applications, and Fusion Applications, and the biggest firms sit in all of them at once. For an enterprise team, the practical takeaway is to make every reseller candidate answer two questions in the same meeting: what's your current EBS delivery capacity, and what does your migration practice look like if we choose that road in three years. Partners strong on only one side of that fork are making your roadmap decision for you. Enterprise folks, is your EBS estate on a stay, lift, or migrate path right now, and did your reseller push you toward the answer that suited their bench?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 11 days ago
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;You are right that the reseller market has reorganized around deployment direction, and it is a useful lens. I would add that the timing pressure behind those choices comes mostly from Oracle&#39;s published support horizon for E-Business Suite, so grounding the evaluation in that calendar first tends to clarify which direction actually fits a given estate. On the partner side, a firm that promotes cloud modernization can still maintain a strong operations practice for teams that plan to remain on the platform, so the productive check is their certified headcount by discipline rather than their headline positioning. That is what separates a genuine dual capability from a single specialty.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 7 days ago
- Author title: Marketer





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4